boomer316, pinner_33, kazoo69 SD [WARNED] KRK

by **Andwyn** on Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:28 am

Accused: boomer316, pinner_33, kazoo69

The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number:
Game 9993576

Comments: Blue made a comment at the beginning of the game, singling me out and saying I "Joined their game". I then found myself consistently the target from every player of this game until I was out of it.

by **trinicardinal** on Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:39 am

Andwyn wrote:Accused:boomer316, pinner_33, kazoo69

The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number:
Game 9993576

Comments: Blue made a comment at the beginning of the game, singling me out and saying I "Joined their game". I then found myself consistently the target from every player of this game until I was out of it.

Added links

by **jgordon1111** on Wed Nov 09, 2011 12:20 am

yea this one is bad if they are wanting to play a private game then they need to set it up as one,but if they are playing as friends and do a united attack on someone like that then they need to be banned from playing with each other except in private games.And reviewing their games alot of them are together and the way they talk they are friends,and refer to the game that andy joined in another one,that the dumbass took his turn go take yours and finish him.nothing fair about what they did or how.rules violation secret diplomacy from the other game even.

by **Andwyn** on Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:41 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:yea this one is bad if they are wanting to play a private game then they need to set it up as one,but if they are playing as friends and do a united attack on someone like that then they need to be banned from playing with each other except in private games.And reviewing their games alot of them are together and the way they talk they are friends,and refer to the game that andy joined in another one,that the dumbass took his turn go take yours and finish him.nothing fair about what they did or how.rules violation secret diplomacy from the other game even.

Couldn't agree more. If you check the log history, I am a target in each and every one of their attacks. Had that not happened, I would have easily taken them over (had SA after the first or second move). It's really unfortunate to run into something like this.

by **Symmetry** on Wed Nov 09, 2011 3:16 pm

Andwyn wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:yea this one is bad if they are wanting to play a private game then they need to set it up as one,but if they are playing as friends and do a united attack on someone like that then they need to be banned from playing with each other except in private games.And reviewing their games alot of them are together and the way they talk they are friends,and refer to the game that andy joined in another one,that the dumbass took his turn go take yours and finish him.nothing fair about what they did or how.rules violation secret diplomacy from the other game even.

Couldn't agree more. If you check the log history, I am a target in each and every one of their attacks. Had that not happened, I would have easily taken them over (had SA after the first or second move). It's really unfortunate to run into something like this.

Hmm, have to disagree, looking through the logs I can't see any point where you would have easily taken over these three players. It looks like you over-extended yourself, and are now claiming that you were on the verge of knocking out three players easily. Sorry, I don't buy that line. Stick with the facts, and don't claim that you would have easily taken them out.

by **jgordon1111** on Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:01 am

he held the bonus after his second turn which is in the log which was a big advantage over everyone else at that point,maybe not a game winner but still none the less,ahead in the game.And i know sym you have to argue everything even when evidence points to the best possible conclusion.Quit trolling and play a game once in a while,after all it's a game sight for players not trollers.

by **Symmetry** on Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:51 pm

?
Weird. I'll argue the point when I think there's a point to argue. You yourself seem to think it wasn't quite the clear cut case of having a game winning advantage taken away on the verge of knocking three players out in a single blow.

There are other merits to this complaint, and they can be discussed. There are points that can be criticised too. Pointing them out is not trolling, especially when you seem to partially agree.

That said, I think my post could have been phrased with a better tone. Apologies to the OP.