Moderator: Cartographers
hulmey wrote:thats quite a good idea......u would have to scroll down but you dont need to be looking at the legend every minute....
I dont like water as a resource....i prefer the cow or something similar
mibi wrote:I dont get the third rule, how do you transport a product, and for that matter, whats a product?
Rubbish!Lt. Valerian wrote:But that is only because of the paragraph you wrote describing the process. I really don't think this is a playable map because of its extreme complexity. You can't possibly explain how it works to players without an accompanying paragraph, which cannot be placed on the game board.
yeti_c wrote:I'll have to rewrite the XML for this... but I'll hang fire for now until the idea's are finalised... I like the new 3 step process though - that works nice...
C.
Captain Crash wrote:In the legend, which I think the position and layout of is fine, you probably don't need 'factory/product' just 'product' would be sufficient as there are no factories just the final products.
DiM wrote:Captain Crash wrote:In the legend, which I think the position and layout of is fine, you probably don't need 'factory/product' just 'product' would be sufficient as there are no factories just the final products.
i put factories to better explain the logical steps resource > factory (which makes a product) > market
here's an update. corrected spelling issues moved the title and signature.
DiM wrote:boberz wrote:i think sont use the wording explained above just keep it very similar to what it is now tbh it will be hilarious when we get noob posts in the vain of "I dont get it"
i didn't understand one bit of what you just said
boberz wrote:DiM wrote:boberz wrote:i think sont use the wording explained above just keep it very similar to what it is now tbh it will be hilarious when we get noob posts in the vain of "I dont get it"
i didn't understand one bit of what you just said
sorry must have been half dead but what i tried to say was dont use the explanation on page 17ish as it is too long the one you had before was better. I believe that the explanation on page 17ish would create noob comments not understanding the wording. I hope this is more coherent
Users browsing this forum: No registered users