soundman wrote:I've been here and reading. I just don't have much to add.
drunkmonkey wrote:4 days left...we need something.
Soundman has posted 3 times since the joke stage:
soundman wrote:Since we don't have much time left and need some info, Vote Conzocool
This was vote #7 on conzocool
soundman wrote:MoB Deadly wrote:Conzocool may have cleverly picked a role that is hard to verify by other town.
The thing is I don't think he could have come up with that role because he's a new player. I've never heard of it before. Course he could have done some looking and found it... Anyway I think the BG case is interesting and warrants a look but zimmah going after blake in the way he has gets my vote.
Vote zimmah
This was vote #5 on zimmah
soundman wrote:Go to sleep, come back to almost 3 pages. Unvote I believe him. Time to look go look back for another case.
I see no substance; just 2 bandwagon votes, followed by an unvote while he waits for the next one.
Vote soundman to get something going.
My first vote didn't have much substance but we needed pressure. I thought my second post did have some substance though. And I thought I gave a good reason for my vote. Also when I said "time to look for a new case" I was directing it at myself. I'm not the kind to sit back the whole time and wait for others to bring up a case.
So let me get this straight, you're not the kind to sit back and wait, but you have nothing to add?
If you're so interested in scumhunting, why not bring up a case on your own then instead of just disappearing into the woodwork?
I agree that we have gotten several claims today, but I think one more case that's justified is ok to me.
vote soundman for submarining, bandwagonning, and feigned activity.