thehippo8 wrote:@ Spiesr & Chap ... I did read "Hunter" but thought that was a flavour claim and not a role claim. Perhaps I was wrong there too! But my point remains that if he is really Snape then he is important, hence my unvote. But the more we chat and the less he responds, the bigger the hole he digs for himself!
Yes, hunter doesn't imply JOAT. Not sure exactly what it is, but it definitely isn't JOAT.
When we're talking about possible fakeclaims, I'd like to point out that mafia probably have a mix of prominent and less prominent characters for fakeclaims. While I know it borders on Meta, from a balance standpoint, it would make fakeclaims much less useful if every mafia fakeclaim was a secondary or peripheral character. So it stands to reason that some mafia members have important character fakes. So given the lack of clarity on the claim and the nature of the claim, I'm sticking with my vote.
I mean, think about it, how great a claim would it be as a fake? You have a perfect alibi for a possible guilty investigation on yourself, you can claim miller or hated townie or something and it fits the flavor perfectly.
