Moderator: Community Team
pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
strike wolf wrote:This is something the moderators discussed and decided would segment the forum. I would be all for sticking games that are in sign ups to the upcoming games thread, if we could keep it updated.
pmchugh wrote:aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Rofl.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
safariguy5 wrote:aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Of course. Why everyone knows that plus signs are the universal symbol for "open for signups".
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Of course. Why everyone knows that plus signs are the universal symbol for "open for signups".
IKR? It's so much better than making easily-implemented tags for this forum to show the game is in sign-ups.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Of course. Why everyone knows that plus signs are the universal symbol for "open for signups".
IKR? It's so much better than making easily-implemented tags for this forum to show the game is in sign-ups.
safariguy5 wrote:shieldgenerator7 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:aage wrote:This actually sounds like a good idea. Or we could add "signups" to the title, but I guess that takes longer to read. Those plus signs are brilliant.pmchugh wrote:We should put tags on games that are in signups, like + signs or something.
Of course. Why everyone knows that plus signs are the universal symbol for "open for signups".
IKR? It's so much better than making easily-implemented tags for this forum to show the game is in sign-ups.
Indeed, because we know that EVERYONE who enters the mafia forum will read the handbook first. Just like EVERYONE who posts in GD reads the community guidelines first.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Is it really so hard to distinguish filled and non-filled games? Do we really think that adding ++ tags will raise the sign-up rates? ffs people, if your game isn't filling it's probably because there are too many games or nobody wants to join it.
I'm assuming y'all have eyes and basic comprehension abilities. Use them.
-Tails
vodean wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Is it really so hard to distinguish filled and non-filled games? Do we really think that adding ++ tags will raise the sign-up rates? ffs people, if your game isn't filling it's probably because there are too many games or nobody wants to join it.
I'm assuming y'all have eyes and basic comprehension abilities. Use them.
-Tails
funnily enough, yesterday i put ++ tags on my game, and today it is up from 2/9 to 4/9...
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:Nice! They do work afterall
(I like a good case of confirmatin bias)
-SG7 ( )
Yomiel wrote:It all blends together. When you see threads with stuff like "12/13", that would suggest one more player is needed.
Thank you for sharing this valuable information.Yomiel wrote:Nowhere else but here. Even forums with Queue sections usually just use that kind of thing for games in sign-ups.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users