Moderator: Cartographers
DiM wrote:could we know what these "tangible items" are and what's a realistic time frame for getting them?
MrBenn wrote:DiM wrote:could we know what these "tangible items" are and what's a realistic time frame for getting them?
Tangible items = too little
Time frame = too late
DiM wrote:we haven't even seen tnb80's map gallery get implemented and that was supposedly a sure and easy thing. i mean the guy worked hard to create that and lack didn't even bother to put a link to the gallery somewhere in the browse maps section.
Dukasaur wrote:DiM wrote:we haven't even seen tnb80's map gallery get implemented and that was supposedly a sure and easy thing. i mean the guy worked hard to create that and lack didn't even bother to put a link to the gallery somewhere in the browse maps section.
Wow. That blows my mind.
Such a nice resource being squanderered.
Dukasaur wrote:DiM wrote:we haven't even seen tnb80's map gallery get implemented and that was supposedly a sure and easy thing. i mean the guy worked hard to create that and lack didn't even bother to put a link to the gallery somewhere in the browse maps section.
Wow. That blows my mind.
Such a nice resource being squanderered.
thenobodies80 wrote:Dukasaur wrote:DiM wrote:we haven't even seen tnb80's map gallery get implemented and that was supposedly a sure and easy thing. i mean the guy worked hard to create that and lack didn't even bother to put a link to the gallery somewhere in the browse maps section.
Wow. That blows my mind.
Such a nice resource being squanderered.
Luckily, on this thing I can give you an answer:
The map foundry gallery you can see is not the final version.
I did serveral improvements and actually I have a version 2.0 I will release soon for some community feedback....ehm ehm with community I mean you guys in the foundry since for now it's not promoted on the site.
The good news, Lack want it on the site and we are working together to have it implemented. Actually I'm waiting some inputs from him on a couple of things but we're at a good point with it.
I'm the first to love the idea to have it implemented faster, but Lack has given to me some good feedback and important advice to perform it so I decided to take some time and work with the time I have.
As said I'm almost ready with it and I'll release a version more complete and with more info/better structure soon. For the implementation part, I prefer to discuss with Lack first instead of making a promise about a "when & how" I'm not sure to respect actually.
greenoaks wrote:will there be a sortable list of the maps by such things are total terits, starting terits or special features like winning/losing conditions?
MrBenn wrote:/me yawns
DiM wrote:could we know what these "tangible items" are and what's a realistic time frame for getting them?
DiM wrote:DiM wrote:could we know what these "tangible items" are and what's a realistic time frame for getting them?
cairnswk wrote:So how much longer does this foundry avatar RIP haqve to be up...i find it quite depressing for the foundry
natty dread wrote:cairnswk wrote:So how much longer does this foundry avatar RIP haqve to be up...i find it quite depressing for the foundry
As long as it takes...
AndyDufresne wrote:Lack and King Achilles started discussing some items while I was out of the office last week, and I caught up with them this past Monday. We'll have a longer and more in-depth conversation mid-week. We're working on some actual tangible items, instead of just written promises, and I am sure we'll be in touch with the Cartos (and the rest of the Foundry here) as well.
Users browsing this forum: Pochuco