Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Mageplunka69 wrote:He is a moron, he foes me for the same reason....foe him and move on
I asked him numerous times to remove it.....but he is a idiot
citizencane86 wrote:Accused:
afroaction
The accused are suspected of:
Other: (Ratings Abuse)
The accused did not like the fact that I joined 4 of his games in a row (casual). As a result, he foed me and gave me 0 ratings with the tags "cheap tactics".
This was a result of me winning 3/4, period. He complained in all games that I started first, therefore, it was cheap.
For the record, the accused has over 16, 000 games played. Someone joining 4 games in a row justifies a foe? Why make 4 games if you did not want someone to join them.
Comment on my wall:
by afroaction
on Sat May 25, 2013 4:52 pm
dude, you joined 5 of my games in row, foed
Game number(s):
Game 12795096
Game 12795094
Game 12795050
Game 12795020
Funkyterrance wrote:Yeah so the issue is the bad rating. Once the guy was foed, why give him the cheap tactics tag? Doesn't sound like anything cheap to me, just something people do. Generally speaking you should be able to at least come out even playing against a cadet for 5 games anyway right?
Mageplunka69 wrote:He is a moron, he foes me for the same reason....foe him and move on
I asked him numerous times to remove it.....but he is a idiot
rhp 1 wrote:HOLY SHIT! get over yourself.... does it really hurt ur e- feelings that bad to have some random dude give u an inadequate amount of stars for ur performance on a gaming website and take the time to "report" him?!?!? I'm not gonna take the time to look, but I'd bet Afro isn't the first player to rate you poorly on here... chances are, you're not a very good player, and ur feelings are easily hurt, evidenced by this whiny bitch report, and most likely deserve the ratings u get... and if Afro thought it was cheap of you to rape his points *small chuckle* then that's what he thought... foe and move on with your apparently sad existence... I have no evidence that ur pathetic, just a gut feeling...
Take care now!
bigg chief wrote:who cares ratings are a waste of time,FAMO !! foe and move on !! quit crying about ratings
afroaction wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Yeah so the issue is the bad rating. Once the guy was foed, why give him the cheap tactics tag? Doesn't sound like anything cheap to me, just something people do. Generally speaking you should be able to at least come out even playing against a cadet for 5 games anyway right?
I was on line at the same time as he was, and if I didn't foe as quick as I did once i saw him joining the other 2, he would joined the remaining 10 games i had open.
Symmetry wrote:afroaction wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Yeah so the issue is the bad rating. Once the guy was foed, why give him the cheap tactics tag? Doesn't sound like anything cheap to me, just something people do. Generally speaking you should be able to at least come out even playing against a cadet for 5 games anyway right?
I was on line at the same time as he was, and if I didn't foe as quick as I did once i saw him joining the other 2, he would joined the remaining 10 games i had open.
So you used the ratings system as a form of revenge? I do think you need to clarify what you were doing with the rating here dude. I think you're pretty safe from the mods, but you're coming off as a bit dodgy, when an honest answer would save time.
afroaction wrote:Symmetry wrote:afroaction wrote:Funkyterrance wrote:Yeah so the issue is the bad rating. Once the guy was foed, why give him the cheap tactics tag? Doesn't sound like anything cheap to me, just something people do. Generally speaking you should be able to at least come out even playing against a cadet for 5 games anyway right?
I was on line at the same time as he was, and if I didn't foe as quick as I did once i saw him joining the other 2, he would joined the remaining 10 games i had open.
So you used the ratings system as a form of revenge? I do think you need to clarify what you were doing with the rating here dude. I think you're pretty safe from the mods, but you're coming off as a bit dodgy, when an honest answer would save time.
It's not revenge, it's rating someone accordingly of how i felt of his/her game play and attitude.
Seriously, if I filed a report on every bad rating I've received, this forum would be over incapacitated. I don't, but again I accept them for what they are and move on. Only wish people could do the same. These bogus rating abuse is getting old, not just for me but for everybody.
Besides, I had my suspicions of Citizen being a multi, but I let sleeping dogs lay because he played a little too well for someone that has less 200 games under his belt, now to file a report against would only be seen as retaliatory.
karel wrote:wow what a waste of time,foe and move on,should be banned for writing this stupid ass report
afroaction wrote:Sym, you sure know a lot about nothing for a person with 66 games completed, or do you just keep this account open just to post in C & A wanna be mod non-sense.
Look at the settings, manual/ trench/ nukes, the 3 of 4 games he play against me He played first, 90% advantage there. Where's the skill in that? Starts with a bonus, and kills any way i can counter attack? That's worth a 3 star at best for being lucky?
Symmetry wrote:afroaction wrote:Sym, you sure know a lot about nothing for a person with 66 games completed, or do you just keep this account open just to post in C & A wanna be mod non-sense.
Look at the settings, manual/ trench/ nukes, the 3 of 4 games he play against me He played first, 90% advantage there. Where's the skill in that? Starts with a bonus, and kills any way i can counter attack? That's worth a 3 star at best for being lucky?
I'm kinda glad you did your research on me, but I think you're looking for revenge in the wrong place. Post your evidence, dude.
afroaction wrote:Symmetry wrote:afroaction wrote:Sym, you sure know a lot about nothing for a person with 66 games completed, or do you just keep this account open just to post in C & A wanna be mod non-sense.
Look at the settings, manual/ trench/ nukes, the 3 of 4 games he play against me He played first, 90% advantage there. Where's the skill in that? Starts with a bonus, and kills any way i can counter attack? That's worth a 3 star at best for being lucky?
I'm kinda glad you did your research on me, but I think you're looking for revenge in the wrong place. Post your evidence, dude.
Think what you will, that's why you're always going to be a wanna be.
afroaction wrote:citizencane86
Games:
175 completed, 52 (30%) won
Attendance:
95% of turns taken
Rating:
Star 4.4
He's received 50 ratings from 50 other players, My single rating has no affect his overall rating average. 95% turns taken, deadbeat. Need more? Someone joining 4; 1 vs 1 and another bunch my of multi-player games which I dropped & foed as soon as I caught on to his ulterior agenda other then being a point hog or whatever motive he had against me? Cheap. You don't see me ever going on anyone's wall, click on all his games and joining all his open games at once.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users