Conquer Club

The Great Lakes -- [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby Unit_2 on Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:50 pm

Updated list:


Flags:
Unit_2
dominationnation
wrightfan123
casper
Ninja-Town
haoala
Guiscard
Molacole
fluffybunnykins
Gozar

No Flags:
DiM
t.e.c
MR. Nate
wiggybowler
ruthlessontogeny
joeyjordison
luckywar
Gilligan
Image
User avatar
Cook Unit_2
 
Posts: 1834
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A, North America, Earth, Milky Way, Universe.

Postby wiggybowler on Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:28 pm

I like the flags, I just meant that it looks cleaner without them, but I would not mind it either way. This is a very good looking map
Assassin of Spamalot
Major wiggybowler
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:40 pm

Postby Skittles! on Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:21 am

With Flags. It looks better.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14574
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby Coleman on Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:29 am

I should be on the no flags list, that we don't need because the poll already shows that reason loses out to flagets.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby Molacole on Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:51 am

Unit_2 wrote:Updated list:


Flags:
Unit_2
dominationnation
wrightfan123
casper
Ninja-Town
haoala
Guiscard
Molacole
fluffybunnykins
Gozar

No Flags:
DiM
t.e.c
MR. Nate
wiggybowler
ruthlessontogeny
joeyjordison
luckywar
Gilligan


I didn't vote because I only like the two flags I mentioned, but not enough to vote for flags. I'm leaning more towards no flags, but not enough to contribute to the voting process because I like both...
User avatar
Lieutenant Molacole
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 8:19 am
Location: W 2.0 map by ZIM

Postby cairnswk on Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:44 am

Sorry WM..i have to say no flags. :?
Image
* Pearl Harbour * Waterloo * Forbidden City * Jamaica * Pot Mosbi
User avatar
Private cairnswk
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Australia

NO FLags

Postby Keredrex on Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:16 pm

NO FLAGS

I think It looks Cleaner Without the flags...
Awesome Map.... Can't Wait to play
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Keredrex
 
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:41 am
Location: New York

Postby mibi on Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:57 pm

yeah flags are silly, there are about 47 people on earth who can recognize OIhio's flag, and about 3 people who a can do it on this map.
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Postby Kugelblitz22 on Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:15 pm

If you didn't tell people they were flags most wouldn't even know. Michigan's flag for example looks a like skid mark or something...

Looking forward to playing this map no matter it rocks!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Kugelblitz22
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:36 pm
Location: Canton

Postby PimpCaneYoAss on Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:37 pm

no flags
Image
User avatar
Cadet PimpCaneYoAss
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:04 pm
Location: Connecticut

Postby WidowMakers on Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:01 pm

I am going to let the poll go for several more days. I would like to see a much more lopsided poll to determine a winner. If not I will decide.

Aside from the flags, are there any other things people see that need to be changed? If not then I will start working on the XML. And since the army numbers are centered then I don't see a problem with that aspect.
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby pancakemix on Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:09 pm

I've decided not to maul everyone to death over the territory names. I would prefer it the other way, but it's fine the way it is, and frankly, I don't want this map in the foundry forever.

And boo flags.
Epic Win

"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class pancakemix
 
Posts: 7973
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: The Grim Guzzler

Postby Janiv on Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:32 pm

I originally voted flags but after looking at the map again I had to ask myself what I was thinking. The no flags version is way better and much easier to read and so much more clear.
User avatar
Private Janiv
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:41 am
Location: Spanish Fork, UT

Postby Evil DIMwit on Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:46 pm

I think flags really give the map style. Otherwise, it just looks like a bunch of boring colored terrain.
User avatar
Captain Evil DIMwit
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Philadelphia, NJ

Postby JerenYun on Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:01 pm

I voted flags. They add more to the continents than just color. I like how it looks.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class JerenYun
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:25 am

Postby jnd94 on Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:18 pm

two thumbs up for flags. they look great and give the map some more pizzazz
Captain jnd94
 
Posts: 7177
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:22 pm

Postby Coleman on Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:21 pm

It looks like the flagets have this one... :cry:

