WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

by **AndyDufresne** on Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:31 pm

What do you call a cow with a twitch?

Beef Jerky. (Just wanted to lighten the mood with an old crappy joke

)

But seriously, lets keep the posts in this topic to the map. If you'd like to talk about the cartographer, take it to the Social Louge or the Flame Wars...depending on what you'd like to say. I agree with Ruben that most of the posts here aren't needed in the Foundry. So thanks!

--Andy

by **Molacole** on Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:58 pm

I agree with both andy and qeee1!

we need this map back up and we ALL (myself included) need to keep ALL of our posts specifically related to the map.

So whenever qwert is ready to post a picture of the map and start discussing the map then so am I. Let's give it another try qwert! I think we will have better results this time.

by **boberz** on Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:10 am

lol i think were going round in circles but i would love to see it done so yeah bring back the map...

by **Qwert** on Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:46 am

Soory Boberz but when i see what you doing now with Netherlands map(Finding Microscopic mistake) then i dont want to draging people more, Please go in others topic and give support to others map makers, because now is lone maps Netherland is in danger to be abandoned.

by **boberz** on Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:08 pm

i think it is good that i occasionally find and usually support improvements however trivial so no i will not stop as tyhis is what the foundry is for.

By the wayi thought you had decided not to post in the foundry any more.

Also why bring the Netherlands map up that has no relevance to this map, i would like to see both completed but not so they are substandard.

by **qeee1** on Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:34 pm

boberz wrote:i think it is good that i occasionally find and usually support improvements however trivial so no i will not stop as tyhis is what the foundry is for.

By the wayi thought you had decided not to post in the foundry any more.

Also why bring the Netherlands map up that has no relevance to this map, i would like to see both completed but not so they are substandard.

Blah, you should be glad this is the map foundry, or I'd be really mean and stuff.

Please put the map back up qwert?

by **Qwert** on Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:26 pm

Geee 1 like i say, we can discuse for bonuses and sea names, but for others is finish, and when i see Netherland Map and in what way some people searching for mistake(10 time Magnifying map) I realy dont want to go in these bad time, and i still dont have reply from Andy. I have patient and i will waith. Please gee 1, go in netherland map topic and give support Lone, i realy dont want to se another map author to abandoned map because these Microscopic demand.

by **Ruben Cassar** on Mon Apr 16, 2007 3:01 pm

qwert wrote:Geee 1 like i say, we can discuse for bonuses and sea names, but for others is finish, and when i see Netherland Map and in what way some people searching for mistake(10 time Magnifying map) I realy dont want to go in these bad time, and i still dont have reply from Andy. I have patient and i will waith. Please gee 1, go in netherland map topic and give support Lone, i realy dont want to se another map author to abandoned map because these Microscopic demand.

How can we discuss the bonuses if you do not put the map back up? Unless you decide to put it up this whole thread is useless. So just put the map up qwert so that we can discuss the bonuses.

As far as I remember Andy replied saying that we need the map back on to be able to continue discussing it.

by **boberz** on Tue Apr 17, 2007 4:53 am

qwert what is wrong with magnifying the map if it shows where improvements can be made. People usuaaly find improvements in real size and then magnify them so that it can be clearly seen just like for the boundries on this map

by **hulmey** on Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:16 am

I disagree with magnifying the map to see errors in the map that you cant see with the naked eye.

But if you can see it with the naked eye it shouldnt be a problem!

by **Guiscard** on Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:26 am

hulmey wrote:I disagree with magnifying the map to see errors in the map that you cant see with the naked eye.

But if you can see it with the naked eye it shouldnt be a problem!

Everything that has been magnified has obviously been spotted with the naked eye, Hulmey. No-one is going around actually magnifying the maps to FIND errors. We see errors, and use magnification to point out what we've seen to people for whom it is not immediately obvious. I still maintain that if a change isn't gonna upset anyone it should be made anyway. No-one was annoyed that he blurred them, but people would have been if he hadn't.

by **boberz** on Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:41 pm

thanx guiscard exactly what i was trying to say

by **Hitmanblood** on Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:58 pm

This map should be finished already where is delay it is just nonsence. And it looks great better then most of the maps on CC even several months ago.

by **hulmey** on Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:02 pm

yeah but what can u do mate!!

by **Geographical** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:15 am

hulmey wrote:yeah but what can u do mate!!

Nothing right now unless qwert changes his mind. probably would take ages.

by **boberz** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:22 am

i agree. has anyone worked out the page where the latest map is perhaps we could find more suggestions from that so there are not so many if and when qwert comes back to it

by **DiM** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:25 am

boberz wrote:i agree. has anyone worked out the page where the latest map is perhaps we could find more suggestions from that so there are not so many if and when qwert comes back to it

all the images have been removed by qwert. i think there's no point in spamming this thread.
if he decides he wants to continue his work qwert will do it.

by **boberz** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:30 am

really; i didnt realise he had removed them is that childishness or is there a valid reason. This might mean an all time low for qwert, i thought perhaps we could do some proactive work and find more imporvments

by **DiM** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:36 am

he is upset and feels that certain people have something against him and his map. it's his decision and we should respect him. let this thread rest and probably when things cool down qwert will try again.

by **boberz** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 5:40 am

im so angry and if i liked swearing would make a flame but perhaps ill do what you say and let it rest untill there is a map back

by **hulmey** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 6:25 am

What u angry about Boberz?

by **boberz** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:25 am

have a guess it begins with q and ends in t

by **Gilligan** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:41 am

haha qwert

by **boberz** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 9:46 am

now let us build a concise index of things most of us believe have not been defended adequately so they are ready if ever qwert comes back:

sea names

to be honest it is so long ago i dont remember the rest

by **Ruben Cassar** on Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:04 am

DiM wrote:he is upset and feels that certain people have something against him and his map. it's his decision and we should respect him. let this thread rest and probably when things cool down qwert will try again.

Yeah but will he be back? Haven't seen him online for a while. I can't believe he is not going to finish this map. It make me angry...come on qwert put the damn images online and finish it!

WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

Who is online