Sniper08 wrote:what was wrong with the old trees? i didnt think they need changing. the trees look more like the bushes, revert back to the old trees they were much better.
Back and they will stay like this now.
Latest Version [41]
Large
Small
Moderator: Cartographers
Sniper08 wrote:what was wrong with the old trees? i didnt think they need changing. the trees look more like the bushes, revert back to the old trees they were much better.
Sniper08 wrote:do you need to list the ibutho's in the legend? i think its obvious which are the bonus areas.
the trees in the legends base looks more square then round possible fix?
perhaps a lighter colour of green on the trees aswell as idk how the bushes could be light colour and the trees cant since they are both supposed to be from the same environment.
the sword in the legend could do with less opticity as right now it takes a little away from the wording of that part of the legend imo.
Sully wrote:Make sure your terminology is consistent (g.e. you used the two separate words, "territory" and "region", in the legend, even though they were referring to the same thing. Go with region).
-Sully
Bruceswar wrote:The trees do not match the overhead look you have. Something has to give. Maybe a new tree?
mr. CD wrote:I like the iButhos now.
First sentence looks like you have to capture the British Officers & Chard & Bromhead. If you use : instead of , after British Officers that should be fixed.
lostatlimbo wrote:If you are going to go with the flat trees, I really think you need to try again with the bushes. The two styles are in stark contrast.
Can you try to make a smaller version of the tree to look like bushes?
Sniper08 wrote:tree's dont look good like bushes , revert back to fix as nothin was wrong with old trees imo.
isaiah40 wrote:Your arrows are still pixelated.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users