Moderator: Community Team
zimmah wrote:i'd like to point out that i don't think epi is acting scummy, but i have no clue as who to vote for atm.
dazza2008 wrote:I wasn't blocked last night as I have no night action. I am Token Black Vanilla Townie. I think I will still be lynched as its a weak claim but I am what I am so not alot else I can do? I don't know why there was no kill. All I can guess is some sort of bus driver or something switched me with the killer, so MoB thinks he blocked me but actually blocked someone else.
dazza2008 wrote:I wasn't blocked last night as I have no night action. I am Token Black Vanilla Townie. I think I will still be lynched as its a weak claim but I am what I am so not alot else I can do? I don't know why there was no kill. All I can guess is some sort of bus driver or something switched me with the killer, so MoB thinks he blocked me but actually blocked someone else.
One minor interesting point regarding the scene is that the target is being described as smaller/younger than the assailant. So, if that part is true rather than just fluff, there seem to be two possibilities: 1. Dazza's character claim is a lie or he wasn't the attacker. 2. The target was a even younger character/ (Ike?)blakebowling wrote:A younger citizen of this town was being chased by an unknown assailant, they ran through the town until the smaller one had no place to run. As he backed up against the wall, he saw a gun point towards his face. Surprisingly, all he heard was a single click. When he looked up, his attacker had vanished into the night.
dazza2008 wrote:I wasn't blocked last night as I have no night action. I am Token Black Vanilla Townie. I think I will still be lynched as its a weak claim but I am what I am so not alot else I can do? I don't know why there was no kill. All I can guess is some sort of bus driver or something switched me with the killer, so MoB thinks he blocked me but actually blocked someone else.
MoB Deadly wrote:dazza2008 wrote:I wasn't blocked last night as I have no night action. I am Token Black Vanilla Townie. I think I will still be lynched as its a weak claim but I am what I am so not alot else I can do? I don't know why there was no kill. All I can guess is some sort of bus driver or something switched me with the killer, so MoB thinks he blocked me but actually blocked someone else.
Thats a classic defense. Since he claimed Vanilla Townie I am certain that lynching him would definitely be worth the information we would gain. I think Dazza is the Devil. He would be significantly taller.
zimmah wrote:vote dazza. if he turns out to be VT, MOB should be lynched.
zimmah wrote:vote dazza. if he turns out to be VT, MOB should be lynched.
I have to agree with DrunkMonkey here and question this decision. If Dazza turns out to actually be town that doesn't necessarily mean that MobDeadly was scum making it all up in order to get a townie lynched. He could very well simply have been mistaken about the connection between Dazza being blocked and the lack of a night kill. That option certainly seems to be a more likely scenario than him coming out with a fake town role-blocker claim in order to get one random townie lynched. I mean, it seem like that would have been a pretty risky move for scum to make, what with the possibility of there being an actual town role-blocker that would simply counter the claim and shut down the operation right at the start. Maybe if we were at LYLO or something could I see a gambit like that possibly being worth the risk. With 12 players alive, in a game where I couldn't see more than 4 scum, I am fairly confident we are not a LYLO now.zimmah wrote:vote dazza. if he turns out to be VT, MOB should be lynched.
At that point there is nothing unusual about his vote. The first vote count after that, on November 14, records his vote normally.drunkmonkey wrote:No one seems to be coming forward with anything helpful from the night, and I think this case has some merit.
vote slowreactor
He makes no changes to his vote and it remains on Slowreactor not showing anything unusual for several vote counts, that last of which being on November 21.blakebowling wrote:Vote Count
slowreactor (3) - spiesr, drunkmonkey, MoB Deadly
drunkmonkey (1) - usAir
With 12 alive, 7 Votes are required to lynch.
Then, on November 23, Blake posts the following vote count:blakebowling wrote:Vote Count
slowreactor (5) - spiesr, drunkmonkey, LSU, Epitaph1, dazza2008 (L-2)
drunkmonkey (1) - usAir
sensfan (3) - zimmah, MoB Deadly, drake_259
Here the vote has been moved to Sensfan and is now colored red. Drunkmonkey expresses surprise at this turn of events and tries to change his vote, but he appears unable at to effect it.blakebowling wrote:Vote Count
slowreactor (3) - spiesr, LSU, dazza2008
drunkmonkey (1) - usAir
sensfan (4) - zimmah, MoB Deadly, drake_259, drunkmonkey (L-3)
LSU (1) - Epitaph1
With 12 alive, 7 Votes are required to lynch.
