If you guys didn't like my avatar you could've just told me

[Symmetry]

DSOIV I mean exactly what I say. Meddlesome is the word I chose to use. No amount of troublesome meddling on your part will convince anyone that you have any future as an interpretive agent in any capacity. Especially when the post you attempt to re-imagine is coached in simple english that even the most moronic, mouth breathing, double digit IQ, shambolic excuse for a human could understand. Thank you for taking conversation off topic by introducing your second favourite topic - nazis.
As a person with some jewish heritage I'm not offended, I prefer bigotry out in the open where I can see it. As you were kiddo. Return to your treatise on the inhumanity of heterosexuals.

Baffling stuff again, B. I'm up for an open discussion, if you are, but that might mean you'll have to reconcile your single issue posting with my posts.

I think you've taken the first step in admitting to yourself that there are other issues I care about. I can see that that must have been tough, what with the fairly obvious discomfort and self-justifying that followed.

Are you up for a debate, or are you you gonna keep suggestimg that I'm subhunan?

[Dukasaur]

i don't understand why you would be given a polite mail letting you know that you were offending people. i have never received such a warning and i have received pretty much every warning they have on this site. is this a new policy? is this a new forum/site rule?

This is not a new policy. As long as I've been on CC, people who have offensive usernames, signatures, etc. have gotten friendly nudges asking them to voluntarily change them. And most people, once they realize they're making others uncomfortable, do comply.

This from the guy who thought that Confederate plus SS as a username plus the Confederate flag was inoffensive?

What happens when a username commemorates the Nazis, and a nation whose cornerstone was slavery?

If that's not an offensive username, what is?

I, personally, am not offended by anyone's username.

Just to be clear, I was not in any way involved in what went on with the OP. I am not one of the people who reported him, I did not process the reports, and I did not offer my opinion on them. I posted here for the simple purpose of rebutting Owen's post about this being a new policy. I clarified that this policy has existed at least as long as I've been here.

You might consider not reflexively attacking people who simply step forward to offer relevant information.

[Symmetry]

i don't understand why you would be given a polite mail letting you know that you were offending people. i have never received such a warning and i have received pretty much every warning they have on this site. is this a new policy? is this a new forum/site rule?

This is not a new policy. As long as I've been on CC, people who have offensive usernames, signatures, etc. have gotten friendly nudges asking them to voluntarily change them. And most people, once they realize they're making others uncomfortable, do comply.

This from the guy who thought that Confederate plus SS as a username plus the Confederate flag was inoffensive?

What happens when a username commemorates the Nazis, and a nation whose cornerstone was slavery?

If that's not an offensive username, what is?

I, personally, am not offended by anyone's username.

Just to be clear, I was not in any way involved in what went on with the OP. I am not one of the people who reported him, I did not process the reports, and I did not offer my opinion on them. I posted here for the simple purpose of rebutting Owen's post about this being a new policy. I clarified that this policy has existed at least as long as I've been here.

You might consider not reflexively attacking people who simply step forward to offer relevant information.

It's certainly worthy of consideration, Mr "I didn't know the SS meant Nazis"

Kidding! Though obviously you didn't exactly go out of your way to correct your mistake.

Let's just say we all learned something.

[ConfederateSS]

----------Mook...should of left it...At first I was thinking it was Clinton in blackface...Are there not any Al Jolson fans any more? Then I remembered what it was you put. ...If I were you...I'd go ahead with Clinton in blackface...It's suits her better. ...Hell,I might make it my SIG...
----------NOW TO TAKE CARE OF MY SHADOW...
----------A Country based on states rights...Even to this day...ALL 50 states have different laws,taxes,etc..etc...LIKE IN THIS ELECTION ...some states find having to show I.D...offensive...JUST STOP WITH ALL THE BULL SHIT...NOW WE CAN VOTE,1,2,..a 1,000 times if we want... ...WHY NOT HAVE A US ID or A US driver's license???
----------AS FOR WHAT IS WHAT................SELENA/SOFIA..........To learn more...If you can't contact your local library............TRY...my post...March 27,2016 8:22pm...about what's what...in my shadow's attack thread...I'm not typing all that again... ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)... ... SUPPORT ORLANDO...THE CSA ...now a symbol against ISIS(crescent moon)...WHY...BECAUSE I MADE IT SO...DEAL WITH IT!!!

