Mr Changsha- Intentional Deadbeating, MissingTurns[CLOSED]ES

[nikola_milicki]

Whatever your interpretation of the ruling, Changsha missed turns in only 1 game. It wasn't a systematic attempt.

i didnt say that he broke the rules, just that intentionally missing turns on a regular basis is, even if it is for a strategic gain.

Well you'd have to prove intent, and only certain settings (like City Mogul) would that be for strategic gain. Missing turns in most settings are not strategically beneficial.

lol he missed turns in this 1 particular game but took other turns, did some sitting on other account/s at the same time plus posted in forums and u say it wasn't systematic?? or better say intentional.. w/e it was, it was lame and ridiculous.. theres no good reason for it, nothing to gain.. the only reason he missed is him being a sore loser.. and thats what we wanted for all to see..

[ljex]

Whatever your interpretation of the ruling, Changsha missed turns in only 1 game. It wasn't a systematic attempt.

i didnt say that he broke the rules, just that intentionally missing turns on a regular basis is, even if it is for a strategic gain.

Well you'd have to prove intent, and only certain settings (like City Mogul) would that be for strategic gain. Missing turns in most settings are not strategically beneficial.

try out the fact that at times it is beneficial on almost any casual freestyle setting. And its easy to prove intent when it is repeated or people take other turns but not those.

[safariguy5]

Whatever your interpretation of the ruling, Changsha missed turns in only 1 game. It wasn't a systematic attempt.

i didnt say that he broke the rules, just that intentionally missing turns on a regular basis is, even if it is for a strategic gain.

Well you'd have to prove intent, and only certain settings (like City Mogul) would that be for strategic gain. Missing turns in most settings are not strategically beneficial.

lol he missed turns in this 1 particular game but took other turns, did some sitting on other account/s at the same time plus posted in forums and u say it wasn't systematic?? or better say intentional.. w/e it was, it was lame and ridiculous.. theres no good reason for it, nothing to gain.. the only reason he missed is him being a sore loser.. and thats what we wanted for all to see..

So sore loser. Rate and tag accordingly. Spurious report in this case then.

Whatever your interpretation of the ruling, Changsha missed turns in only 1 game. It wasn't a systematic attempt.

i didnt say that he broke the rules, just that intentionally missing turns on a regular basis is, even if it is for a strategic gain.

Well you'd have to prove intent, and only certain settings (like City Mogul) would that be for strategic gain. Missing turns in most settings are not strategically beneficial.

try out the fact that at times it is beneficial on almost any casual freestyle setting. And its easy to prove intent when it is repeated or people take other turns but not those.

Again, not a freestyle game, and only happened in this one game. I've had games slip through the crack and I'm sure he was in other games in the challenge that he finished. I seriously see no reason to warn Mr. C, much less anything more serious.

[General Mojo]

being a sore loser still aint against the rules

why dont u just let this die, Mr sore loser eh

Whatever your interpretation of the ruling, Changsha missed turns in only 1 game. It wasn't a systematic attempt.

i didnt say that he broke the rules, just that intentionally missing turns on a regular basis is, even if it is for a strategic gain.

Well you'd have to prove intent, and only certain settings (like City Mogul) would that be for strategic gain. Missing turns in most settings are not strategically beneficial.

lol he missed turns in this 1 particular game but took other turns, did some sitting on other account/s at the same time plus posted in forums and u say it wasn't systematic?? or better say intentional.. w/e it was, it was lame and ridiculous.. theres no good reason for it, nothing to gain.. the only reason he missed is him being a sore loser.. and thats what we wanted for all to see..

Nice to see that CC took no action here....i guess you are allowed to flame whomever you want whenever you want if you belong to a certain protected class of the CC community...

[Robinette]

wow...

this was an interesting read, but overall, this is beyond pathetic...

shame on you thota, shame on you.

[sjnap]

being a sore loser still aint against the rules

lucky you

[nikola_milicki]

I wonder if either of u had noticed any flaming in the challenge thread..certainly not wasting my time to check..

no Robinette, ur boobies are beyond pathetic, shame on them.

[Mr Changsha]

I wonder if either of u had noticed any flaming in the challenge thread..certainly not wasting my time to check..

no Robinette, ur boobies are beyond pathetic, shame on them.

To be perfectly honest with you, the witless crap you've been posting could be barely defined as flaming.

I mean really...

no Robinette, ur boobies are beyond pathetic, shame on them.

Are you 9?

why dont u just let this die, Mr sore loser eh

8?

Your clan actually contains some of my favourite posters (yeah, I know it is hard for you to grasp that maybe, just maybe, what I write is almost entirely in jest..but the more intelligent members of Thota - which of course is most of them - are well aware of it), but they must look at you and just squirm. You are an embarrassment. If you honestly think that this thread has done me any harm at all..

the only reason he missed is him being a sore loser.. and thats what we wanted for all to see..

..you are deluding yourself. What you have charged me with here, that I miss turns, that I sometimes give up positions, that I am far from a true first rate player...is not new. Every bandit knows my weaknesses...and accepts them.

All the CC community is seeing here is me being challenged by a child. There is no doubt some interest in such a thing, but don't for a second believe you are doing me any harm, you really aren't...I've actually pulled my punches with you (as I maintained my 'no ridiculing the idiotic' policy...up to now), even here, in this joke of a thread.

Personally, I hadn't even heard of you before, maybe many hadn't, but you can be horribly sure that any man/boy who is silly enough to write

no Robinette, ur boobies are beyond pathetic, shame on them

..has pretty much confirmed to us all that they are basically beyond scorn. To be so silly as to attack Robinette in such a fashion labels you as scum in my mind.

I held back until now (following that 'don't launch on the inherently stupid' policy of mine) but your last comment was really too much.

[Evil Semp]

This thread has lived past its usefulness. Locked.