Moderator: Clan Directors
Chariot of Fire wrote:No mate, I'd never stoop to calling you one of those
chemefreak wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:No mate, I'd never stoop to calling you one of those
Thank you. This made my day. Hysterical.
jetsetwilly wrote:Can I ask why the semi final tie breaker 7th game was changed from world 2.1 to random? I'm not convinced that's a great choice for a game that could decide a 67 game war.
In the event that it did finish 30 30 is that one of the changes the clans can negotiate?
chemefreak wrote:jetsetwilly wrote:Can I ask why the semi final tie breaker 7th game was changed from world 2.1 to random? I'm not convinced that's a great choice for a game that could decide a 67 game war.
In the event that it did finish 30 30 is that one of the changes the clans can negotiate?
Hindsight is 20/20 my friend. But if the two participating clans can agree, we will listen.
Doc_Brown wrote:chemefreak wrote:jetsetwilly wrote:Can I ask why the semi final tie breaker 7th game was changed from world 2.1 to random? I'm not convinced that's a great choice for a game that could decide a 67 game war.
In the event that it did finish 30 30 is that one of the changes the clans can negotiate?
Hindsight is 20/20 my friend. But if the two participating clans can agree, we will listen.
Both ACE and TOFU have agreed that if a tie breaker is necessary for our war, the 7th game should be trips sunny,chained,no spoils on World 2.1.
Emmdizzle wrote:what about beta maps? are they acceptable as well?
Foxglove wrote:haha - I'm guessing we'll see another Conquer Rome, and at least 2 more months of time!
chemefreak wrote:Foxglove wrote:haha - I'm guessing we'll see another Conquer Rome, and at least 2 more months of time!
A suggestion was made to have all seven games be: Hive, quads, no spoils, adjacent, foggy, trench. This, of course, is a joke, but should illustrate that it could be worse!
Denise wrote:oops, that's what we sent. We don't want to drag this out but it was our best choice. I don't know very much about the map but I'm thinking doubles may speed it up a bit.
ChrisPond wrote:Denise wrote:oops, that's what we sent. We don't want to drag this out but it was our best choice. I don't know very much about the map but I'm thinking doubles may speed it up a bit.
Either that or ACE can surrender and we go for objectives on about turn 5?
chemefreak wrote:Foxglove wrote:haha - I'm guessing we'll see another Conquer Rome, and at least 2 more months of time!
A suggestion was made to have all seven games be: Hive, quads, no spoils, adjacent, foggy, trench. This, of course, is a joke, but should illustrate that it could be worse!
chemefreak wrote:Emmdizzle wrote:what about beta maps? are they acceptable as well?
Your clan is no longer in this challenge. Please talk to your CCup5 representative for the answer to your question.
jj3044 wrote:chemefreak wrote:Foxglove wrote:haha - I'm guessing we'll see another Conquer Rome, and at least 2 more months of time!
A suggestion was made to have all seven games be: Hive, quads, no spoils, adjacent, foggy, trench. This, of course, is a joke, but should illustrate that it could be worse!
You ask, and we deliver! Just for Foxxy and Cheme, we have one CR and one Hive in the tie breaker set.
chemefreak wrote:Update....KORT vs TOFU in the final. Both clans are already talking so it should get going here soon. We just reached out to TSM and ACE to see if they want to fight out their 3rd place match or not. Will update when we get word on that.
chemefreak wrote:Update....KORT vs TOFU in the final. Both clans are already talking so it should get going here soon. We just reached out to TSM and ACE to see if they want to fight out their 3rd place match or not. Will update when we get word on that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users