[owenshooter]

i don't understand why you would be given a polite mail letting you know that you were offending people. i have never received such a warning and i have received pretty much every warning they have on this site. is this a new policy? is this a new forum/site rule?

This is not a new policy. As long as I've been on CC, people who have offensive usernames, signatures, etc. have gotten friendly nudges asking them to voluntarily change them. And most people, once they realize they're making others uncomfortable, do comply.

This from the guy who thought that Confederate plus SS as a username plus the Confederate flag was inoffensive?

What happens when a username commemorates the Nazis, and a nation whose cornerstone was slavery?

If that's not an offensive username, what is?

I, personally, am not offended by anyone's username.

Just to be clear, I was not in any way involved in what went on with the OP. I am not one of the people who reported him, I did not process the reports, and I did not offer my opinion on them. I posted here for the simple purpose of rebutting Owen's post about this being a new policy. I clarified that this policy has existed at least as long as I've been here.

You might consider not reflexively attacking people who simply step forward to offer relevant information.

It's certainly worthy of consideration, Mr "I didn't know the SS meant Nazis"

Kidding! Though obviously you didn't exactly go out of your way to correct your mistake.

Let's just say we all learned something.

i'm not quite sure what DSOIV's issue is here... and Duk, i did not claim it was a new policy, i QUESTIONED if it were a new policy. HUGE difference. please don't put words into the black jesus' mouth (we can discuss other things via pm, if you know what i'm sayin )... the black jesus spews enough crap, without being saddled with things he did not actually utter... however, i do concur that DSOIV seems to simply want to attack you for being helpful. i don't understand this destructive behaviour, it confounds and perplexes me... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

[Dukasaur]

i don't understand why you would be given a polite mail letting you know that you were offending people. i have never received such a warning and i have received pretty much every warning they have on this site. is this a new policy? is this a new forum/site rule?

This is not a new policy. As long as I've been on CC, people who have offensive usernames, signatures, etc. have gotten friendly nudges asking them to voluntarily change them. And most people, once they realize they're making others uncomfortable, do comply.

This from the guy who thought that Confederate plus SS as a username plus the Confederate flag was inoffensive?

What happens when a username commemorates the Nazis, and a nation whose cornerstone was slavery?

If that's not an offensive username, what is?

I, personally, am not offended by anyone's username.

Just to be clear, I was not in any way involved in what went on with the OP. I am not one of the people who reported him, I did not process the reports, and I did not offer my opinion on them. I posted here for the simple purpose of rebutting Owen's post about this being a new policy. I clarified that this policy has existed at least as long as I've been here.

You might consider not reflexively attacking people who simply step forward to offer relevant information.

It's certainly worthy of consideration, Mr "I didn't know the SS meant Nazis"

Kidding! Though obviously you didn't exactly go out of your way to correct your mistake.

Let's just say we all learned something.

i'm not quite sure what DSOIV's issue is here... and Duk, i did not claim it was a new policy, i QUESTIONED if it were a new policy. HUGE difference. please don't put words into the black jesus' mouth (we can discuss other things via pm, if you know what i'm sayin )... the black jesus spews enough crap, without being saddled with things he did not actually utter... however, i do concur that DSOIV seems to simply want to attack you for being helpful. i don't understand this destructive behaviour, it confounds and perplexes me... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

Very well.

Can we talk about Baskin-Robbins next?

[Symmetry]

You could use a break- apologies for giving you a hard time about it, and to he fair, you did accept via PM that you were duped by the username and his posts.

So... ever tried lavender ice-cream? And what's your take on gelato?

[DoomYoshi]

This thread reminds me of my favorite line from the show "Hairspray":

snicker, snicker, sneer, sneer

[Dukasaur]

You could use a break- apologies for giving you a hard time about it, and to he fair, you did accept via PM that you were duped by the username and his posts.

So... ever tried lavender ice-cream? And what's your take on gelato?

I slightly prefer gelato to American-style ice cream, but I like both.

Actually, took the wife out for gelato today. We went to, or at least intended to go to, Cows, which according to a Readers' Digest poll is the best ice creamery in Canada. Cows is a small and hoity-toity chain. There are less than 20 locations across Canada, all in very upscale and/or touristy locations, and the only one in Ontario is in Niagara-on-the-Lake, right in the tourist strip.

By a miracle I found a parking spot only one block away, and I walked down to Cows to fetch the ice cream. When I got there, the line was a triple-S bend through the store and out the door. So I said to myself, "I don't care how good their fucking ice cream is; I'm not standing in that line."

