Conquer Club

Put Esc back the way it was

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!

What is your opinion?

Leave the new system for escalating cards in place.
7
22%
Go back to the old system for escalating cards.
18
56%
Create another escalating card system.
2
6%
Have different escalating values for different game types.
5
16%
 
Total votes : 32

Put Esc back the way it was

Postby Silly Knig-it on Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:40 am

I would like to see the increase in the size of esqualating spoils returned to what it was. I believe the change is causing the opposite of the intent. Perhaps that is only my experience in which case I will not worry about it.

What I have experienced is the following: Because of the increased size of a set, a person who is almost out of the game is now very much back in the game. Particularly in trench it is becoming almost impossible to eliminate someone. I have noticed this on maps such as Conquer Rome that routinely go 10+ rounds at least (normal game).
Example Game 13910367 which has now gone to Round 25, next set worth 3070.


How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
I think the change is causing the effect it was designed to cure. i.e. Bringing games to a close. I think the change (which I agreed with) has gone the wrong direction.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant Silly Knig-it
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 2997
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 12:21 am
Location: Everett, WA

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby DoomYoshi on Tue Mar 18, 2014 12:01 pm

Did you play Escalating Trench before the change? It was basically the same thing.
ā–‘ā–’ā–’ā–“ā–“ā–“ā–’ā–’ā–‘
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10723
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Silly Knig-it on Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:42 pm

Yes I did but one could contain an opponent and account for his set. That doesn't feel possible now. At this point in this map at least two should be gone.

That's my feeling anyway. If I am all alone I will just chalk it up to 'that's the way the chips fell' but if others experience the same then I wanted to know.

Like I said I was in favor of the reason the change was made. I just think this didn't accomplish what was intended.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant Silly Knig-it
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 2997
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 12:21 am
Location: Everett, WA

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby DoomYoshi on Tue Mar 18, 2014 11:58 pm

I am not sure the suggestion in question was designed for Trench games, as most of the posts were pre-dated trench.
ā–‘ā–’ā–’ā–“ā–“ā–“ā–’ā–’ā–‘
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10723
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Dukasaur on Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:57 am

Trench and Escalating is a bad combination any way you slice it.

I love Escalating and I sometimes love Trench, but not at the same time. The wild free-roaming game that Esc is designed for is the opposite of the patient, positional game that Trench is designed for.
ā€œā€ŽLife is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.ā€
ā€• Voltaire
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Dukasaur
Community Coordinator
Community Coordinator
 
Posts: 27717
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby ooge on Wed Mar 19, 2014 1:53 am

I play trench and escalating all the time and love it.
Image
User avatar
Captain ooge
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:31 am
Location: under a bridge

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Lord Arioch on Wed Mar 19, 2014 2:37 am

Me too
Feudal epic, fog, esc, trench LOVE it!
User avatar
Lieutenant Lord Arioch
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:43 am
Location: Mostly at work

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Koganosi on Wed Mar 19, 2014 3:54 am

Looking at that game, it indeed looks very stupid, you manage to contain an oppenent, he still manages to grab cards though and suddenly boom, 3 set he is troopleader again!

I think stuff like this is discouraging to people to play specific settings, in this case escalating fog!

I generally dislike trench already so don't ask me all to much about it :).

Urs

Koganosi
Image
User avatar
Major Koganosi
 
Posts: 1597
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:06 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby DJPatrick on Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:56 am

Sorry to come in late here but never having heard of these changes, how big are we talkiing? I play escalating games (Feud Fog) all the time and hate to think that something ENORMOUS may soon stumble out of the darkness towards me...had a quick look but couldn't find any mention of such changes?
User avatar
Lieutenant DJPatrick
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:56 pm
Location: ipswich, queensland, Oztralia

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Koganosi on Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:11 am

DJPatrick wrote:Sorry to come in late here but never having heard of these changes, how big are we talkiing? I play escalating games (Feud Fog) all the time and hate to think that something ENORMOUS may soon stumble out of the darkness towards me...had a quick look but couldn't find any mention of such changes?


ā€¢Increase Escalating Spoils to Avoid Stalemates - Suggestion by FabledIntegral

Thread http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=200899.

Basicly above 100 troops the next set is worth 100 + 10% = 110, the one after that 110 + 10% = 121 (but lowered to 120 I thought), and so on.

Urs

Koganosi
Image
User avatar
Major Koganosi
 
Posts: 1597
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:06 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Metsfanmax on Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:17 am

I'm in the middle of a trench/escalating game right now. Yes, it's painful. But it wasn't fundamentally different before the change occurred; it's just that the troop counts are quite a bit higher now.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Geger on Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:59 am

Koganosi wrote:
DJPatrick wrote:Sorry to come in late here but never having heard of these changes, how big are we talkiing? I play escalating games (Feud Fog) all the time and hate to think that something ENORMOUS may soon stumble out of the darkness towards me...had a quick look but couldn't find any mention of such changes?


ā€¢Increase Escalating Spoils to Avoid Stalemates - Suggestion by FabledIntegral

Thread http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=200899.

Basicly above 100 troops the next set is worth 100 + 10% = 110, the one after that 110 + 10% = 121 (but lowered to 120 I thought), and so on.

Urs

Koganosi


I don't get it :?

Game 13707092

the last set was 265 :
2014-03-19 18:19:02 - Shaqua Khan played a set of B11, G08, and S10 worth 265 troops

and the next will be 270
Major Geger
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Sumatra

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Metsfanmax on Wed Mar 19, 2014 8:11 am

Geger wrote:
Koganosi wrote:
DJPatrick wrote:Sorry to come in late here but never having heard of these changes, how big are we talkiing? I play escalating games (Feud Fog) all the time and hate to think that something ENORMOUS may soon stumble out of the darkness towards me...had a quick look but couldn't find any mention of such changes?


