Moderator: Cartographers
natty_dread wrote:Also... 500 dpi? Not going to happen. You realize the images would be, umm... gigantic? I can't think of a large enough adjective...
I'd say 100-150 dpi is pretty much the max.
DiM wrote:natty_dread wrote:Also... 500 dpi? Not going to happen. You realize the images would be, umm... gigantic? I can't think of a large enough adjective...
I'd say 100-150 dpi is pretty much the max.
http://www.rideau-info.com/photos/mythdpi.html
natty_dread wrote:DiM wrote:natty_dread wrote:Also... 500 dpi? Not going to happen. You realize the images would be, umm... gigantic? I can't think of a large enough adjective...
I'd say 100-150 dpi is pretty much the max.
http://www.rideau-info.com/photos/mythdpi.html
That has what to do with anything?
A typical game board is approx. 24-26 inches wide. If Rb0 wants to print the boards at 500 dpi, that means the images need to be 500x24 pixels in width. That is, we'd have to create images of ~100 megapixels, or 10 000 pixels wide.
Also, Dim, you insult my intelligence when you assume I don't know what DPI means.
RedBaron0 wrote:I just picked a number... when I resized Japan after to 500 dpi
MrBenn wrote:Is that map stuck onto a scrabble board?
RedBaron0 wrote:I'm not worried about the ratios much, I've got square and long boards. Since I'm working with preexisting boards I can likely run into an issue of a little bit of space in one direction or another, but I was always planing on painting the edges and the back of the board.(spray paint)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users