Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
mc05025 wrote:I can not see the difference between CoF and yourself. The debate was between you and him and you used trolling/flaming too. I do not think that because the thread was about you you should have special rights. In addition, opening a C&A report for that does not seems reasonable.
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Also, I recommend that CC begin LIMITING the replies to threads allowed: like 3 per person, or no more than 10% of total. or like other places (profile), limit the CHARACTERS allowed on a thread. Jeez, learn to edit your prior comments.
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:To those of you who were positive, Happy New Year. For those of you who declined (busy or dislike), thank you for your self control. For Naysayers, fine. for REPEATING DRONING naysayers, get your jammies on. It's time for your momma to read you a beddy bye story. I hope it's your favorite one: with GLG as the boogey man.
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:*************************** PM reply sent to MC: *******************************************************
Other:
-again, I have a LOT of respect for YOUR accomplishments. I read some of your game logs and admire your process. I've told several people: if MC wanted 6,000-10,000 points, I think he could do it
-even though I hear a LOT of people say they didn't like YOUR system, I backed you 100%. hey, your business
-I didn't break any rules to get my score. However because he disagrees with the rules, he can begin trolling/flaming?
-you are most recent conquerer (rabitton came back for 1 game). Why does CoF have such a problem with what I do and is so vocal about it -- but not you. . .or Rodion, or other top 10-20-30?
-at least when I defend myself (you call it same) I'm funny -- and not Nasty. I haven't gotten nasty with him yet.
-one of the repliers said "we can 1) agree, 2) disagree, 3) act lilke a dick. ~CoF is being #3"
-CC claims to want a Friendly campfire-like atmosphere, CoF is doing the opposite of that.
*****************************************************************************************
Master Bush wrote:Btw, a lot of those posts by cof in that thread are reply posts. I guess he should just ignore them, because he already posted posted 2 or 3 times in that threads lol.
It's funny that the idea of limiting one's post count in a thread was never suggested or complained about, until those posts were anti-GLG and his joke of a playing style. I guess it's a case of minimizing things, which GLG is good at.
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Summary of Agree/disagree, Trolls (thru 11 posts -- disregards multiple replies):
4 Agree:
2 Disagree:
2 Trolls/off topic: (Master Bush, GoranZ)
Amazingly DETRACTORS agree that it's trolling/flaming/baiting
s3xt0y wrote:Master Bush wrote:Btw, a lot of those posts by cof in that thread are reply posts. I guess he should just ignore them, because he already posted posted 2 or 3 times in that threads lol.
It's funny that the idea of limiting one's post count in a thread was never suggested or complained about, until those posts were anti-GLG and his joke of a playing style. I guess it's a case of minimizing things, which GLG is good at.
Master Bush, this thread is all about trolling/flaming/baiting, and everything you wrote above was a flame/bait. If your so keen on cleaning up this site as I have seen you post so many times (well "clean" is a term i'm using), in so many different ways you have to start with yourself.
Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Summary of Agree/disagree, Trolls (thru 11 posts -- disregards multiple replies):
4 Agree:
2 Disagree:
2 Trolls/off topic: (Master Bush, GoranZ)
Master Bush wrote:Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:Summary of Agree/disagree, Trolls (thru 11 posts -- disregards multiple replies):
4 Agree:
2 Disagree:
2 Trolls/off topic: (Master Bush, GoranZ)
LOL HOLY CRAP THIS IS AMAZING!!
I disagree and GoranZ disagrees, so that makes 4 disagrees. And you seem to either be counting yourself, or counting s3xt0y twice, because I only count 3 agrees, and one wasnt really that strong of an endorsement.
king achilles wrote:I told you to report all forum posts that you see as forum violations and then to put him on foe. If you have already done that, then you have already done your part.
Master Bush wrote:s3xt0y wrote:Master Bush wrote:Btw, a lot of those posts by cof in that thread are reply posts. I guess he should just ignore them, because he already posted posted 2 or 3 times in that threads lol.