ATTENTION:Deadline has been extended to November 26th (Due to Thanksgiving, I overlooked that when setting the original deadline), it won't be enforced until sometime late-night though.
If no option has 7 votes (A player's lynch or a No-Lynch), then the option with the most votes will happen. If there is a tie it will be broken by Random.org.
spiesr wrote:I have to agree with DrunkMonkey here and question this decision. If Dazza turns out to actually be town that doesn't necessarily mean that MobDeadly was scum making it all up in order to get a townie lynched. He could very well simply have been mistaken about the connection between Dazza being blocked and the lack of a night kill. That option certainly seems to be a more likely scenario than him coming out with a fake town role-blocker claim in order to get one random townie lynched. I mean, it seem like that would have been a pretty risky move for scum to make, what with the possibility of there being an actual town role-blocker that would simply counter the claim and shut down the operation right at the start. Maybe if we were at LYLO or something could I see a gambit like that possibly being worth the risk. With 12 players alive, in a game where I couldn't see more than 4 scum, I am fairly confident we are not a LYLO now.zimmah wrote:vote dazza. if he turns out to be VT, MOB should be lynched.
Something else we could discuss a bit while we are waiting to see if a busdriver or something happens. Has there been any indication if anyone had their vote stolen today? Upon reading back over day 2 I just noticed something strange about the "stolen" vote. On November 13, DrunkMonkey votes for Slowreactor.At that point there is nothing unusual about his vote. The first vote count after that, on November 14, records his vote normally.drunkmonkey wrote:No one seems to be coming forward with anything helpful from the night, and I think this case has some merit.
vote slowreactorHe makes no changes to his vote and it remains on Slowreactor not showing anything unusual for several vote counts, that last of which being on November 21.blakebowling wrote:Vote Count
slowreactor (3) - spiesr, drunkmonkey, MoB Deadly
drunkmonkey (1) - usAir
With 12 alive, 7 Votes are required to lynch.Then, on November 23, Blake posts the following vote count:blakebowling wrote:Vote Count
slowreactor (5) - spiesr, drunkmonkey, LSU, Epitaph1, dazza2008 (L-2)
drunkmonkey (1) - usAir
sensfan (3) - zimmah, MoB Deadly, drake_259Here the vote has been moved to Sensfan and is now colored red. Drunkmonkey expresses surprise at this turn of events and tries to change his vote, but he appears unable at to effect it.blakebowling wrote:Vote Count
slowreactor (3) - spiesr, LSU, dazza2008
drunkmonkey (1) - usAir
sensfan (4) - zimmah, MoB Deadly, drake_259, drunkmonkey (L-3)
LSU (1) - Epitaph1
With 12 alive, 7 Votes are required to lynch.
ATTENTION:Deadline has been extended to November 26th (Due to Thanksgiving, I overlooked that when setting the original deadline), it won't be enforced until sometime late-night though.
If no option has 7 votes (A player's lynch or a No-Lynch), then the option with the most votes will happen. If there is a tie it will be broken by Random.org.
The part of this that interests me is that DrunkMonkey appeared to be in control of his vote at the begging of day 2 and then lost control later in the day. In my experience, when a role like politician steals a vote it is for the entire day. The affected player will receive a message at the beginning of the day phase from the mod letting them know that they are unable to vote that day, or sometime not depending on the mod, and then that player will not be able to make any votes for that day. Here things seem to have worked differently. Either the vote was stolen by a day action, or the player that stole the vote was able to take control of it in during the day and before that the player whose vote was stolen would have no indication what had happened. (I suppose there is the very low chance the the vote was supposed to be out of Drunk's control the entire day and Blake simply forgot about it until the thief actually used it.)
For reference, the players who posted between the last vote count where Drunk controlled his vote and when it changed are zimmah, sensfan, drunkmonkey, skillfusniper33, slowreactor, dazza2008, Epitaph1, LSU Tiger Josh, spiesr, and usAir. Basically, everyone expect MobDeadly and Drake. (Also safariguy, who was dead at the time.)
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:I want to hear Mob's answer to the earlier question before doing my vote as well.
zimmah wrote:vote dazza. if he turns out to be VT, MOB should be lynched.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users