Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Ghost20021 wrote:Accused:
simmons4
davsweeney
tec805
The accused are suspected of: Abusive Gaming
Other: One player is a colonel, the other two are brigadiers. One player reserved the spots for the other two. They are playing against a Sargent, a Sargent First Class, and a Cadet
Game number(s): Game 10531352 [Primary]
10509280
10495402
10474987
10329990
Comments: We are playing a Triples match which means teaming and being with your friends is legit, but they chose a game where they grossly over experience their opponents, then time it so they start the game on there terms and get the first moves (freestyle game, which is actually not a bad strategy). In their opening attack, they all target one player (the highest ranked one at that). These things aren't necessarily illegal, just unfair. The point is, they chose a game in which they know they will crush their opponents. I'll be surprised if this game goes 5 rounds. They, thus far, have shown excellent coordination that cannot possibly hope to be matched by a thrown together ragtag group. It seems like at least two out of the three are always in the same games as each other (granted team games). And I will admit that overall, they do play opponents with equal or high caliber more than they play lower caliber players (the games listed being the exception) but the Primary game was a blatant act of setting up weaker opponents for slaughter. It's not like they set up the game and a couple of weaklings unknowing joined them. I started the game, my teammates joined on my side, and then one of them joined and reserved the spots for the other two. What's the fun in playing if you don't even have a chance from that start and get annihilated by some dream team? If this isn't against the rules, I apologize but would like to make a note that it really should be.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
cookie0117 wrote:Its only 1 game, if they joined all your games it might be considered differently. If your going to play that map and settings again you could either ask them not to join or make a private game and put a call out for a team of similar experience by clicking and posting here. Then give the password to the team you want to play. I would not foe them as you may want to play them later in your career, save foeing for the real idiots who you will bump into as you go along
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
Ghost20021 wrote:Accused:
simmons4
davsweeney
tec805
The accused are suspected of: Abusive Gaming
Other: One player is a colonel, the other two are brigadiers. One player reserved the spots for the other two. They are playing against a Sargent, a Sargent First Class, and a Cadet
Game number(s): Game 10531352[Primary]
Game 10509280
Game 10495402
Game 10474987
Game 10329990
Comments: We are playing a Triples match which means teaming and being with your friends is legit, but they chose a game where they grossly over experience their opponents, then time it so they start the game on there terms and get the first moves (freestyle game, which is actually not a bad strategy). In their opening attack, they all target one player (the highest ranked one at that). These things aren't necessarily illegal, just unfair. The point is, they chose a game in which they know they will crush their opponents. I'll be surprised if this game goes 5 rounds. They, thus far, have shown excellent coordination that cannot possibly hope to be matched by a thrown together ragtag group. It seems like at least two out of the three are always in the same games as each other (granted team games). And I will admit that overall, they do play opponents with equal or high caliber more than they play lower caliber players (the games listed being the exception) but the Primary game was a blatant act of setting up weaker opponents for slaughter. It's not like they set up the game and a couple of weaklings unknowing joined them. I started the game, my teammates joined on my side, and then one of them joined and reserved the spots for the other two. What's the fun in playing if you don't even have a chance from that start and get annihilated by some dream team? If this isn't against the rules, I apologize but would like to make a note that it really should be.
jefjef wrote:You just got farmed.
There is no rule violation unless they are account sharing... (One of them playing more than 1 account).
cookie0117 wrote:If your going to play that map and settings again you could either ask them not to join or make a private game and put a call out for a team of similar experience by clicking and posting here. Then give the password to the team you want to play.
alstergren wrote:cookie0117 wrote:Its only 1 game, if they joined all your games it might be considered differently. If your going to play that map and settings again you could either ask them not to join or make a private game and put a call out for a team of similar experience by clicking and posting here. Then give the password to the team you want to play. I would not foe them as you may want to play them later in your career, save foeing for the real idiots who you will bump into as you go along
No, it wouldn't have. (That wouldn't make sense and besides, there's a foe option available.)
Ghost20021 wrote:Accused:
simmons4
davsweeney
tec805
The accused are suspected of: being a dream team
jltile1 wrote:Joke well if they lose it's a lot of points have lost to plenty of hats 50 points a game that it what you all should be talking about. People lose ranks just to beat bigger players do play the game if you can't get in a fight rank does not mean a whole lot here. There is a bright individual under every dice roll..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users