Conquer Club

Hiroshima - 1945

Have an idea for a map? Discuss ideas and concepts here.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby koontz1973 on Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:45 pm

VicFontaine wrote:This exchange is short-sighted. We have a Stalingrad map...do y'all have any idea how many millions perished in that brutal assaultā€”the rape, the brutality? No one says a thing.

In any case, the map is completed and I'll post an image later. If you don't like it, don't play it. Pretty simple.


OK, a big difference between these maps are.
Stalingrad = battle.
Hiroshima = slaughter.

Seamus76 wrote:What I don't like is the knee-jerk reaction to the "topic", and possibly the direction the foundry is heading, if in fact this is how things are going to be. We need to let people at least develop maps and ideas that can be worked on, rather than totally tear them apart before there is a chance to work out the controversial/offensive natures of the maps.

Seamus, there is no knee jerk reaction to this or your one. It is really a bit of common sense. There are some battles that are battles, this was a lone planes dropping one bomb. Its effects are felt today. There does seem to be a few of these more controversial maps popping up when we have a Melting Pot of ideas full to the brim with good ones.
Seamus76 wrote:Those who forget history are destined to repeat it.

Over and over on this map. ;)
Peter Gibbons wrote:But surely there have been much darker hours over the course of humanity

Name one that killed so many in as little time. This is a piece of history that as you said will be debated and while I agree with the US decision to drop the two bombs, I just cannot see a map coming out of a single point in time.
VicFontaine wrote:Who's in charge?

lack - the great turtle in the sky. Praise be his wisdom and forgiveness for our sins as we do not want to tarnish the shiny lustre of his shell. ;)
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant koontz1973
 
Posts: 6960
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:57 am

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby thenobodies80 on Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:57 am

VicFontaine wrote:Then can I get approval if I do a map based on nuclear attack and its aftermath that isn't based on Hiroshima or Nagasaki? Something fictional?


Yes it would make it more, really more feasible.
As I said your draft is not shit.
Is the current idea that is totally a bad idea.

QoH wrote:Has anyone even looked at the draft VF posted? I think it's actually interesting. Perhaps come up with more game play uniqueness, but I don't see how it's offensive in the least.


Yes, it was the first thing I did when he posted the draft.
I also think that his draft has potential, but Hiroshima is a bad idea to use that draft.

Seamus76 wrote:The point of the mods should be to direct the map makers and the foundry in a positive, entertaining direction rather than dictating what will and what should not be attempted.


Is what I'm doing and VF can tell you the same. He has sent me a PM and I gave him a reply yesterday clearly saying him that it was late and I had to give him any other reply today.
Everything else is just bullshit.
Please people stop to explain to us how to do our job, if you want to express your opinion, then it's ok, but speak about the maps not about how you think we should do our job....the foundry has worked in this way and works in this way. If you think you can do it better than me or anyone else is in blue, please apply for that.
I want to remember again to everyone that mapmaking is a privilege not a right. (like when you ask for tournaments privileges).
I was asked to represent "Lackattack voice" when we speak about maps and I acceppted the role, so if you can't live with the idea that the owner of this site won't like this map and I'm telling you this becuase I KNOW THIS, then .....do you want I ask him to come here and post the same? And maybe I can do the same with all map? OMG, there's always someone in life that is there to tell you what you can do or what you can't do. And in this case it's really clear why this map is a bad idea! So, please stop bitching
Mapmaking is a privilege, not a right, it has precise rules and limits, it's not anarchy, and it's in this way because the owner of the site wants it is in this way.

-----------------

Now coming back on more constructive things, and trying to speak about maps instead of arguining about how I (and my team) do the job...we can go further.

VF yes, your gameplay is not bad, simply do not use it with hiroshima.
If you say Hiroshima, the people can think just one thing....and it's not a good thought...and you know that it's in this way.

Thank you so much for your collaboration. :)
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thenobodies80
 
Posts: 5400
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:30 am
Location: Milan

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby VicFontaine on Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:14 am

Alright. I'll rework it with the same gameplay. There's been some complaints about the gameplay, but I designed it because I would play a map, and love it, with a gameplay like this: EVERY tert is a killer tert with a Russian Winter or a Killer Neutral kind-of-thing. It makes for VERY interesting gameplay, I think, when everyone starts with about 300 men on the board, but by Round 5, we're down to about 40, and by Round 8, we're fighting just to stay alive.

Attrition.
"It is a good day to die."
User avatar
Lieutenant VicFontaine
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:34 pm
Location: The Dominion

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby Industrial Helix on Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:26 am

Definitely interesting imo... kinda like dust bowl. I say go with it, but it doesn't wholly make sense to me as there weren't any armies on the ground at hiroshima, and I'm usually of the opinion that if you're gonna do a historical map, do it so it best reflects actual events. I wonder if going for a sci-fi theme might work better
Sketchblog [Update 07/25/11]: http://indyhelixsketch.blogspot.com/
Living in Japan [Update 07/17/11]: http://mirrorcountryih.blogspot.com/
Russian Revolution map for ConquerClub [07/20/11]: viewtopic.php?f=241&t=116575
User avatar
Cook Industrial Helix
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:49 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby VicFontaine on Tue Oct 11, 2011 9:04 am

Industrial Helix wrote:Definitely interesting imo... kinda like dust bowl. I say go with it, but it doesn't wholly make sense to me as there weren't any armies on the ground at hiroshima, and I'm usually of the opinion that if you're gonna do a historical map, do it so it best reflects actual events. I wonder if going for a sci-fi theme might work better


I've already got (what would be) the most complex CC map in the works, and it's Sci-Fi.

