open diplomacy msshields and fantassin[Cleared]TFO

by **egerskydiver** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:19 pm

game 12455594
Accused:

msshields
fantassin

The accused are suspected of:
unfair diplomacy

Game number(s):12455594

Comments: they talked openly about 1.saving one (red, = fantassin) in having bonuses for africa 2.about a plan to attack me in NA together to take my bonus away.

examples from chat:
1. 2013-03-06 22:18:09 - mshields: not much more i can do
2013-03-06 22:18:12 - mshields: i'll let you have africa

2. mshields: hey red...leave a 1 in bogota and i'll try and break mexico city
2013-03-06 22:05:12 - mshields: or youc an try
2013-03-06 22:05:13 - mshields: and if you don't
2013-03-06 22:05:16 - mshields: then i'll try
2013-03-06 22:05:40 - mshields: but leave a 1 in bogota so it'll be easier to get ther
2013-03-06 22:05:46 - mshields: or not
2013-03-06 22:06:28 - Fantassin: sorry didn't see til now

Waiting for your reaction!
greetz,

egerskydiver

by **mshields** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:26 pm

LOL

Blue was clearly in the lead so I let red have africa at the time...

It was openly discussed in the chat

I'm not even sure why I'm defending myself here as this is just awful

by **rishaed** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:29 pm

This isn't a crime, part of risk is Diplomacy. Now if you can prove SECRET DIPLOMACY thats another matter. Secret diplomacy is a violation of the rules, and as such is punishable. It doesn't look like anything here is wrong.

by **Edric Wolfswift** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:34 pm

This report is frivolous at best. You accuse them of "open diplomacy" and the form says "being multis".

First of all... how is the diplomacy illegal if it is OPEN?

Second... why accuse them of being multies?

by **egerskydiver** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:41 pm

being multis means playing two in common, I thought!

by **rishaed** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:42 pm

egerskydiver wrote:being multis means playing two in common, I thought!

GO click on the link up top that says RULES, and read the page. It'll help before you fill out another report.

by **Edric Wolfswift** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:45 pm

You joined over three years ago, have played almost 10000 games, and you don't know what a multi is????

by **mshields** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:48 pm

the title now says, "open diplomacy"

like i said...

L.O.L.

by **egerskydiver** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:50 pm

you give no answers but only have a question, I know multi games aren't that doubles, triples etc.?

by **mshields** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:54 pm

Multis are people who sign up 2 accounts and are the same person and use both accounts to up each others ranks.

by **egerskydiver** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:55 pm

ok thanks , then I am wrong in the title

by **mshields** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:59 pm

Can you now explain how it was unfair?

by **egerskydiver** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:03 pm

let the admins just tell! What you did in the chat is working together speaking about how to finish my bonus and telling your 'companion' you save his bonus;

by **Edric Wolfswift** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:44 pm

Direct quote frokm the rules... "Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating assaults."

If they openly discuss it in the chat, as they did, there is nothing illegal.

by **TheForgivenOne** on Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:27 pm

Cleared. Diplomacy is allowed on the site, as long as it is discussed in the Game chat. If they were communicating via wall/PM/etc, then we could take action, but they did nothing wrong.