Moderator: Community Team
anamainiacks wrote:@AoG
I study statistics, and I'm pretty sure lynching on Day 1 is not a statistical disadvantage.
And as mentioned by Zivel and Storr, Day 1 does provide information even based on the interactions - even the conversations itself are information, even if simply in the form of the vibes you get from people; and seeing people's voting patterns. Everyone also does need information to go on, no matter how intangible it is, to decide how to use their night actions, if any. Otherwise, using town night actions would be just as much a shot in the dark, and likely to yield no results.
So even if we do end up settling for a no lynch, advocating it at this point is asking us to ignore/cut short all conversations so far, and totally remove possibility of any scum slips in the rest of Day 1 - of which we have 8.5 real days left, if I'm not wrong.
Zivel wrote:StorrZerg wrote:God you bleed town anamainiacks
Have to agree, that was a solid first post and explained coherently why we vote day one.
I am still pushing for an Ultra lynch, he has not come back to defend himself and so is either afk or lurking. Till I hear more from him, I am happy for him to die today.
Will come back later after shopping with a more comprehensive list.
Army of GOD wrote:Also, I kind of want to put a cote on Store because he's getting annoying
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
mtamburini wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Also, I kind of want to put a cote on Store because he's getting annoying
Rekt you got a potential vote for being annoying before I did HOW DOES THAT MAKE YOU FEEL BRUH
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
UltrasPlot wrote:EBWOP (wall o' text lol)
Strike, you're also ruling out:
- The possibility of mafia getting fakeclaims prepared
- The possibility of a BG tomorrow night (interesting that you include cop dying but not cop bg'd)
- I have never seen an altered sanity cop in a game without a sane cop
- Mislynch provides info? Now? Explain how you tell apart a townie tricked by rhetoric and a mafia purposefully mislynching.
- Our odds are worse than pure random if we randlynch as stated above
- The chances of an altered sanity cop are lower than 22% tbh
- It's easier to verify roles with results than those without
If you still think randlynch is the right way to go I may as well lynch you for helping us lose.
UltrasPlot wrote:Strike, you seem to be pushing for a Day One lynch, along with Zivel. Explain how you will get scum without any info. Although 11/5 (or 12/4) seems like a worse ratio, mafia probably has one or maybe even two one-shot kill roles.
Also, as I mentioned before, scumminess does not add up well Day One with little to no info. There was no Night Zero. There is nothing except glorified guessing. My vote stays for No Lynch.
Zivel wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:They are both scum and are misdirectino us...
C'mon, people! Down with Pancake!
This one is also pretty scummish to me, shoots down the two who are actually saying anything and then pulls a random out of thin air. Why pancake? I have my reasons but I would be interested to hear yours.
crazymilkshake5 wrote:All in all, I shall Vote Crasp until we get information out of him.
StorrZerg wrote:how ever you are right about pcm, thanks for responding about him. it is hard to get a read on someone who is lacking content... How ever i think his post was not helpful to the game.
Army of GOD wrote:it's day 1, I honestly don't understand how there can be any reads this early.
vote no lynch
I hate lynching someone day 1. Always ends up wasting a townie.
Anarkistsdream wrote:.... Because I have played mafia with him for 7 years... On this site... And... I... like... to.... give.... him.... shit....
StorrZerg wrote:you can use all the credits you want about history, but you need to explain your reads. Just simply stating "i have tenor and this guy is mafia" doesn't mean shit when we don't know your alignment.
Anarkistsdream
still doing nothing to contribute tot he game
Zivel wrote:Where did you say this beforehand, maybe I missed it? In the above quote are the two post you made, I see nothing about giving PCM shit.... All I see is you pulling his name out of thin air.
StorrZerg wrote:fantastic! keep avoiding the game. Those who havne't voted really should consider pressuring anark since he is active, and not doing anything.
Anarkistsdream wrote:StorrZerg wrote:God you bleed town anamainiacks
........ You are far too narcissistic.
UltrasPlot wrote:EBWOP (wall o' text lol)
Strike, you're also ruling out:
- The possibility of mafia getting fakeclaims prepared
- The possibility of a BG tomorrow night (interesting that you include cop dying but not cop bg'd)
- I have never seen an altered sanity cop in a game without a sane cop
- Mislynch provides info? Now? Explain how you tell apart a townie tricked by rhetoric and a mafia purposefully mislynching.
- Our odds are worse than pure random if we randlynch as stated above
- The chances of an altered sanity cop are lower than 22% tbh
- It's easier to verify roles with results than those without
If you still think randlynch is the right way to go I may as well lynch you for helping us lose.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
UltrasPlot wrote:Strike, you seem to be pushing for a Day One lynch, along with Zivel. Explain how you will get scum without any info. Although 11/5 (or 12/4) seems like a worse ratio, mafia probably has one or maybe even two one-shot kill roles.
Also, as I mentioned before, scumminess does not add up well Day One with little to no info. There was no Night Zero. There is nothing except glorified guessing. My vote stays for No Lynch.
