Moderator: Cartographers
DiM wrote:bring back the little soldiers
DiM wrote:good. but place them like you used to. one army in the top half and another in the bottom half. just like the troops on the board will be placed.
and don't forget to add depth and shadowing to the walls to really make them higher than the grass.
koontz1973 wrote:DiM wrote:good. but place them like you used to. one army in the top half and another in the bottom half. just like the troops on the board will be placed.
and don't forget to add depth and shadowing to the walls to really make them higher than the grass.
So you would rather see the red at the top and green at the bottom?
I took the shadow of the wall as it became the border only. But if you want it back, back it can go.
Will get them done first thing. Thanks DiM.
Anything else as I will do it in the morning now?
DiM wrote:bring back the little knights
DiM wrote:koontz1973 wrote:DiM wrote:good. but place them like you used to. one army in the top half and another in the bottom half. just like the troops on the board will be placed.
and don't forget to add depth and shadowing to the walls to really make them higher than the grass.
So you would rather see the red at the top and green at the bottom?
I took the shadow of the wall as it became the border only. But if you want it back, back it can go.
Will get them done first thing. Thanks DiM.
Anything else as I will do it in the morning now?
it's not just about the shadow of the wall. it also has to have volume and depth.
the grass is the lowest point. then the walkway on the walls is at a higher point and then the little ramparts (i think) are the highest point.
so the ramparts drop a shadow on the walkway and the whole wall drops a shadow on the grass.
you have the layered file so you could do this better. i just did the ramparts in bulk as i did not have time to do it individually.
your image which looks flat ..................................... my image with more bevel and depth.
.....
koontz1973 wrote:When looking at the image, I asked myself, why would a garden have stone pillars around the inside of the path.
natty_dread wrote:koontz1973 wrote:When looking at the image, I asked myself, why would a garden have stone pillars around the inside of the path.
Why would a garden have a giant chessboard?
koontz1973 wrote:Thanks zimmah, had not missed it. Been discussed.
koontz1973 wrote:natty_dread wrote:koontz1973 wrote:When looking at the image, I asked myself, why would a garden have stone pillars around the inside of the path.
Why would a garden have a giant chessboard?
To play chess in off course.
Victor Sullivan wrote:koontz1973 wrote:Thanks zimmah, had not missed it. Been discussed.
You want to go with your flatter version?
-Sully
natty_dread wrote:koontz1973 wrote:natty_dread wrote:koontz1973 wrote:When looking at the image, I asked myself, why would a garden have stone pillars around the inside of the path.
Why would a garden have a giant chessboard?
To play chess in off course.
Right, maybe I'm not making my point very clear...
Why would a garden have a stone wall with a bunch of knights hanging out on it? What gardens do have is flowers or vegetables and old ladies in flowery dresses tending on them... To me, what you have is more like a castle yard, and it would make perfect sense to have ramparts on the wall. Maybe it doesn't make that much sense to have the ramparts on the inside, but I think it's an acceptable break from reality if it looks better that way.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users