VicFontaine wrote:This exchange is short-sighted. We have a Stalingrad map...do y'all have any idea how many millions perished in that brutal assaultāthe rape, the brutality? No one says a thing.
In any case, the map is completed and I'll post an image later. If you don't like it, don't play it. Pretty simple.
OK, a big difference between these maps are.
Stalingrad = battle.
Hiroshima = slaughter.
Seamus76 wrote:What I don't like is the knee-jerk reaction to the "topic", and possibly the direction the foundry is heading, if in fact this is how things are going to be. We need to let people at least develop maps and ideas that can be worked on, rather than totally tear them apart before there is a chance to work out the controversial/offensive natures of the maps.
Seamus, there is no knee jerk reaction to this or your one. It is really a bit of common sense. There are some battles that are battles, this was a lone planes dropping one bomb. Its effects are felt today. There does seem to be a few of these more controversial maps popping up when we have a Melting Pot of ideas full to the brim with good ones.
Seamus76 wrote:Those who forget history are destined to repeat it.
Over and over on this map.
Peter Gibbons wrote:But surely there have been much darker hours over the course of humanity
Name one that killed so many in as little time. This is a piece of history that as you said will be debated and while I agree with the US decision to drop the two bombs, I just cannot see a map coming out of a single point in time.
VicFontaine wrote:Who's in charge?
lack - the great turtle in the sky. Praise be his wisdom and forgiveness for our sins as we do not want to tarnish the shiny lustre of his shell.