Woodruff wrote:pimpdave wrote:
I don't swear up and down and flame you. And I haven't attacked you personally, I've just said that you did a bad job teaching your students because the baton twirling routine was terrible and boring.
That's not a personal attack?
I'd say it's a joke, and you should've expected it when you made a post you shouldn't have about your students.
Woodruff wrote:jackal31 wrote:
Woodruff.....each of those statements are about your character outside of class and is speculative of how you might be in class. So yeah, its outside the classroom we are engaging in. You keep retaliating in this fashion, and yet, when do you hold yourself accountable?
You and I definitely disagree on that point. As well, what does ANYTHING about my job (speculation or not) have to do with this case? My job should not even be discussed as far as this case goes. It is OUTSIDE OF THESE FORA and thus irrelevant. What should be discussed is what I've said and why I've said it. My job is irrelevant. Why can't you guys get that through your head? This really comes across as a form of character assassination, in my opinion.
You brought your job into it.
1) making a post you shouldn't have about your students
2) using a joke someone made in return as justification for non-student-appropriate vitrole
3) bringing your personal life and need to use your cursing rants on CC as "destressor"
This is a site with MINORS.
It is not character "assassination" to point out that you're reflecting "bad character" when you do this on a site filled with many of the same people you're supposed to be teaching.
It's not "assassination" to point out that the ethics and nature of the subject you are supposed to be teaching would suggest that your character here is questionable.
You used your classroom as justification to spout that garbage in post after post after post; so you should expect people to respond about your classroom.
Again, you're showing that anyone who disagrees with da woodie is "wrong" so you justify that by reporting them or spouting nastiness or, in cases that the OP gives examples of, both.
Then claim, "that's not fair to use this against me!"
YOU opened it up as your justification. That makes it VERY fair to point out that it's not only poor justification, it's wrong for a supposed teacher.