Moderator: Community Team
dd515087 wrote:I investigated virus last night because a lot of people thought he was suspicious. Got the same "no result" result as when I investigated IB
StorrZerg wrote:Hotshot been bandwagoning most of the game.
Virus did push his own case, own ideas. that gives him some town credit even though it was on the doc. He also pushed day 1 on crasp. It wasn't sudden pressure.
StorrZerg wrote:i think it's possible the lack of return could be indication of not a threat to you.
HotShot53 wrote:dd515087 wrote:I investigated virus last night because a lot of people thought he was suspicious. Got the same "no result" result as when I investigated IB
Can you ask for more clarification what exactly you are investigating, and what kind of results you'd get if you did get results?
Iron Butterfly wrote:legionnare wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:I believe I was blocked as I was unable to open my gift, which was not the same gift that Storr received.
How do you know it was not the same as Storr's if you couldn't open it?
Storrr received a flash drive. I received a glowing ball. Like Storr was given the choice to open it. I replied I would open it. I was then informed this morning that I failed in opening my gift.
I would be curious as to what the results were from DDs night action.
We had a night kill from mafia and I believe I was blocked, which makes perfect sense as I used a cop investigation on you the night before. I highly doubt DD was blocked by mafia last night.
StorrZerg wrote:So fking ask, does you literally no harm to ask more pointed questions about how your new unique role works.
HotShot53 wrote:Well, no-one has said anything that scummy yet really... so I will vote for the most inactive person so far, vote colton
As others have said, checking in late but giving no opinion on anything then or since then isn't that great. To be honest, I would expect dd to be town rather than scum, usually scum are more interested in the game early on, enough to make 1 or 2 posts anyway; anyone who's played knows that not posting at all will get you voted, so I don't think that was intentional on his part.
HotShot53 wrote:Well, no-one has said anything that scummy yet really... so I will vote for the most inactive person so far, vote colton
As others have said, checking in late but giving no opinion on anything then or since then isn't that great. To be honest, I would expect dd to be town rather than scum, usually scum are more interested in the game early on, enough to make 1 or 2 posts anyway; anyone who's played knows that not posting at all will get you voted, so I don't think that was intentional on his part.
dd515087 wrote:Apparently, I get told the alignment of the person I investigate. I do not know what "no result" means. Maybe I was blocked? Or they could both be the same alignment and I am only told if they are of a certain alignment? IDK
StorrZerg wrote:dd515087 wrote:Apparently, I get told the alignment of the person I investigate. I do not know what "no result" means. Maybe I was blocked? Or they could both be the same alignment and I am only told if they are of a certain alignment? IDK
Ask if that means block or could be blocked.
dd515087 wrote:Apparently, I get told the alignment of the person I investigate. I do not know what "no result" means. Maybe I was blocked? Or they could both be the same alignment and I am only told if they are of a certain alignment? IDK
Streaker wrote:Vote count:
virus90 (2): HotShot53, ???
There are 9 still employed, it takes 5 to Fire someone.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users