by Isobat on Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:01 pm
to explain my most recent turn: I saw two possibilities, either I try to take back my ship (likely a losing proposition, as had considerably more troops backing up the first wave, and I no longer had a superior number in the area to take you down), or I could take the bunker from yellow (a larger risk, but could potentially seat me in a more optimal position, owning territory not in the middle of everyone). I ended up going for the riskier proposition, but did not expect green could eliminate yellow... "
As for the "should have been happy you were attacking green": I was, but you were about to end him and take his bunkers. This was problematic for me, as that would mean that I'd be surrounded by people who's best next target would be me. I was hoping to slow your advance and take advantage of green, but my rolls were poor, and I ended up harming myself rather than setting myself up.
as for the "regardless of how much attacking they did to each other, both remained the big stacks for the entire game"... isn't that analogous to "ignore any evidence that doesn't agree with me, them having the most troops and fighting with those troops proves they cooperated"?
Linking this thread to the game chat, guessing green hasn't seen the thread yet.