agentcom wrote:A couple disparate thoughts:
First, always amazed by the different opinions different people hold on what should and should not be allowed. Generally, I would say that there's a divide that runs right down the Atlantic Ocean. The Europeans generally accept and promote rules against certain images and the Americans generally disfavor and argue against these rules. I won't bore you with all the armchair sociology that's running through my head right now.
Second, it will be interesting to see which side of the line this skull-and-bones falls on. It makes logical sense that if the swastika--a symbol of Nazism--is prohibited, the symbol of the "worst" part to the Nazi party should likewise be prohibited. However, it also makes sense that, at least in modern times, the swastika is so visually unique as to be recognized as a symbol of Nazism; whereas, a skull and crossbones could mean many things.
And third, there are plenty of reasons to hate the Nazis, but this topic has given me another one: those guys had the coolest fking uniforms and the coolest fking symbols of any army that I can think of. I mean look at those uniforms with eagles and crosses and swastikas and skull-and-bones! If they would have been the "good guys" then we all would be appropriating their symbols in our avatars. There would be high school football teams called the Jamestown Nazis with big old swastikas on their helmets and eagles on their chests. Just aesthetically, every symbol they used was simply fierce.
you clearly arent European if you think those are "cool" uniforms.
also, you all, again, are missing the difference. i have nothing but uber respect for Wehrmacht. those were exceptional soldiers and war generals, one of best world has ever seen. on other hand, there are Waffen-SS and Schutz-Staffel, both had nothing to do with soldiers. most distinguish SS officers werent even soldiers, but politicians. and those were the people wearing those "cool" uniforms. intimidating? only because we know what they represent.
and you are correct about swastika and totenkopf. swastika represents Nazi party, while totenkopf represents SS division the worst part of whole regime.
greenoaks wrote:betiko wrote:so tell me greenoaks, doyou really have problems seeing the difference? it's worse than i thought.
using a nazi symbol as your avatar is making its apology like it or not. wether persian empire knew or not that this specific skull and bone pattern is the one used by the SS is not my problem (you have to be pretty ignorant if you've lived during the WW2 like he did and not knowing that though). I don't see why swastikas wouldn't be allowed if this is allowed. both nazi symbolisms.
skull and crossbones are pirates symbols, the whole world knows that.
almost noone knows some nazis the world has never heard of also used a skull and crossbone symbol.
again, clearly non european. its not my fault you have no idea what totenkopf is.
also, pirates are not "good guys", no matter what movie you have watch, historically they were as brutal as anyone...
just to be clear, i dont give shit what someone has as their avatar, im just representing historical facts here, and those facts saying he is having SS symbol as his avatar. weather is that OK or not is not for me to say...