Moderator: Tournament Directors
flexmaster33 wrote:Working on a standings update for later today...also Game 6s should be out Tuesday
wolphe_ii wrote:Great tourney flex - thanks for al the hard work.
I think the Loyola-Marymount Lions won the preseason tournament. According to the rules that means they won the 6th man award. But unsure what that means exactly, and how it's used, and how it's useful.
Sorry to bother you
emerickmachine wrote:Wilmington NC hopes to be ranked in the Top 40 in the next rankings with a record of 3-1 currently and heading to a fourth win over Stanford in the semifinals of the 76 Classic. This includes being 2-0 against Top-40 teams
cazmart wrote:Breaking News from CCSPN - The University of Texas Longhorns are the 2010 EA Sports 2K Champions. They defeated Charlotte 77-71. Here is Announce Vick Ditale with his recap: "Texas was Awesome with a capital A baby! Coach Caz has him some diaper dandies that are deadly from trifecta land. They showed outstanding defense down the stretch to take over from Charlotte. These kids are big time, baby. PTP'ers on offense and defense. The Big 12 better watch this kids!"
Flex: G1 L-8, G2 W-11, G3 W-12, 2 point bonus baby and another ranked opponent goes down!
Oshida wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:Good job on the preseason rankings - Good idea doing it based on player ranks - But if I may recommend next year doing it based on the previous season then I think that'd be better.
It would be hard for him to do. There is usually a good chance that people might not re join the following year. There is no reason to give someone or other people a easier RPI because the new player might not be equal to the person he is replacing. This years is fair since they are the top 40 player points.
ViperOverLord wrote:Oshida wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:Good job on the preseason rankings - Good idea doing it based on player ranks - But if I may recommend next year doing it based on the previous season then I think that'd be better.
It would be hard for him to do. There is usually a good chance that people might not re join the following year. There is no reason to give someone or other people a easier RPI because the new player might not be equal to the person he is replacing. This years is fair since they are the top 40 player points.
I meant to reply to this before. I think a team's prior season performance should be the biggest factor. I like the idea of this tourney being based on factors exclusive to the realm of a tourney. It's preseason rank and if a rookie head coach has to pay his dues than so beit.
Another alternative would be a hybrid of rank/previous season performance, but I'm fine with just operating within the realm of college hoops games.
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass
Users browsing this forum: No registered users