morph wrote:in general... last election we had shitty presidental choices anyways...
Very true, I hated both Kerry and Bush.
Moderator: Community Team
morph wrote:in general... last election we had shitty presidental choices anyways...
strike wolf wrote:morph wrote:in general... last election we had shitty presidental choices anyways...
Very true, I hated both Kerry and Bush.
reverend_kyle wrote:strike wolf wrote:morph wrote:in general... last election we had shitty presidental choices anyways...
Very true, I hated both Kerry and Bush.
yeah.. but kerry was obviously the lesser of two evils...
reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:who won the state in 2000 2004 and what party has won it in every election since 1948...
Well I guess my vote doesn't count either. NY has not gone Republican since Reagan. But I still vote hoping NYer's will wake up some day.
but you DID endorse the sucky president that VT was trying to pin me to.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
reverend_kyle wrote:yeah.. but kerry was obviously the lesser of two evils...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:who won the state in 2000 2004 and what party has won it in every election since 1948...
Well I guess my vote doesn't count either. NY has not gone Republican since Reagan. But I still vote hoping NYer's will wake up some day.
but you DID endorse the sucky president that VT was trying to pin me to.
Sucky president???? Although Bush isn't the best we've had in recent decades (refering to Reagan here) He is a heck of alot better than Clinton (who by the way SOLD N KOREA our nuke techknoledgy) And GORE???? Give me a break. KERRY ???? ROFL get real.
reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:who won the state in 2000 2004 and what party has won it in every election since 1948...
Well I guess my vote doesn't count either. NY has not gone Republican since Reagan. But I still vote hoping NYer's will wake up some day.
but you DID endorse the sucky president that VT was trying to pin me to.
Sucky president???? Although Bush isn't the best we've had in recent decades (refering to Reagan here) He is a heck of alot better than Clinton (who by the way SOLD N KOREA our nuke techknoledgy) And GORE???? Give me a break. KERRY ???? ROFL get real.
Name one good thing bush has done except for take away our Civil Liberties
that is good because its like stephen colbert said, "The Terrorist hate us for a reason. It's because we are free. We need to stop PDF. That's right, Public display's of freedom. THat's why they want to attack us. Once we stop being free, they'll stop attacking us."
/sarcasm
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:who won the state in 2000 2004 and what party has won it in every election since 1948...
Well I guess my vote doesn't count either. NY has not gone Republican since Reagan. But I still vote hoping NYer's will wake up some day.
but you DID endorse the sucky president that VT was trying to pin me to.
Sucky president???? Although Bush isn't the best we've had in recent decades (refering to Reagan here) He is a heck of alot better than Clinton (who by the way SOLD N KOREA our nuke techknoledgy) And GORE???? Give me a break. KERRY ???? ROFL get real.
Name one good thing bush has done except for take away our Civil Liberties
that is good because its like stephen colbert said, "The Terrorist hate us for a reason. It's because we are free. We need to stop PDF. That's right, Public display's of freedom. THat's why they want to attack us. Once we stop being free, they'll stop attacking us."
/sarcasm
My God that guy sounds like a liberal! Who is he?
Lets see what has Bush done??
1.) He gave a tax cut lifting us out of a resession due to 911.
2.) He had the cahoonas to go after those responcible for 911.
reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:who won the state in 2000 2004 and what party has won it in every election since 1948...
Well I guess my vote doesn't count either. NY has not gone Republican since Reagan. But I still vote hoping NYer's will wake up some day.
but you DID endorse the sucky president that VT was trying to pin me to.
Sucky president???? Although Bush isn't the best we've had in recent decades (refering to Reagan here) He is a heck of alot better than Clinton (who by the way SOLD N KOREA our nuke techknoledgy) And GORE???? Give me a break. KERRY ???? ROFL get real.
Name one good thing bush has done except for take away our Civil Liberties
that is good because its like stephen colbert said, "The Terrorist hate us for a reason. It's because we are free. We need to stop PDF. That's right, Public display's of freedom. THat's why they want to attack us. Once we stop being free, they'll stop attacking us."
/sarcasm
My God that guy sounds like a liberal! Who is he?
Lets see what has Bush done??
1.) He gave a tax cut lifting us out of a resession due to 911.
2.) He had the cahoonas to go after those responcible for 911.
You obviously haven't seen the colbert report....
He sounds exactly like Bill O'Reilly.... And that was him DEFENDING bush...
I guess liberals do that now... you know because you disagree with it...
its funny how your paradigm shifts when you know whos saying stuff...
He gave a tax cut to the richest 2% thats not good thats counterproductive.. and he did that while starting a war which caused an 87 billion dollar deficit....
Oh and he had the cahoonas to go after someone the CIA has proven had nothing to do with 9/11 while he still hasnt found Bin laden who was and has admitted that Bin Laden wasn't even in his priorities...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:who won the state in 2000 2004 and what party has won it in every election since 1948...
Well I guess my vote doesn't count either. NY has not gone Republican since Reagan. But I still vote hoping NYer's will wake up some day.
but you DID endorse the sucky president that VT was trying to pin me to.
Sucky president???? Although Bush isn't the best we've had in recent decades (refering to Reagan here) He is a heck of alot better than Clinton (who by the way SOLD N KOREA our nuke techknoledgy) And GORE???? Give me a break. KERRY ???? ROFL get real.