It's funny that the idea of limiting one's post count in a thread was never suggested or complained about, until those posts were anti-GLG and his joke of a playing style. I guess it's a case of minimizing things, which GLG is good at.
Master Bush, this thread is all about trolling/flaming/baiting, and everything you wrote above was a flame/bait. If your so keen on cleaning up this site as I have seen you post so many times (well "clean" is a term i'm using), in so many different ways you have to start with yourself.
Really, because to me, it looks like a reply to GLG's suggestion of 3 posts limit in a thread.
GoranZ wrote:Hahahahahahaha... Gen.LeeGettinhed you really think that you accomplished something? What would that be? Reward for being cook serial killer, nothing more lolGen.LeeGettinhed wrote:*************************** PM reply sent to MC: *******************************************************
Other:
-again, I have a LOT of respect for YOUR accomplishments. I read some of your game logs and admire your process. I've told several people: if MC wanted 6,000-10,000 points, I think he could do it
-even though I hear a LOT of people say they didn't like YOUR system, I backed you 100%. hey, your business
-I didn't break any rules to get my score. However because he disagrees with the rules, he can begin trolling/flaming?
-you are most recent conquerer (rabitton came back for 1 game). Why does CoF have such a problem with what I do and is so vocal about it -- but not you. . .or Rodion, or other top 10-20-30?
-at least when I defend myself (you call it same) I'm funny -- and not Nasty. I haven't gotten nasty with him yet.
-one of the repliers said "we can 1) agree, 2) disagree, 3) act lilke a dick. ~CoF is being #3"
-CC claims to want a Friendly campfire-like atmosphere, CoF is doing the opposite of that.
*****************************************************************************************
Although I don't like mc because of RL issue I can guarantee that MC IS OPPOSITE OF YOU, and you can only dream to be like him.
Gen.LeeGettinhed have you asked your self how does it look to fight agents 2K+ player?
NoSurvivors wrote:First:
I've seen GLG play. He has probably one of the best strategies on this site. When I played with him in doubles, I learned a lot of things. He has very balanced play, and is a great leader. If you guys think his way of winning is so easy, go ahead ad do it. Prove to CC that ANYONE can do it. Because I can garuntee that not a one of the people (who, in fact are flaming GLG, look at all of the negative posts in a CONGRATS thread for Pete's sake) will be able to do what he has done. Instead, they will now most likely continue to hide behind their keyboards and pretend that they are all better than him, which I garuntee most of you are not.
On topic:
CoF, I have nothing against you or GLG. But posting all the negative comments in a thread made by GLG's friend to congratulate him? That strikes me as flaming. GLG, I and all the rest of CC apologuise for the behavior of the jealous members of CC. Although they go on about how the "integrity of the site" is at risk, they still continue to flame you. I hope justice will be served in your favour.
-NoS
Master Bush wrote:NoSurvivors wrote:First:
I've seen GLG play. He has probably one of the best strategies on this site. When I played with him in doubles, I learned a lot of things. He has very balanced play, and is a great leader. If you guys think his way of winning is so easy, go ahead ad do it. Prove to CC that ANYONE can do it. Because I can garuntee that not a one of the people (who, in fact are flaming GLG, look at all of the negative posts in a CONGRATS thread for Pete's sake) will be able to do what he has done. Instead, they will now most likely continue to hide behind their keyboards and pretend that they are all better than him, which I garuntee most of you are not.
On topic:
CoF, I have nothing against you or GLG. But posting all the negative comments in a thread made by GLG's friend to congratulate him? That strikes me as flaming. GLG, I and all the rest of CC apologuise for the behavior of the jealous members of CC. Although they go on about how the "integrity of the site" is at risk, they still continue to flame you. I hope justice will be served in your favour.
-NoS
another post from a bias GLG friend and oft team mate.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users