Moderator: Community Team
kgb007 wrote:wow very surprised we're already at D2, i'm not sure what we can really learn from such a short night though
maybe instead of two scum buddies, there's only 1? that would cut down on the discussion period since there's no one to consult with
Anarkistsdream wrote:Fircoal wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Fircoal wrote:Something important to note. For whatever reason the night only lasted 20 hours. That leads me to believe there was some quick communication going on.
I agree, but we've all been fairly communicative in the thread... Fairly.
Yes. something else to note is that communicating with each other over that time would be hard, so likely the two scummy scums were both on at the same time or one of them decided to send in the action themselves.
And hoping we have town power roles, they would have had to act extremely quickly, also.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
kgb007 wrote:wow very surprised we're already at D2, i'm not sure what we can really learn from such a short night though
maybe instead of two scum buddies, there's only 1? that would cut down on the discussion period since there's no one to consult with
Iron Butterfly wrote:I also find it funny the both of you are trying to make it sound like there is just 1 mafia, which would only help mafia.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Iron Butterfly wrote:kgb007 wrote:wow very surprised we're already at D2, i'm not sure what we can really learn from such a short night though
maybe instead of two scum buddies, there's only 1? that would cut down on the discussion period since there's no one to consult with
Perhaps you should re-read the opening scene.
We had a short night? So what. Its a small game with some VT.
Iron Butterfly wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:OK, so let's break this down...
2 Prisoners
6 Townies (unless there is a third party, which I don't see Spiesr putting one in such a small game)
Out of those townies, what do you guys think? One cop, one doc? Maybe a JOAT, instead of two separate roles?
[color=#FF0000He said it was a basic game, so I wouldn't think the scum have any roles at all. ][/color]
This first day lynch is going to be critical, more so than most games because of the small number of players and the fact that there are only two enemies.
I also found this post interesting in that you really try to minimize the roles this game may have especially mafia.
As I stated earlier Spiesr said this is a newb friendly game not a basic game. That does not mean mafia can not have roles.
Unlike you I don't sit on the fence
vote Anarkistsdream
Iron Butterfly wrote:I would like Firecoal to explain why a short night is so important as it offers nothing to the game other then to make it sound like that info is important.
Weather the mafia action was sent in by one person or they both conferred with each other is irrelevant as they still got a night kill and you will never know the answer to your speculation.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
JamesKer1 wrote:Vote nark. Greg was quieter but voted you. Easy way to make it look like you aren't going after someone if you are mafia, but his only substantial vote was against you I believe, maybe one on IB. With the "quick communication", it actually IS important- it suggests how one sided the conversation is. A person who was killed off and on your wagon could save you today.
Also you seem to be pushing to find town power roles... Is that not suspicious?
And on top of all this and the previous suspicion, I REALLY don't like how much your first D2 post pointed to me. I am the only new person here and I post quite a bit... And I am definitely not mafia.
Let's bring back the wagon from where we left off... And don't let nark plead his innocence this time and get it taken off
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Iron Butterfly wrote:You are mighty defensive in regards to answering a simple question Firecoal and your response is complete WIFOM based on supposed meta. Having a quick night offers NOTHING to who did what.
Second you completely twisted my statement in response Anarchy I said,
"I also found this post interesting in that you really try to minimize the roles this game may have especially mafia.
As I stated earlier Spiesr said this is a newb friendly game not a basic game. That does not mean mafia can not have roles."
It was suggested that scum would not have any roles at all. I strongly stand by my above statement.
Iron Butterfly wrote:Not to add it gets us a better idea of what we have in the town. Yes I forgot there were confirmed two mafia members but what if there were not? It'd be better for us to kick around the possibility. I find it funny how you are the one to remember that for sure there are 2 mafia, while both me and Kgb forget. Maybe there is a reason for that. ;3
Load of crap this statement. The reason I know is that when you suggested this "theory" I reread the opening scene again. Something you were either to to lazy to do before opining, not Once but twice or because you were hoping to plant that seed in peoples minds hoping no one would notice.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:Yes. something else to note is that communicating with each other over that time would be hard, so likely the two scummy scums were both on at the same time or one of them decided to send in the action themselves.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Of course, due to my thought processes, that immediately makes me think the scum is someone decently new to mafia... Of course, someone with experience doesn't kill off the people who post a lot because THOSE are the people who typically get into linguistic trouble...
