Moderator: Community Team
BGtheBrain wrote:So Blake, where were you on D1? You know whats not helpful? A guy who votes himself and disappers....
BGtheBrain wrote:below is my logic. The deadline was coming and there were alot of inactives. After Conzo's claim, I believed him and as stated we needed someone. I clearly pointed out you were too quiet (saying nothing but voting yourself).
If anyone should be pressured here, it should be you.
blakebowling wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:So Blake, where were you on D1? You know whats not helpful? A guy who votes himself and disappers....
I didn't intentionally disappear, work has been hectic, and the little time I did have to read the thread I couldn't think of anything quality to say.
From what I'm seeing now, you put absolutely no logic behind voting me. Which I don't understand.
blakebowling wrote:I voted myself early as a joke vote, and I didn't have much time after that (with work last week). I actually completely missed the post with your logic, and I now understand.
Unvote.
After reading a bit more, I'm not exactly sure where we go. Conzocool has been mentioned. But as has been said before, I'm not sure that's the best thing for us to do.
drunkmonkey wrote:What? Blake voted for himself in the joke stage, and never showed up to change it. Lots of people stuck with their joke votes. I don't see why this one is actually drawing discussion.
Due to the fact that I already had you FOS'd for bandwagonning on D1, and now you seem to be doing it again:
vote zimmah
zimmah wrote:drunkmonkey wrote:What? Blake voted for himself in the joke stage, and never showed up to change it. Lots of people stuck with their joke votes. I don't see why this one is actually drawing discussion.
Due to the fact that I already had you FOS'd for bandwagonning on D1, and now you seem to be doing it again:
vote zimmah
i;m the first on to vote for blake, and besides i made it clear what my reason for voting is.
there is no reason to vote no-lynch on day 1, and voting for yourself while going away for the rest of the day is basicly voting a no-lynch.
FOS drunkmonkey for being ignorant.
new guy1 wrote:im sorry, i have no input at the moment... but to be completly honest, this is only my second game, and i have no clue what FOS means... can anyone shine some light on me?
Finger of Suspicion. Used to indicate that you find someone suspicious but are not going to vote them, for whatever reason (often because you are voting for someone even more suspicious).
drunkmonkey wrote:zimmah wrote:drunkmonkey wrote:What? Blake voted for himself in the joke stage, and never showed up to change it. Lots of people stuck with their joke votes. I don't see why this one is actually drawing discussion.
Due to the fact that I already had you FOS'd for bandwagonning on D1, and now you seem to be doing it again:
vote zimmah
i;m the first on to vote for blake, and besides i made it clear what my reason for voting is.
there is no reason to vote no-lynch on day 1, and voting for yourself while going away for the rest of the day is basicly voting a no-lynch.
FOS drunkmonkey for being ignorant.
My bad - I confused the weak case on BG with the weak case on blake.
The reason for my vote - you weren't using blake's inactivity as your case. Your case was based on whom he placed his joke vote on (himself), which I think is about as weak as a case can get. At the end of the day, there were 3 others still on joke votes and 4 who hadn't voted at all. Now, I understand the need to pressure someone; I just feel you're pushing too hard on a rather irrelevant detail.
I'm not as strongly against you now that I realize you cast the first vote. But, rather than FOS you for the second day in a row, I'll keep my vote for now.
zimmah wrote:drunkmonkey wrote:zimmah wrote:drunkmonkey wrote:What? Blake voted for himself in the joke stage, and never showed up to change it. Lots of people stuck with their joke votes. I don't see why this one is actually drawing discussion.
Due to the fact that I already had you FOS'd for bandwagonning on D1, and now you seem to be doing it again:
vote zimmah
i;m the first on to vote for blake, and besides i made it clear what my reason for voting is.
there is no reason to vote no-lynch on day 1, and voting for yourself while going away for the rest of the day is basicly voting a no-lynch.
FOS drunkmonkey for being ignorant.
My bad - I confused the weak case on BG with the weak case on blake.
The reason for my vote - you weren't using blake's inactivity as your case. Your case was based on whom he placed his joke vote on (himself), which I think is about as weak as a case can get. At the end of the day, there were 3 others still on joke votes and 4 who hadn't voted at all. Now, I understand the need to pressure someone; I just feel you're pushing too hard on a rather irrelevant detail.
I'm not as strongly against you now that I realize you cast the first vote. But, rather than FOS you for the second day in a row, I'll keep my vote for now.
i think you misunderstood.
placing a jokevote (on yourself) WHILE being inactive (while knowing that vote is the last vote you'll be able to make for that day) is basicly the same as a no-lynch vote. THÁT is the reason why i voted him, because he was basicly trying to hide a no-lynch vote behind a jokevote.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
pancakemix wrote:During the joke vote stage, voting oneself is pretty normal. The inactivity that followed wasn't his fault. Methinks you're reading a bit too much into this.
jonty125 wrote:I think zimmah needs to calm down on his case against blake it isn't like the deadline is knocking on the door and I don't really feel their is a case.
zimmah wrote:jonty125 wrote:I think zimmah needs to calm down on his case against blake it isn't like the deadline is knocking on the door and I don't really feel their is a case.
you're about the 3rd or 4th one to tell me my case on blake is wrong, but none of you provides a better case.
blakebowling wrote:zimmah wrote:jonty125 wrote:I think zimmah needs to calm down on his case against blake it isn't like the deadline is knocking on the door and I don't really feel their is a case.
you're about the 3rd or 4th one to tell me my case on blake is wrong, but none of you provides a better case.
Lets analyze you then. Why are you jumping from person to person. Do you not care who dies today?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users