Right across the street from Cows is this relatively unknown pastry shop which also sells ice cream and gelato, so I went there instead. The line was a lot shorter. The wife has really boring tastes, so for her I got a strawberry shortcake sundae with a bonus layer of black cherry gelato. Safe, predictable. For myself, I got Nutella ice cream with a layer of passion fruit gelato. I also got a big cappuccino.

Getting it back to the car was a mini-adventure. It was 33 degrees Celsius today, and sunny and windy, so the moment I left the shop it was like trying to carry ice cream through a steel mill. The heat just hit me like Hephaestus' fist, and the ice cream began melting instantly. Didn't help that gelato has a slightly lower melting point than American ice cream. The stuff was all running down my arms, and I had a block to go back to the car, holding two large ice creams and a large cappuccino. Got it back to the car, cranked up the A/C to max, began licking the stuff off my hands and the outside of the cups.

Soon found out I had made an excellent choice. The cappuccino was garbage; I needn't have bothered with that. But the ice cream was nothing less than amazing. Nutella is so thick and rich, and passion fruit is so crisp and acidic, they were the perfect pairing. A big bite of the Nutella ice cream, so rich and thick and sweet, and then a quick zip of the passion fruit gelato, a perfect tangy palate cleanser. Basically the icy equivalent of truffles and wine.

Absolutely amazing.

[BoganGod]

DSOIV I mean exactly what I say. Meddlesome is the word I chose to use. No amount of troublesome meddling on your part will convince anyone that you have any future as an interpretive agent in any capacity. Especially when the post you attempt to re-imagine is coached in simple english that even the most moronic, mouth breathing, double digit IQ, shambolic excuse for a human could understand. Thank you for taking conversation off topic by introducing your second favourite topic - nazis.
As a person with some jewish heritage I'm not offended, I prefer bigotry out in the open where I can see it. As you were kiddo. Return to your treatise on the inhumanity of heterosexuals.

Baffling stuff again, B. I'm up for an open discussion, if you are, but that might mean you'll have to reconcile your single issue posting with my posts.

I think you've taken the first step in admitting to yourself that there are other issues I care about. I can see that that must have been tough, what with the fairly obvious discomfort and self-justifying that followed.

Are you up for a debate, or are you you gonna keep suggestimg that I'm subhunan?

Dear DSOIV, at no time have I suggested you are sub chinese. Hainanese chicken rice is one of my favourite dishes to order at chinese or singaporian restaurants. I'm loath to debate you, as you seem to be unable to answer questions directly. You always dissemble or deflect, go off on some weird tanget or generally just give random responses. A debate requires a more formal level of argument. Something I suspect you would be unwilling or unable to do.

[owenshooter]

*another off topic post about another of my pet projects, which i failed to ram down the sites throat*

what does this have to do with this thread? what does a username that has nothing to do with the avatar being discussed, have to do with anything being discussed. you lost the fight, please stop trying to derail this thread with your quest. go start another thread or a C&A thread about said user. it doesn't belong in here... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

[Symmetry]

DSOIV I mean exactly what I say. Meddlesome is the word I chose to use. No amount of troublesome meddling on your part will convince anyone that you have any future as an interpretive agent in any capacity. Especially when the post you attempt to re-imagine is coached in simple english that even the most moronic, mouth breathing, double digit IQ, shambolic excuse for a human could understand. Thank you for taking conversation off topic by introducing your second favourite topic - nazis.
As a person with some jewish heritage I'm not offended, I prefer bigotry out in the open where I can see it. As you were kiddo. Return to your treatise on the inhumanity of heterosexuals.

Baffling stuff again, B. I'm up for an open discussion, if you are, but that might mean you'll have to reconcile your single issue posting with my posts.

I think you've taken the first step in admitting to yourself that there are other issues I care about. I can see that that must have been tough, what with the fairly obvious discomfort and self-justifying that followed.

Are you up for a debate, or are you you gonna keep suggestimg that I'm subhunan?

Dear DSOIV, at no time have I suggested you are sub chinese. Hainanese chicken rice is one of my favourite dishes to order at chinse or singaporian restaurants. I'm loath to debate you, as you seem to be unable to answer questions directly. You always dissemble or deflect, go off on some weird tanget or generally just give random responses. A debate requires a more formal level of argument. Something I suspect you would be unwilling or unable to do.

Cute, but you've attracted bottom feeders. Stay classy next time