Something has been bugging me about this map for a while I couldn't put my finger on it and didn't want say anything without having something constructive to say. But I think I worked out what has been bothering me. It is the picture you have used in the background. The content picture itself is fine, but it is blurred and doesn't tie in well with everything else on the map. You territory names, legends, the map itself are all very simplistic, crisp and clean. Your map also has some subtle bevels giving the map a nice 3D tone, but you background image is flat and very 2D. Now I don't think that there is anything graphically wrong with the background or the map but I just think together they clash. You know what I mean?
I am not sure there is a quick and easy solution but you seem like a bright guy, I am sure you could work something out, if you agree with that I have said.
p.s. this offends me
danfrank wrote:I absolutely love how they have knitpicked this map for YEARS yes YEARS
Why ? Land and Sea map which graphically is terrible didnt receive a tenth of this . Along with dozens of others..