Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
ubcman64 wrote:as far as holding hostage is concerned, the game only went 6 rounds. in fact the whole game only lasted about a half an hour......i believe he will be cleared of that claim.
Jdsizzleslice wrote:ubcman64 wrote:as far as holding hostage is concerned, the game only went 6 rounds. in fact the whole game only lasted about a half an hour......i believe he will be cleared of that claim.
For 2 straight turns he left me alone until he could get all the bonuses he could. That, to me, is holding hostage.
ubcman64 wrote:Jdsizzleslice wrote:ubcman64 wrote:as far as holding hostage is concerned, the game only went 6 rounds. in fact the whole game only lasted about a half an hour......i believe he will be cleared of that claim.
For 2 straight turns he left me alone until he could get all the bonuses he could. That, to me, is holding hostage.
so you want this guy to be punished for the way he played 2 turns?.....not gonna happen
ubcman64 wrote:Jdsizzleslice wrote:ubcman64 wrote:as far as holding hostage is concerned, the game only went 6 rounds. in fact the whole game only lasted about a half an hour......i believe he will be cleared of that claim.
For 2 straight turns he left me alone until he could get all the bonuses he could. That, to me, is holding hostage.
so you want this guy to be punished for the way he played 2 turns?.....not gonna happen
sniffie wrote:prolonging the game with 2 rounds is not yet holding you hostage, especially when the game only lasted half an hour. I also think the the possibility that starx hacked the website is very small. In my opinion the is just thinking he's the man by saying things like that.
I'm pretty sure he won't get a warning for holding you hostage, I wonder what they are going to do about him calling you a "nigg"
sniffie
sundance123 wrote:This looks like sour grapes to me. You posted this after one round where he attacked a neutral instead of you. Look at the time stamps. Also you should have called him on both these things in game chat rather than running here far too quickly imo. As for the implication that he is trying to annoy you because you are a high ranked player well thats just hilarious.
There is one possible infraction here - the n word. All the rest is irrelevant.
That he did.sundance123 wrote: As for the implication that he is trying to annoy you because you are a high ranked player well that's just hilarious.
Jdsizzleslice wrote:Ok, I've look at you upper-ranked people and I have come to realize that the holding hostage is more than just 2 rounds. I didn't know that there was a round limit on it, and would be willing to drop it if someone would tell me what the specific round limit is for holding hostage.
sundance123 wrote:Jdsizzleslice wrote:Ok, I've look at you upper-ranked people and I have come to realize that the holding hostage is more than just 2 rounds. I didn't know that there was a round limit on it, and would be willing to drop it if someone would tell me what the specific round limit is for holding hostage.
I think the definition is when someone avoids ending the game intentionally to prevent a freemium from joining another game or force a deadbeat in a speed game. There are legitimate reasons for not ending a game when you can like when learning a map but a good rule of thumb is to rely on common sense. For example if the game has ended with no evidence that the offender was aware of your C&A report then you are probably overreacting.
*edit - it was starx's first time on the luxembourg map
Users browsing this forum: No registered users