Oh well the map looks great either way.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby WidowMakers on Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:21 pm

Well it looks like the flags won. Here are the pics with and without armies. Thanks to Coleman for doing the XML.
Large
Image
Image
Small
Image
Image
Thanks again Coleman
http://members.cox.net/gyrigo/CC/TheGreatLakes_01.xml
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby edbeard on Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:29 pm

I'll say this for the third time! :P

49 countries so you should get rid of one. :)

Or, give us an awesome reason why 49 is better than 48
User avatar
Lieutenant edbeard
 
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:41 am

Postby WidowMakers on Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:33 pm

edbeard wrote:I'll say this for the third time! :P

49 countries so you should get rid of one. :)

Or, give us an awesome reason why 49 is better than 48
Why do we need to get rid of 1? So what if there are 49. I added 1 to Illinois and kept all of the rest. There were 48 before that.
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby musicman_379 on Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:54 pm

Looks Great.

Can't wait to play the map.
Image
User avatar
Corporal musicman_379
 
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 2:22 pm
Location: SW Kansas

Postby edbeard on Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:02 pm

WidowMakers wrote:Why do we need to get rid of 1? So what if there are 49. I added 1 to Illinois and kept all of the rest. There were 48 before that.

well neutrals in every single game type versus neutrals only in a 5 man game.

If no one thinks its a big deal, then i guess whatever, but I think you should have a reason for having 49.

Like you said, you added one to Illinois so why not just take it out?
User avatar
Lieutenant edbeard
 
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:41 am

Postby Coleman on Tue May 01, 2007 3:52 pm

What's wrong with neutrals? :lol:

Futurama wrote:Tell my wife, hello.

Okay, I went through and checked the history, the 49 occurred when Ohio had a split. Illinois was split earlier to make it 48. I am not sure why Ohio or Illinois were split though. I am assuming it had something to do with continent/bonus balancing or the like.

Oh, and the current breakdown:
3 Players
16 per player
1 Neutral


4 Players
12 per player
1 Neutral


5 Players
9 per player
4 Neutral


6 Players
8 per player
1 Neutral
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby AndyDufresne on Tue May 01, 2007 6:21 pm

Well, I've been following the production of this map from when it first started out, and I must say I am pretty impressed, especially by the visuals.

I think going with the flags like a number of other people suggested was an interesting and unique way to go. I like it.

The color scheme is also very pleasing to the eye. The colors don't stand out too much and strain my eye...I like that!

And I think the lakes being playable will make this map very interesting, somewhat similar to Alexander the Great's Empire map, but as the lakes are a central figure, I think they will play much more of a strategic role for everyone than the seas in that map.

And I recall you mentioning a long while back ago in the post that eventually you'd fix up the names and align them, or at least I think I recall reading that :)

Hm, I'm jumping around, but the way the Title is currently, looks a little odd. It hink it may be the graphics...it feels a little out of place and pasted on almost like. The rest of the map blends nicely together, but I don't get that same meshing feel. The same may be true of the Mini-map also.

And the non-gameboard water also looks a little odd when comparing it to the lakes, but that may not be a bad thing, it just caught my eye.

Something to consider, perhaps making the 'hold' descriptions a little more noticeable. How? I am not sure, maybe the use of some colors could do that. Maybe a blue on the 'lake' words...I don't know. Just a small idea.

Hm and lastly, the compass also looks and feels a little odd to me. I'm not sure why, I can't quite put my finger on it...Ah oh well!

Keep up the good work!


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Postby The1exile on Tue May 01, 2007 6:27 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:And I think the lakes being playable will make this map very interesting, somewhat similar to Alexander the Great's Empire map, but as the lakes are a central figure, I think they will play much more of a strategic role for everyone than the seas in that map.


Just on a side note - I would disagree that the seas in Alex's empire aren't strategic - on the contrary, med and aegean seas are very hotly contested territories for control of Ptolemy and Kassander (unsurprisingly due to their significant reduction of borders).
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant The1exile
 
Posts: 7140
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 7:01 pm
Location: Devastation

PreviousNext

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users