Name one good thing bush has done except for take away our Civil Liberties
that is good because its like stephen colbert said, "The Terrorist hate us for a reason. It's because we are free. We need to stop PDF. That's right, Public display's of freedom. THat's why they want to attack us. Once we stop being free, they'll stop attacking us."
/sarcasm
My God that guy sounds like a liberal! Who is he?
Lets see what has Bush done??
1.) He gave a tax cut lifting us out of a resession due to 911.
2.) He had the cahoonas to go after those responcible for 911.
You obviously haven't seen the colbert report....
He sounds exactly like Bill O'Reilly.... And that was him DEFENDING bush...
I guess liberals do that now... you know because you disagree with it...
its funny how your paradigm shifts when you know whos saying stuff...
He gave a tax cut to the richest 2% thats not good thats counterproductive.. and he did that while starting a war which caused an 87 billion dollar deficit....
Oh and he had the cahoonas to go after someone the CIA has proven had nothing to do with 9/11 while he still hasnt found Bin laden who was and has admitted that Bin Laden wasn't even in his priorities...
Nothing has shifted, and I don't CARE who said it or WHY. They STILL sound like a liberal.
He did not give a tax cut the the "richest 2%" AND it got us OUT of a resession! You see, tax cuts are good as Reagan demonstrated in the 80's. It premote GROWTH in the ecconomy.
I was refering to AFGHANISTAN not Iraq. And just because Michael Moore made a butt load of money selling you false information doesn't make it accurate. The facts are Saddam trained terrorists and harbored them. And if there was one guy on the face of the planet that was a threat to give wMD's to terrorists it was SADDAM! Wake up.... moveon.org is leftist propaghanda.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:Sometimes kyle you make no sense at all. But its JUST like the LEFT! BLAME AMERICA!!!!! Its OUR fault Saddam was in power! It was our fault the terrorists came to AMERICA and took flight lessons. 911 was the FAULT of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA!!!!!!! (and so is global warming, human suffering, hurricane Katrina, the earthquake in Indonisia) GIVE ME A BREAK!!!! If you hate AMERICA SO MUCH LET ME BUY YOU A TICKET OUTTA HERE!
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:
No crap! Reagan gave Saddam weapons to use against IRAN.
jay_a2j wrote:Your buddy Clinton had an oppertunity to arrest Bin Laden in 1998 but didn't....but we overlooked that
Bill Clinton, Hillary and Kerry all said Saddam was a threat and had wmd's....but we overlooked that
you can't defend the indefencable
reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:
No crap! Reagan gave Saddam weapons to use against IRAN.
So, Its ok to give Saddam someone who in your words "is an evil man and likely to give weapons to terrorists".. when reagan does it?
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:
No crap! Reagan gave Saddam weapons to use against IRAN.
So, Its ok to give Saddam someone who in your words "is an evil man and likely to give weapons to terrorists".. when reagan does it?
In the 80's we weren't concered about "terrorists".
The origins of al-Qaeda can be traced to a few weeks after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979,
reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:
No crap! Reagan gave Saddam weapons to use against IRAN.
So, Its ok to give Saddam someone who in your words "is an evil man and likely to give weapons to terrorists".. when reagan does it?
In the 80's we weren't concered about "terrorists".The origins of al-Qaeda can be traced to a few weeks after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Qaeda
how do you know this new government we put in Iraq wont be the same as when we put saddam into power and gave him weapons?
strike wolf wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:
No crap! Reagan gave Saddam weapons to use against IRAN.
So, Its ok to give Saddam someone who in your words "is an evil man and likely to give weapons to terrorists".. when reagan does it?
In the 80's we weren't concered about "terrorists".The origins of al-Qaeda can be traced to a few weeks after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Qaeda
how do you know this new government we put in Iraq wont be the same as when we put saddam into power and gave him weapons?
At the time we gave him weapons, we considered Iran to be a greater terrorist threat.
was refering to AFGHANISTAN not Iraq. And just because Michael Moore made a butt load of money selling you false information doesn't make it accurate. The facts are Saddam trained terrorists and harbored them
yet they bombed the world trade center back than! Maybe we should have been concerned. But... We thought Saddam was going to play nice and allow us a pipline out of his country and through Afghanistan but he didn't... he sold his oil to the Germans and the French instead. hummmm. I wonder why those French fries became freedom fires? Could all that spin have been an axe to grind? Speaking of the French the Right loves to bash them about how we bailed them out in WW2... yet was it not them that came and helped us beat the British out of America? Were they not one of the only countries to come to our aid when we wanted independance. A little over 200 years is a long time... But those 200 may not have happend had it not been for the French... yet now our government pushes us to despise them... And we wonder why the rest of the world sees us a backstabbers?In the 80's we weren't concered about "terrorists".
have to call BS on this one. iran did not gas it's on people. iran did not use WMD's on it's own villages. Iraq did. We went against the UN to aid the iraqis. The reason we helped them was because, we thought, iraq would let us into the OIL fields. Whereas Iran never would or prabably ever will!At the time we gave him weapons, we considered Iran to be a greater terrorist threat.
Return to Out, out, brief candle!
Users browsing this forum: bigtoughralf, jusplay4fun