Porn in Gen.LeeGettinhed's sig[noted]es

by **EagleofGreenErth** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:31 pm

Accused:

Gen.LeeGettinhed

The accused are suspected of:

Porn in his signature
Giving the false impression that crap like that is tolerated here, seeing how its coming from the CONQUEROR

Comments:

Report was filed earlier and you cleared him because the nipples were covered... that is no longer the case now... I have a screenshot I can share if needed.

by **codierose** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:34 pm

dont bother m8 they love him

by **EagleofGreenErth** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:36 pm

Any images of pornographic activity or nudity - nipples, areola, genitals, anuses etc - whether intended as artistic, erotic, pornographic or otherwise are not allowed.

by **blakebowling** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:40 pm

EagleofGreenErth wrote:
Any images of pornographic activity or nudity - nipples, areola, genitals, anuses etc - whether intended as artistic, erotic, pornographic or otherwise are not allowed.

Those aren't pornographic.

by **EagleofGreenErth** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:44 pm

blakebowling wrote:
EagleofGreenErth wrote:
Any images of pornographic activity or nudity - nipples, areola, genitals, anuses etc - whether intended as artistic, erotic, pornographic or otherwise are not allowed.

Those aren't pornographic.

A woman flashing her NIPPLES clearly.... hmm, well that breaks the rule on NUDITY then... wtf are you smoking?

by **codierose** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:45 pm

hes changed them again

post the screen shot

by **EagleofGreenErth** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 6:51 pm

Now tell me again thats not breaking a rule? HMM?

*Screenshot removed*

by **s3xt0y** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:20 pm

eww thats nasty, saggy grossness...ban stick...conquerer for a day lol then banned

by **blakebowling** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:29 pm

EagleofGreenErth wrote:Now tell me again thats not breaking a rule? HMM?

Screenshot Removed

That wasn't the signature that he had up when I saw it, please don't be rude.

by **EagleofGreenErth** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:32 pm

Hes had that up since I posted the thread... seriously...

by **s3xt0y** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:32 pm

doesn't matter if it was the one that was up when you saw it...lol it was up...go check the logs

by **niMic** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:36 pm

by **blakebowling** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:38 pm

Changing signatures aren't logged.

Also as stated before, screen shots are easily faked.

by **jackal31** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:40 pm

show: Adult Content Warning

blakebowling,

what is rude....or obnoxious....is the fact your ignoring it. Similarly to all the "farming" he has done too. The leadership of this site is really pissing me off anymore. Kids play here, yet pornographic material, bullying, and many other intolerable things go on here and seem to be accepted. Many have spoken up about these issues, yet nothing seems to happen.

No wonder why many people are leaving.

by **eddie2** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:43 pm

every time i look the pic has spots on but if this image is true then ban (i nearly got banned for posting a image of as nipple on a foot.) i also cannt see how oi fake so good.

by **EagleofGreenErth** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:44 pm

Yes, its easy to fake stuff.

However, my screenshot has the same image you cleared earlier without the censored bits...

I am not an expert nipple drawing artist... :lol:

And it is currently still uncensored in his sig...

by **blakebowling** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:48 pm

jackal31 wrote:blakebowling,

what is rude....or obnoxious....is the fact your ignoring it. Similarly to all the "farming" he has done too. The leadership of this site is really pissing me off anymore. Kids play here, yet pornographic material, bullying, and many other intolerable things go on here and seem to be accepted. Many have spoken up about these issues, yet nothing seems to happen.

No wonder why many people are leaving.

His statement to me insulted my intelligence. I know what is against the rules, and my post stated that in the state of his current signature he wasn't breaking the rules.

I honestly don't have the power to do anything about this and he knows that. Most people that wish to cause trouble on this site know that most likely nothing will be done to enforce the rules, I myself am also tired of it. I've been trying to take care of this on private channels but to no avail either, I am simply ignored.

To anyone saying his signature is currently showing nudity, I've looked at it several times in the past few minutes, including when I'm writing this post now, and it isn't showing as you've posted in the screenshot.

by **EagleofGreenErth** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:51 pm

I dont understand this at all then because I STILL SEE IT AS MY SCREENSHOT SHOWS IT. And that REALLY confuses me.

by **Arcee** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:55 pm

EagleofGreenErth wrote:I dont understand this at all then because I STILL SEE IT AS MY SCREENSHOT SHOWS IT. And that REALLY confuses me.

Try clearing your cache.

by **blakebowling** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:56 pm

It's possible you have a cached version, I just cleared my cache and checked again so that may resolve it. Otherwise something weird is going on.

by **EagleofGreenErth** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:57 pm

Ah... now I see a woman much farther away...

by **blakebowling** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:21 pm

EagleofGreenErth wrote:Ah... now I see a woman much farther away...

That's what we see as well. I'm sure they'll still take a look at this, but I doubt anything will be done.

by **drunkmonkey** on Thu Dec 29, 2011 10:07 pm

How many people never saw it until EagleOfGreenErth plastered a since-removed pornographic image all over the thread? That really wasn't necessary, and the screenshot should have been submitted in an e-ticket or privately to a mod.