natty_dread wrote:iancanton wrote:near east will benefit from reunified turkey and iran regions. middle east is probably the least attractive bonus on the board because of the number of potential hostile neighbours, so reducing the number of regions makes sense.
Not all the areas on the map need to be attractive though. There can be some hard bonuses, I think. Besides the changes you suggest don't reduce the borders of the area, and wouldn't make it any easier to defend.
However: I could add mountains between Caucasus & Volgograd and add a 1-way assault from Caucasus to Volgograd... effectively reducing the borders of Middle East by 1, and making it a bit easier to hold. How's that sound?
That sounds ok, but I think I will take this moment to reprise my suggestion of splitting the Middle Eastern bonus into an east and west bonus. Iran and Iraq in the East and all the other regions making a sort of... well I guess you could call the bonus Asia minor. I agree with Ian that as it is a completely undesirable region. I would never consider staging my game from what corner. It seems kind of a waste. I think my suggestion A.) makes perfect sense as far as a logical division of the region and, B.) would serve to make the region a practical area to base your strategy around.
I urge you to consider this once more. I do hate when people repeat suggestions, so If you decide that this isn't a direction you want to go I promise I will say no more of it. The one way mountain assault is an ok Idea, however if Istanbul is plugged that's a LONG way to go around if you need to get into the mid east from Europe.