Moderator: Cartographers
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Victor Sullivan wrote:Aloha! Er, avast! Or something...
I still say I'm less than impressed with the title, though that's merely the entirety of a minority, it seems. At any rate, not all of your shields on the large version are centered on the horizontal axis (I realize why they aren't on the vertical), particularly the yellow ones.
I'm most interested to see what nobodies has to say. I'm rather surprised gimil didn't have anything more to say.
-Sully
gimil wrote:You may...
Welcome to the forge... remember this is no a seal of final approval. If further concerns arise you will have to address them
koontz1973 wrote:The 88s on the large are centred but the 88s on the small are 2 or 3 pixels to the left to the 888s fit into the territ completely.
natty_dread wrote:koontz1973 wrote:The 88s on the large are centred but the 88s on the small are 2 or 3 pixels to the left to the 888s fit into the territ completely.
You could rather just center the 88:s on both versions - it doesn't matter if the 888:s go over the squares on the small, as long as they don't overlap each other.
natty_dread wrote:Koontz, can you please post a version with neutral amounts and starting troop amounts for the xml check. Thanks.
natty_dread wrote:Here you go, por favor!
Gillipig wrote:Sorry to say this but I think this might be the most luck dependent map I've ever seen! If you get to start and roll good you'll win. Not much strategy to this map! I'll still play it though !
thenobodies80 wrote:About knights, please post in the knights topic
Nobodies
Users browsing this forum: No registered users