Know Your Spoils Standard [WINNER: hmsps]!!

by **m1ndgames** on Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:49 pm

Add me in please. Thanks

by **69Chevy** on Sun Jan 06, 2013 7:34 pm

Domination_44 wrote:Sounds like a good idea, but I don't want to change anything now.......

Ah, let's give it a try

in please.

by **Wizz00** on Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:42 am

In please

by **Creeping Jesus** on Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:56 pm

in please

by **osman76** on Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:32 am

In plz

by **chidone** on Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:22 am

IN PLZ!!!!

by **overlander** on Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:01 pm

in please

by **joeaggie98** on Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:59 pm

In please

by **corner G** on Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:19 am

In please

by **Silly Knig-it** on Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:17 pm

In pls

by **RISKMAN82** on Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:02 am

In please

as advice for your tournament.

:
- world2.1 no spoils could take weeks. While lux nuclear could only take a few rounds
- if only winner take a single point, we'll finish round 1 with 36 points earned. We could easily see a tie-breaker with all players who get no victory to qualify a virtual 23rd or 24th players.... or a tie breaker with multiple players who get 1 point :
ex : 1 lucky player get 3 points
6 players get 2 points
21 players get 1 point (tie breaker to select 17 players)*
20 get 0
* I presume you would set 2 games of 6 and 1 of 5 players. 3 players will be selected. second tie breaker with 14...etc...etc
Conclusion : we willl play more tie breaker than normal games in the first round...
You should think about that.

Take it like an advice, I m not criticising your tournament at all.

sincerely

by **iamkoolerthanu** on Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:08 am

in please

by **Domination_44** on Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:57 am

RISKMAN82 wrote:In please

as advice for your tournament. :
- world2.1 no spoils could take weeks. While lux nuclear could only take a few rounds
- if only winner take a single point, we'll finish round 1 with 36 points earned. We could easily see a tie-breaker with all players who get no victory to qualify a virtual 23rd or 24th players.... or a tie breaker with multiple players who get 1 point :
ex : 1 lucky player get 3 points
6 players get 2 points
21 players get 1 point (tie breaker to select 17 players)*
20 get 0
* I presume you would set 2 games of 6 and 1 of 5 players. 3 players will be selected. second tie breaker with 14...etc...etc
Conclusion : we willl play more tie breaker than normal games in the first round...
You should think about that.

Take it like an advice, I m not criticising your tournament at all.

sincerely

I realized this only a few days ago, to change it I would have to restructure the whole tournament. So I can't change it now, the best I can do is hope that doesn't happen. If it does happen I may just send everyone to round 2 and put twice as many games instead of doing tiebreakers. As for world 2.1 taking a long time, it will, but I don't see that as a problem.. Thank you for the feedback!