Iron Butterfly wrote:I also find it funny the both of you are trying to make it sound like there is just 1 mafia, which would only help mafia.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Anybody with a brain who has ever played mafia knows better than to go after someone going after them... beyond that, your post is laughably ridiculous.. Why go after him with his one vote andZERO posts when people like IB are hardassing me?
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
Anarkistsdream wrote:Anybody with a brain who has ever played mafia knows better than to go after someone going after them... beyond that, your post is laughably ridiculous.. Why go after him with his one vote andZERO posts when people like IB are hardassing me?JamesKer1 wrote:Vote nark. Greg was quieter but voted you. Easy way to make it look like you aren't going after someone if you are mafia, but his only substantial vote was against you I believe, maybe one on IB. With the "quick communication", it actually IS important- it suggests how one sided the conversation is. A person who was killed off and on your wagon could save you today.
Also you seem to be pushing to find town power roles... Is that not suspicious?
And on top of all this and the previous suspicion, I REALLY don't like how much your first D2 post pointed to me. I am the only new person here and I post quite a bit... And I am definitely not mafia.
Let's bring back the wagon from where we left off... And don't let nark plead his innocence this time and get it taken off
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
The Weird One wrote:First off, sorry for the delay. Exam in twelve hours. Last one for a couple of weeks, though...so at least there's that.
Now that that's out of the way, here comes the disjointed sleep-deprived ramblings. Enjoy!
Nark, you say that you have suspicions...would you care to share with the class?
Fircoal, you say that it's surprising to have had such a short night or that it speaks of some high level of inactivity. . . You do realize that all players and the mod are from the states, right? There's not that much of a time gap, so it would make sense that it would be resolved quickly. Twenty hours is a bit quick, but with everyone clustered so tightly [regarding time zones], it's not that out of place. It almost seems that you're trying to shift the attention toward the actives when you yourself have been less active [I know you have been inactive due to real life, but that doesn't stop it from appearing that you're trying to slide attention far away from you]
Post in question:Fircoal wrote:Yes. something else to note is that communicating with each other over that time would be hard, so likely the two scummy scums were both on at the same time or one of them decided to send in the action themselves.
Random question to Nark:Anarkistsdream wrote:Of course, due to my thought processes, that immediately makes me think the scum is someone decently new to mafia... Of course, someone with experience doesn't kill off the people who post a lot because THOSE are the people who typically get into linguistic trouble...
Was there an ironic typo here? If not, please explain your reasoning...I'm baffled, honestly.
I find myself agreeing with the point IB brings up:Iron Butterfly wrote:I also find it funny the both of you are trying to make it sound like there is just 1 mafia, which would only help mafia.
Not really related to anything, but screw it, this is my disjointed ramble, I can have as little cohesion as I damn well please! ...This line from you, nark, makes me laugh a bit...using this -admittedly sensible- line of reasoning, couldn't an experienced scum get away with killing people that were heading up their lynch mobs during night one and two using this logic as protection? Since they're experienced, nobody would assume it was them...anyway, back to some semblance of a topic...Anarkistsdream wrote:Anybody with a brain who has ever played mafia knows better than to go after someone going after them... beyond that, your post is laughably ridiculous.. Why go after him with his one vote andZERO posts when people like IB are hardassing me?
And, for the love of the gods, can somebody please explain what the Hell WIFOM means aside from "whine in front of me"....I'm all kinds of confused...and humiliated by said confusion....
