BGtheBrain wrote:Also Drunkmonkey with 17 alive it only takes 9 to lynch so Zimmah was at L-1
Guess it was a good thing no one hammered. I believe him.
Moderator: Community Team
BGtheBrain wrote:Also Drunkmonkey with 17 alive it only takes 9 to lynch so Zimmah was at L-1
blakebowling wrote:Unvote
I believe him as well, however you could have avoided the claim by not being so hasty and awkward in your arguments.
BGtheBrain wrote:I think its a valid claim. Rambo was all about being in the jungle and claiming bulletproof wouldve been easier than claiming something that Flor could confirm or deny.
BGtheBrain wrote:By the end of the game if 1 of the 2 turns up scum theyre both cooked.
BGtheBrain wrote:By the end of the game if 1 of the 2 turns up scum theyre both cooked.
new guy1 wrote:unvote, considering the role that you revealed, it seems logical to me.
PS- i dont know how someone can call it bandwaggoning when there is so much evidence pointed towards the person. like i said earlier, its my second game so i havent quite picked up good methods of finding evidence...
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
BGtheBrain wrote:I think this is a valid case, but whateverBGtheBrain wrote:Mr S you act like I was wanting to lynch a proven townie(lynch mongering). I was weighing the pros and cons of lynching someone. As for my mini-crusade against BB, I wanted answers and I got them. Hardly a Crusade. Unless of course you are trying to use words which would demonize me and make me appear scummy. You also claim OMGUS on me because I asked where the hell Blake was on D1? What since votes me I shouldnt be allowed to ask him any questions.
Mr S I consider you to be a very experienced player which makes me believe the way you made your message to paint me as villainous (Mini-Crusade and Lynch Mongering) and OMGUS accusation can not be a mistake, but I feel it is very intentional.
Vote Mr Squirrel
Im sure you will respond with another OMGUS accusation,but I dont really care.
I know Im town and I know you are trying a little to hard to make me appear not town.
From what I gather, the logic behind that statement is that if you are faking you claim, you may have used your scum mate as the person that you claim to have tracked, either because you know what action she took, or you can rely on her to not confirm your false statement. Accordingly, if you turn out to be scum then we will be suspicious of Flores as to how you came to know her action. If Flores comes up as scum without an ability that could plausibly have been used Sully night 1, then we will suspect you of having lied. If Flores comes up as scum, but one with an ability that could have been used on Sully night 1, like Mafia Framer, then it doesn't prove you to be scum, but makes your claim less confirmed as you could have used your knowledge as scum mates to fake your action.zimmah wrote:i don't really understand this. if floris is scum, so am i? i never said floris was not scum, i don't even know why he visited sully, i just know he did.BGtheBrain wrote:By the end of the game if 1 of the 2 turns up scum theyre both cooked.
spiesr wrote:From what I gather, the logic behind that statement is that if you are faking you claim, you may have used your scum mate as the person that you claim to have tracked, either because you know what action she took, or you can rely on her to not confirm your false statement. Accordingly, if you turn out to be scum then we will be suspicious of Flores as to how you came to know her action. If Flores comes up as scum without an ability that could plausibly have been used Sully night 1, then we will suspect you of having lied. If Flores comes up as scum, but one with an ability that could have been used on Sully night 1, like Mafia Framer, then it doesn't prove you to be scum, but makes your claim less confirmed as you could have used your knowledge as scum mates to fake your action.zimmah wrote:i don't really understand this. if floris is scum, so am i? i never said floris was not scum, i don't even know why he visited sully, i just know he did.BGtheBrain wrote:By the end of the game if 1 of the 2 turns up scum theyre both cooked.
safariguy5 wrote:Ok, I'm back and I notice obviously the big case on zimmah + the claim.
Now, do I think the case was valid? Absolutely. The way you react to pressure says just as much about you as regular posting does. Extreme defensiveness, throwing OMGUS'es everywhere, zimmah looked like a textbook scum getting nervous and cracking under pressure. Calling everyone who jumps on your wagon also doesn't help.
Now that he claimed, I could plausibly see how Rambo could be a tracker role (considering First Blood was him vs cops in a wilderness).
There is one thing I'd like to point out however. zimmah saying that a no lynch on Day 1 was detrimental to town is not absolutely true. No lynching is no information gained is detrimental, but we did get a claim out of conozo, so I don't consider it necessarily a wasted day.
As for the secondary case on BG vs Mr. S, I feel that Mr. S has a point. When you vote for someone, you need to attach some reasoning, so that screenshot was appropriate during the original vote BG, not after the fact.
vote BG
zimmah wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Ok, I'm back and I notice obviously the big case on zimmah + the claim.
Now, do I think the case was valid? Absolutely. The way you react to pressure says just as much about you as regular posting does. Extreme defensiveness, throwing OMGUS'es everywhere, zimmah looked like a textbook scum getting nervous and cracking under pressure. Calling everyone who jumps on your wagon also doesn't help.
Now that he claimed, I could plausibly see how Rambo could be a tracker role (considering First Blood was him vs cops in a wilderness).
There is one thing I'd like to point out however. zimmah saying that a no lynch on Day 1 was detrimental to town is not absolutely true. No lynching is no information gained is detrimental, but we did get a claim out of conozo, so I don't consider it necessarily a wasted day.
As for the secondary case on BG vs Mr. S, I feel that Mr. S has a point. When you vote for someone, you need to attach some reasoning, so that screenshot was appropriate during the original vote BG, not after the fact.
vote BG
so, defending against false accusions is scummy?
safariguy5 wrote:zimmah wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Ok, I'm back and I notice obviously the big case on zimmah + the claim.
Now, do I think the case was valid? Absolutely. The way you react to pressure says just as much about you as regular posting does. Extreme defensiveness, throwing OMGUS'es everywhere, zimmah looked like a textbook scum getting nervous and cracking under pressure. Calling everyone who jumps on your wagon also doesn't help.
Now that he claimed, I could plausibly see how Rambo could be a tracker role (considering First Blood was him vs cops in a wilderness).
There is one thing I'd like to point out however. zimmah saying that a no lynch on Day 1 was detrimental to town is not absolutely true. No lynching is no information gained is detrimental, but we did get a claim out of conozo, so I don't consider it necessarily a wasted day.
As for the secondary case on BG vs Mr. S, I feel that Mr. S has a point. When you vote for someone, you need to attach some reasoning, so that screenshot was appropriate during the original vote BG, not after the fact.
vote BG
so, defending against false accusions is scummy?
Accusing everyone of jumping on your wagon as scum is hyperdefensive. Logic not volume should be your way of convincing people you're not mafia. Claiming that everyone voting you is either mafia or jokevoting does nothing to convince me that you're town.
zimmah wrote:Logic not volume should be your way of convincing people you're not mafia
i am using both logic and volume, but mostly because i need volume because most of you are twisitng my words.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users