I'd like this one to be historical, so I'm going to go with an alternative-history map a la Harry Turtledove style.
"It is a good day to die."
User avatar
Lieutenant VicFontaine
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:34 pm
Location: The Dominion

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby Peter Gibbons on Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:28 pm

koontz1973 wrote:
Peter Gibbons wrote:But surely there have been much darker hours over the course of humanity

Name one that killed so many in as little time. This is a piece of history that as you said will be debated and while I agree with the US decision to drop the two bombs, I just cannot see a map coming out of a single point in time.

Not sure why I have to name one that killed so many in as little time. The assertion had nothing to do with details like that. The assertion was that it was the darkest hour in humanity--full stop. And it's not. I suspect that if you agree with the US decision to drop the bombs you would also agree with that statement.

By no means I am saying the atomic bombs were a good thing. But surely our "darkest hours" would be constituted by incidents driven by pure evil or unequivocal and completely unjustifiable barbarism. Mass death is not a good thing, but surely reasonable minds can at least concede there were honorable merits that might have justified the action. The same cannot be said of the Holocaust, dozens of attempts at genocide throughout world history, the slave trade and other massacres both big and small.
User avatar
Major Peter Gibbons
 
Posts: 1077
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:21 am
Location: Washington, DC

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby Minister X on Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:51 pm

VicFontaine wrote:If you don't like it, don't play it. Pretty simple.

My two cents: even if this map was done with superb sensitivity to history and the victims, and even if it was a great game to play, I wouldn't want to play it. It's depressing. I'll be spending at least an hour or two staring at a map of one of the worst sights ever to hit human eyes. All the photos I've ever seen of the post-bomb city, with and without survivors, would keep popping into my head. IMHO CC should be a fun place. At least Stalingrad can be studied as a battle, with strategies and tactics, and not just a slaughter.

For the record, I'm not against Truman's decision. I'm grateful the bomb was invented and I think dropping it was the right thing to do. I believe it saved many lives, not only in WWII but also during the cold war that followed hard on its heels.
User avatar
Major Minister X
 
Posts: 424
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:45 pm

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby natty dread on Wed Oct 12, 2011 6:04 pm

Oh yeah, dropping the bomb was the right thing to do but hey I don't want to look at the results, they're depressing. Oh and also we should respect the victims and not make a map about it. Because it was pure slaughter. But yeah, it was the right thing to do.



What the f*ck???????
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class natty dread
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby Gillipig on Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:12 pm

natty_dread wrote:Oh yeah, dropping the bomb was the right thing to do but hey I don't want to look at the results, they're depressing. Oh and also we should respect the victims and not make a map about it. Because it was pure slaughter. But yeah, it was the right thing to do.



What the f*ck???????

Americans look at Hiroshima in the same way I can imagine Germany would've look at the holocaust if they would've won the war. Inhuman but "necessary". Inhuman is never necessary. Just because they would've lost a lot of soldiers trying to defeat Japan in a regular war doesn't make killing more than hundred thousand civilians justifiable. History will always be biased. Because the winner writes it.
AoG for President of the World!!
I promise he will put George W. Bush to shame!
User avatar
Lieutenant Gillipig
 
Posts: 3565
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby Teflon Kris on Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:16 pm

Interesting.

I can't see what happened after the bomb being a setting of interest to people - take over a wasteland?

However, I'm not sure that we should necessarily shy away from the 'darkest hour' (although it certainly wasn't humanity that dropped the bomb). The establishments in which we live don't mind reminding us of nazi atrocities, its certainly worth occassionally remembering this one. In fact, I might suggest it at work, a themed education day, one minutes silence.

If there were some kind of setting that was of interest, some kind of heroism or some kind of positive outcome possible in the theme then it might be a goer. As nobodies says, I just cant see how you can get that kind of spin on one brutal act. Other war settings are brutal but have some kind of inherent idea of defeating a more evil enemy etc., a casue to fight for.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Teflon Kris
 
Posts: 4236
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 4:39 pm
Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby Industrial Helix on Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:39 pm

You know, I'm reading Pompeii by Robert Harris and I was thinking about the mechanics of this map... and it seems to me that Pompeii and Mt. Vesuvius would be a good setting for this type of gameplay... what with the intense heat and sulfur causing decay plus lava obstacles... Volcanos are a lot less controversial than the Bomb too.
Sketchblog [Update 07/25/11]: http://indyhelixsketch.blogspot.com/
Living in Japan [Update 07/17/11]: http://mirrorcountryih.blogspot.com/
Russian Revolution map for ConquerClub [07/20/11]: viewtopic.php?f=241&t=116575
User avatar
Cook Industrial Helix
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:49 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby VicFontaine on Wed Nov 09, 2011 11:19 pm

Is that historically distant enough that my time would not be wasted? If so, I'll create the map within a few weeks. That would not be hard.
"It is a good day to die."
User avatar
Lieutenant VicFontaine
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:34 pm
Location: The Dominion

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby Industrial Helix on Sat Nov 12, 2011 11:08 am

Pompeii is fair game Hiroshima is not so much.
Sketchblog [Update 07/25/11]: http://indyhelixsketch.blogspot.com/
Living in Japan [Update 07/17/11]: http://mirrorcountryih.blogspot.com/
Russian Revolution map for ConquerClub [07/20/11]: viewtopic.php?f=241&t=116575
User avatar
Cook Industrial Helix
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:49 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Hiroshima - 1945

Postby IcePack on Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:54 pm

I'd play the game either way, hiro or Pompeii. I personally don't see the problem, but if so many people dislike the idea maybe Pompeii is better.

IcePack
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
User avatar
Major IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16631
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Previous

Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users