So, yes...those are my thoughts thus far...hope they make more sense to you than to me...and I hope I can post something moderately coherent, tomorrow, after the exam.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
Iron Butterfly wrote:Everything you offer up has been pure speculation or based in half truth. I call your arguments WIFOM for a reason. (wine in front of me)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_eZmEiyTo0
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
The Weird One wrote: Fircoal, you say that it's surprising to have had such a short night or that it speaks of some high level of inactivity. . . You do realize that all players and the mod are from the states, right? There's not that much of a time gap, so it would make sense that it would be resolved quickly. Twenty hours is a bit quick, but with everyone clustered so tightly [regarding time zones], it's not that out of place. It almost seems that you're trying to shift the attention toward the actives when you yourself have been less active [I know you have been inactive due to real life, but that doesn't stop it from appearing that you're trying to slide attention far away from you]
Post in question:Fircoal wrote:Yes. something else to note is that communicating with each other over that time would be hard, so likely the two scummy scums were both on at the same time or one of them decided to send in the action themselves.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Iron Butterfly wrote:I also find it funny the both of you are trying to make it sound like there is just 1 mafia, which would only help mafia.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Anarkistsdream wrote:JamesKer1 wrote:Sorry to see you go Greg. Definitely not someone I was expecting...
Nor I... As seldom as he was posting, I didn't understand the need to off him so quickly...
Of course, due to my thought processes, that immediately makes me think the scum is someone decently new to mafia... Of course, someone with experience doesn't kill off the people who post a lot because THOSE are the people who typically get into linguistic trouble...
JamesKer1 wrote:Vote nark. Greg was quieter but voted you. Easy way to make it look like you aren't going after someone if you are mafia, but his only substantial vote was against you I believe, maybe one on IB. With the "quick communication", it actually IS important- it suggests how one sided the conversation is. A person who was killed off and on your wagon could save you today.
Also you seem to be pushing to find town power roles... Is that not suspicious?
And on top of all this and the previous suspicion, I REALLY don't like how much your first D2 post pointed to me. I am the only new person here and I post quite a bit... And I am definitely not mafia.
Let's bring back the wagon from where we left off... And don't let nark plead his innocence this time and get it taken off
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
JamesKer1 wrote:Why does everything have to be WIFOM? WIFOM here, WIFOM there, WIFOM Everywhere(116? Remember that from somewhere...)
Can't an argument JUST MAKE SENSE?
JamesKer1 wrote:And why does everyone attribute the quick night to me? I would try to be quick as a town PR and think about my target in advance, but as a mafia I would talk over stuff with my scumbuddy- and I definitely don't have time to talk with someone consistently, my time I can spend on here is random and erratic.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
kgb007 wrote:did greg even post that much in D1 though?
JamesKer1 wrote:Greg was quieter but voted you. Easy way to make it look like you aren't going after someone if you are mafia, but his only substantial vote was against you I believe, maybe one on IB.
spiesr wrote:Fear began to grip the citizens of Waterdale. They knew the escaped convicts had infiltrated their midsts and soon no one knew who to trust. They tried hunt for the hidden danger but everywhere they searched they only found that which seemed to belong. As the sun hung low in the sky the search was called off. No one wanted to be caught out at night with those men on the loose. The citizens retired to their homes looking back at what they are feared may be their last sunset.
spiesr wrote:JamesKer1, in the future please use the word "Vote" when voting.
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
JamesKer1 wrote:kgb007 wrote:did greg even post that much in D1 though?
NO. I said this in the quote below, which you already quoted. Not a bad thing, I respect his playing style- just a statement of fact.JamesKer1 wrote:Greg was quieter but voted you. Easy way to make it look like you aren't going after someone if you are mafia, but his only substantial vote was against you I believe, maybe one on IB.
[quote"kgb007"]nark - i'd like to hear more about your suspicions, as you explain the quick night phase as being within James' behavior, and it draws a quick OMGUS-ish vote from James
spiesr wrote:Fear began to grip the citizens of Waterdale. They knew the escaped convicts had infiltrated their midsts and soon no one knew who to trust. They tried hunt for the hidden danger but everywhere they searched they only found that which seemed to belong. As the sun hung low in the sky the search was called off. No one wanted to be caught out at night with those men on the loose. The citizens retired to their homes looking back at what they are feared may be their last sunset.
spiesr wrote:JamesKer1, in the future please use the word "Vote" when voting.
Stephan Wayne wrote:Every day is Fool's Day on CC.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users