pinkrose2012, MagnusGreeol, ruleroftheworld1 = SD [ka]

by **riskllama** on Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:01 pm

shee it, nuthin' gets egg offa wookie face...

by **Chewie1** on Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:25 pm

riskllama wrote:shee it, nuthin' gets egg offa wookie face...

No egg on my face pal..... Owens response proved my point.

Just pointless trolling of a C&A thread....

Pointing out the fact ive made 1k post therefore am only an average forum user YAWN. I log in to play the games but yes occasionally surf the forum.

by **owenshooter** on Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:43 pm

Chewie1 wrote:
riskllama wrote:shee it, nuthin' gets egg offa wookie face...

No egg on my face pal..... it's cake!!!

Owens response was dead on. he caught me trolling a C&A thread, adding a false opinion based on nothing....

Pointing out the fact ive made 1k post therefore am only an average forum user was very accurate. I log in to play the games but yes occasionally surf the forum. which, as he stated, makes me an AVERAGE FORUM USER

i'm glad you understand... now can you please stop taking this off topic? very interested in this ruling and still wondering why the site has never suggested clan mates announce themselves as such, when playing non team games... thanks for the input, Chewie!! love when people can admit their mistakes...-Jn

by **iAmCaffeine** on Wed Dec 07, 2016 9:00 pm

Ban them anyway 'cause it'd be funny.

by **king achilles** on Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:15 pm

Locked for now.

by **king achilles** on Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:02 pm

This report came about in the 6th round and as you found out that they have played multiple team games before you notice that they do not attack each other even though they are bordering one another and they coordinate their moves but basing this from two different games other the one you are in with them. The accusation seems to be more on in general than in just one game alone.

This looks pretty weak but I am going to give you more time to provide more proof to support this claim. If it is only one player who is playing suspiciously, may I remind that this does not mean the player benefiting from someone else's play is automatically in a secret alliance with him.

Unlocked.

by **MagnusGreeol** on Fri Dec 09, 2016 5:03 am

king achilles wrote:This report came about in the 6th round and as you found out that they have played multiple team games before you notice that they do not attack each other even though they are bordering one another and they coordinate their moves but basing this from two different games other the one you are in with them. The accusation seems to be more on in general than in just one game alone.

This looks pretty weak but I am going to give you more time to provide more proof to support this claim. If it is only one player who is playing suspiciously, may I remind that this does not mean the player benefiting from someone else's play is automatically in a secret alliance with him.

Unlocked.

- Curly can have infinite time to try and prove we were cheating, We can leave this report here until I or CC is dead and you won't have anything on us, But go ahead and leave this here so vultures like Caff. can pick it apart.

--\MGM/-♎

by **iAmCaffeine** on Fri Dec 09, 2016 10:06 am

I'm a vulture for making a joke? Oh dear.

by **pinkrose2012** on Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:53 pm

Not that I should have to justify anything but....
I'm about sick over this "cheating" accusation. I invited my clan mates to fill the game quickly, now regret it. I know everyone is questioning my play and I don't care, it wasn't to cheat or favor anyone. My bonus is merely in the top corner and before anyone can ever get to Mags, I have to be gone through first. My having him blocked in gives me >(to me)< an upper hand and easier if I could take him out for elimination. And harder for anyone else to take.Basically, holding him hostage. No matter who had been there I would have played the same. I am also keeping troops as I can to secure from him or anyone else. I also wanted access to the other spectrum of the map so when I could cash in I had easy access to everyone and it wasn't so hard for me to get down there, wasting troops if you will making it easier for take outs.. That was the only spot I had access to on that end really and was trying to hold troops down there, he ((curlyfrys)) just happened to have had troops there too. I needed somewhere else to nest as well, instead of just up in the corner....He ((curlyfrys)) just happened to be in the cross fire. Everyone had corners but him, he could have chosen to take one, He did not yet hold that as a bonus yet because I already had troops there, I was just nesting out, or trying to. It's not like I marched all the way south just to bust him...Now my play is being questioned. I did NOT favor or target anyone. I was looking out for "me"..It may not have been "fair" or the best of strategy IN YOUR EYES, but I have my own ways and thinking and instead of trying to understand that we all see plays differently, people start pointing fingers.

I'm sorry. I won't play any other game with my clan unless it's a team. If I even stay. I don't know if I want to pay to stay a member on a site that I can't enjoy playing without BS like this when I've done nothing wrong. This accusation is so unfortunate.
I had my own strategy and reasoning's for my moves (whether you agree or not)-bottom line.

Best Regards,
Pinky- ( and I am a "she" not a "he"

)

by **iAmCaffeine** on Fri Dec 09, 2016 2:49 pm

Definitely doesn't smell like a rose, more akin to haddock. I had haddock for dinner tonight too.

by **king achilles** on Fri Dec 09, 2016 6:48 pm

Since no new evidence has been provided I am going to clear this report. I think it goes without saying, this is the burden of clanmates playing in a non team game. The moment that you give more attacks to the other players, you will most likely get suspected of collusion.