The Bison King wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:Just change the rest of the fonts then I think you're good to go.
Which font's are you refering to?
The text in the legend and such that still use the old font.
Moderator: Cartographers
The Bison King wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:Just change the rest of the fonts then I think you're good to go.
Which font's are you refering to?
Victor Sullivan wrote:The Bison King wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:Just change the rest of the fonts then I think you're good to go.
Which font's are you refering to?
The text in the legend and such that still use the old font.
But also, I think Mojave Desert needs to be +5. It is much more difficult to hold than Northern California, no?
The Bison King wrote:right, regarding the legend font I don't see a need to make it the same font as the territories. In fact I think it's better to keep them separate, I think visually it makes the map more readable at a glance.
Victor Sullivan wrote:The Bison King wrote:right, regarding the legend font I don't see a need to make it the same font as the territories. In fact I think it's better to keep them separate, I think visually it makes the map more readable at a glance.
Eh, I disagree. See, it's the same font as Thyseneal and it really just does not work for this map. If you want to keep the fonts separate, fine, but at least change the font you're currently using for the legend and minimap.
The Bison King wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:The Bison King wrote:right, regarding the legend font I don't see a need to make it the same font as the territories. In fact I think it's better to keep them separate, I think visually it makes the map more readable at a glance.
Eh, I disagree. See, it's the same font as Thyseneal and it really just does not work for this map. If you want to keep the fonts separate, fine, but at least change the font you're currently using for the legend and minimap.
It is not, Thyseneal used Apple Chauncey, this uses Monotype Corvisa. I don't see why it doesn't fit, it can represent the finer side of California's wine culture.
natty_dread wrote:It's called Monotype Corsiva and it's not a really great font. Along with Papyrus & Comic Sans it is one of the most overused fonts, and most professional graphicians tend to avoid those fonts, as they tend to give an "amateurish" feel due to being so overused.
Victor Sullivan wrote:natty_dread wrote:It's called Monotype Corsiva and it's not a really great font. Along with Papyrus & Comic Sans it is one of the most overused fonts, and most professional graphicians tend to avoid those fonts, as they tend to give an "amateurish" feel due to being so overused.
THANK YOU.
A general guideline for any piece of graphics with text is to never use more than 2 typefaces (not counting title). You currently have 4 typefaces, not counting title. I suggest picking 2 of them and using only them. I also suggest that neither of those 2 would be monotype corsiva.
I don't see why LA territories should be in a different font. Also use this font for the minimap numbers.
Also, will you do something about the brown border around the map? I've said it before but perhaps you missed it... it looks kinda drab and boring.
The Bison King wrote:ehh, you just don't get it. LA just comes with that font, it's the fakest place in the world, it's part of it's identity.
Basically it would be a sin for me not to use that font on LA.
The Baja font doesn't come with numbers, so I'll probably use the font I use on the inset titles for the mini map.
Also, will you do something about the brown border around the map? I've said it before but perhaps you missed it... it looks kinda drab and boring.
What do you want me to do about it?
Victor Sullivan wrote:You need to fix Bay Area's "+6".
And whatever happened to Mojave being +5??
"The golden state of" is still in corsiva... I think it might look good with the territory font.
Yeah I know but I think it looks good there. It's the title so it's ok if it's a little decorative.
The Bison King wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:And whatever happened to Mojave being +5??
I never agreed is what happened. You need a stronger case. Really try to sell me on it. I'm afraid that bumping it up to 5 will make the south 2 strong in the mid to late game.
Victor Sullivan wrote:The Bison King wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:And whatever happened to Mojave being +5??
I never agreed is what happened. You need a stronger case. Really try to sell me on it. I'm afraid that bumping it up to 5 will make the south 2 strong in the mid to late game.
Alright, here's me selling it:
- North Coast can be easily taken along with Northern California for a total of +6 with only 3 borders and 2 cities.
- Okay, so both Mojave and Northern California have 4 border territories, BUT Mojave's 4 outlying territories border a total of 6 territories, while NC only 4, 2 of those being North Coast territories.
That good enough for ya, or do I need to elaborate further?
-Sully
Users browsing this forum: No registered users