UltrasPlot wrote:EBWOP (wall o' text lol)
Strike, you're also ruling out:
- The possibility of mafia getting fakeclaims prepared. Nope. Fake claims can be strong but they can't be fool proof like some town roles are. By nature, most fake claims either cannot be proven or are not alignment indicative. Advantage in claiming still lies with town.
- The possibility of a BG tomorrow night (interesting that you include cop dying but not cop bg'd) Not sure what you mean by BG. Bodyguard? Sure a cop might get protected especially if people know who the cop is but if he doesn't claim (which is probably a smarter move as there are many things a mafia could do to mess with a known cop depending on what power roles they were given) than the chances that mafia hits the cop randomly between 1 in 14, 1 in 13 and 1 in 12 (assuming no extra kills) are better odds than a townie randomly protecting the cop.
- I have never seen an altered sanity cop in a game without a sane copMaybe but the question would be figuring out which cop was the sane one and less is there a sane cop.
- Mislynch provides info? Now? Explain how you tell apart a townie tricked by rhetoric and a mafia purposefully mislynching. There is no simple answer for that but you'd have to examine behavior and yes mafia does act differently. Who was actually using solid logic and who was twisting it? Who simply bandwagoned vs the person who pushed for it? Did this player's intent seem like scum hunting or was he blood thirsty? etc. I have to assume you know of these, you have referenced them in at least one of your posts.
- Our odds are worse than pure random if we randlynch as stated above. Only true if you assume that town is stupid and doesn't know how to scumhunt. There are a lot of experienced players in this game.
- The chances of an altered sanity cop are lower than 22% tbh You seem to be sticking strong to the sanity cop. What's your rebuttal to the other factors that might bias a result such as busdriver, miller, godfather, framer, etc? Miller isn't overly likely but godfather generally is in the majority of standard mafia set ups and framer/busdriver are fairly common as well.
- It's easier to verify roles with results than those withoutTrue. It's also easier to get meaningful results from people who make informed actions rather than random ones.
If you still think randlynch is the right way to go I may as well lynch you for helping us lose.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
mtamburini wrote:Zivel wrote:StorrZerg wrote:God you bleed town anamainiacks
Have to agree, that was a solid first post and explained coherently why we vote day one.
I am still pushing for an Ultra lynch, he has not come back to defend himself and so is either afk or lurking. Till I hear more from him, I am happy for him to die today.
Will come back later after shopping with a more comprehensive list.
I didnt read the whole thing, TLDR but based on what you said you are giving him a TR based on mechanics of the game.
Storr are you in agreement of this assessment or do you read him towny in a different way?
Zivel wrote:StorrZerg wrote:God you bleed town anamainiacks
Have to agree, that was a solid first post and explained coherently why we vote day one.
I am still pushing for an Ultra lynch, he has not come back to defend himself and so is either afk or lurking. Till I hear more from him, I am happy for him to die today.
Will come back later after shopping with a more comprehensive list.
@Pancake: I can't imply newbie mistake for the simple reason that Ultra says he has mafia experience elsewhere.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
UltrasPlot wrote:In a game with 17 players we will definitely have an info role, ffs.
Assuming 5 mafia (this is a liberal estimate): we are 12/5 right now. We lose one and 11/5 the next day, with cop info. The randlynch right now is utterly pointless, based off slips of the finger - something unreliable. Mafia is definitely playing carefully to NOT seem scummy. We have ZERO info right now. A townie is more likely to seem scummy Day One just because MAFIA are paying more attention to the game to not get lynched. Therefore I would much rather go in 11/5 than 10/5... since we CANNOT rule out extra mafia killing roles.
Also consider this:
If I were mafia why would I not hop onto a bandwagon? You guys seem to barely notice those, while the better play is called 'scummy.'
Whatsausage wrote:
And then zivel hops right on to agree as well.
Followed by promising a list we have yet to see (I'd give him more time on it, but it has been a decently long shopping trip)
Right now I am getting scum vibes from zivel
anamainiacks wrote:Pretty much your case on PCM so far... I thought you were throwing around the comments as a joke before, but we're clearly not joking around anymore. Your only justification for your scheme so far is pretty much "I've played mafia with him for a long time" (which means he's scum... how?), and that you "like to give him shit". All this after people have asked for proper support to your suspicions, and you in turn accuse them of skimming.
And you've basically ignored everything that everyone else has commented aside from their comments directed to you, which feels as though you're trying to take everyone's attention off the reads on each other, and going, "Stop all the constructive conversation! Let's all just vote PCM because I like to give him shit!"
Well if you had read everything that's been said regarding why and how Day 1 is useful, then you needn't be asking this question. The information you're asking about can even be found on the same page as this post of yours. So if you're asking us to pressure the skimmers, you'd definitely be one of them.
Your play isn't necessarily scummy, but it sure isn't helpful or constructive at this point.
So even if we do end up settling for a no lynch, advocating it at this point is asking us to ignore/cut short all conversations so far, and totally remove possibility of any scum slips in the rest of Day 1 - of which we have 8.5 real days left, if I'm not wrong.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users