pascalleke wrote:were o were i say that i am better?? pls tell me ..NO ANSWER ME PLEASE
OW SO UR BETTER THEN ME just because ur english is better? wow thanks
Where have I said that? See, how's the one baiting now? It works both ways, my friend. If someone baits you, then it's wrong and those people are horrible, but when you do the same, it's alright?
pascalleke wrote:and sorry READ THIS GOOD PLEASE ; I AM NO HUNTER SO THE ONLY PROOF I HAD WAS THOSE 5 GAMES ...AND I USED HIS NAME , JUST ................U KNOW WHAT ...THIS COSTED ME ALREADY TO MUCH ENERGY AND MY TIME .....
I personally wouldn't have minded an accusation that has some proof, but you had none. I personally expect that when someone is accusing someone else, he's supposed to have a full case going with it and not just speculation.
Obviously, now the hunters will have to take a look at this and will have to invest their time while investigating. I don't see any point in creating more work someone else without any good reason to. If you really want to catch the cheaters, it would be wise to do at least some research before posting. Just saying...
pascalleke wrote:so as i told the other guy wo is spamming my wall now ....goodluck with this
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Forgive me, but weren't you the one who first posted on his wall? If you post on someone elses wall, I think you are supposed to expect a reply, no?