ā€¢Increase Escalating Spoils to Avoid Stalemates - Suggestion by FabledIntegral

Thread http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=200899.

Basicly above 100 troops the next set is worth 100 + 10% = 110, the one after that 110 + 10% = 121 (but lowered to 120 I thought), and so on.

Urs

Koganosi


I don't get it :?

Game 13707092

the last set was 265 :
2014-03-19 18:19:02 - Shaqua Khan played a set of B11, G08, and S10 worth 265 troops

and the next will be 270


This game was probably created before the change went live; the change was not applied retroactively.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Geger on Wed Mar 19, 2014 8:37 am

Metsfanmax wrote:
Geger wrote:
Koganosi wrote:
DJPatrick wrote:Sorry to come in late here but never having heard of these changes, how big are we talkiing? I play escalating games (Feud Fog) all the time and hate to think that something ENORMOUS may soon stumble out of the darkness towards me...had a quick look but couldn't find any mention of such changes?


ā€¢Increase Escalating Spoils to Avoid Stalemates - Suggestion by FabledIntegral

Thread http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=200899.

Basicly above 100 troops the next set is worth 100 + 10% = 110, the one after that 110 + 10% = 121 (but lowered to 120 I thought), and so on.

Urs

Koganosi


I don't get it :?

Game 13707092

the last set was 265 :
2014-03-19 18:19:02 - Shaqua Khan played a set of B11, G08, and S10 worth 265 troops

and the next will be 270


This game was probably created before the change went live; the change was not applied retroactively.


I see. My bad :oops:
Major Geger
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Sumatra

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby subprime on Thu Mar 20, 2014 3:41 pm

I love the change b/ of the impact it's had on standard, non trench escalating games. No longer near as likely to stalemate, thanks CC :D
User avatar
Lieutenant subprime
 
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:27 am
3

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby The Poet on Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:56 pm

YES!!! Put Escalating back the way it was! It's getting to high with the Trench games I'm playing with friends. We lost the real challenge and fun of it. TOO HIGH!!! The people who agreed with that were not enjoying the TRench at all, nor the Escalating even.

The Poet
User avatar
Cook The Poet
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Montreal

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby redspyder on Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:43 pm

The Poet wrote:YES!!! Put Escalating back the way it was! It's getting to high with the Trench games I'm playing with friends. We lost the real challenge and fun of it. TOO HIGH!!! The people who agreed with that were not enjoying the TRench at all, nor the Escalating even.

The Poet


Strongly agree with The Poet... The new escalating spoils may work fine with your regular sunny escalating games since most don't last much past 100+ spoils anyways. But it's killed all trench escalating games (a setting I loved and played a lot before) by increasing too quickly; Once spoils get crazy, it's virtually impossible to trap or move around the map because the next set played is going to wipe out virtually ANY stack you have. Even with these settings before I never had a stalemate, but now virtually ALL large escalating trench games look like they're going to stalemate. The new spoils have made this setting unplayable.

Less grievous, fog escalating games swing a little too much on cards in my opinion. Yes, games may end sooner, but I think you're rewarding luck in cards over game play.

Lastly, fog trench escalating round limit games are no longer viable. I've played many 5 player / 20 round limit games. It's a standard build up, keep getting cards, hold on for the win. Unfortunately, with the spoils gaining 10% each set, those last few rounds of spoils can vary by more than 100+ troops. You're rewarding turn order (who plays last) instead of who played best throughout the game, more than ever before.


Long story short... One perceived issue was "fixed" with the new escalating spoils and changed the dynamic negatively in many more less played escalating settings. I don't see this as a positive improvement for this site. Consider this a vote for changing things back.
User avatar
Major redspyder
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:41 pm

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby IcePack on Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:51 pm

Add me as a +1 return to standard (old) escalating sets. I love(d) esc but think the new system is just bad from what ive experienced & seen
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16631
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby BigBallinStalin on Mon Apr 28, 2014 10:19 pm

Add a poll. That would be more useful.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby spiesr on Mon Apr 28, 2014 11:07 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:Add a poll. That would be more useful.
Okay
User avatar
Captain spiesr
 
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby redspyder on Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:41 am

A bug regarding the max number of troops. This seems to be connected to the new escalating spoils.... And it's only in round 90. :-s

viewtopic.php?f=506&t=205184
User avatar
Major redspyder
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:41 pm

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby IcePack on Fri Jun 06, 2014 3:24 pm

Yeah these new ones are causing troops to go into way big numbers way too soon, especially for trench.

viewtopic.php?f=57&t=204898&view=unread#p4485900
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16631
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Metsfanmax on Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:31 pm

This isn't really related to the escalating issue but just to the poor way that we handle large numbers of rolls, which almost certainly needs to be revamped at some point.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby IcePack on Tue Jun 10, 2014 11:27 am

Metsfanmax wrote:This isn't really related to the escalating issue but just to the poor way that we handle large numbers of rolls, which almost certainly needs to be revamped at some point.


But since that hasn't been addressed, for now it can be reverted back to the original esc so the game is playable until those mass dice rolls are fixed.
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16631
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Put Esq back the way it was

Postby Lindax on Tue Jun 10, 2014 11:34 am

Since the possibility of a stalemate inspired the change in escalating, and we now have the round limit feature to avoid stalemates, I vote for returning to the previous system.

Lx
"Winning Solves Everything" - Graeko
User avatar
Colonel Lindax
Tournament Director
Tournament Director
 
Posts: 11035
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:58 pm
Location: Paradise Rediscovered

Next

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users