Moderator: Cartographers
You should add a bonus for holding Antarctica.
Shaninon wrote: *dim*
Shaninon wrote:I wasn't trying to, sorry! >.<
GeneralN20 wrote:You should add a bonus for holding Antarctica.
I like that idea. Giving it a bonus of 2 would really make it more interesting to hold. Adding to it that the bonus wouldn't be big enough for the player to base himself solely on Antartica.
Gilligan wrote:Nigeria/Chad Sudan/Libya borders? Kinda unclear to me...
lackattack wrote:Hi Zim,
I reviewed your xml and the mapmaker tool found what looks like a bug:
Warning: Sulawesi has Sumatra as a border, but not vice versa
Asides from that, it will be easy to convert all existing World 2.0 games to World 2.1 which is what I'd like to do once this is quenched.
Thanks for all your hard work!
lt_oddball wrote:Historically, geographically and logistically (trade) I find Borneo closer to Java than to Sumatra.
I don't know what the game implications are , but if you want to be more world accurate than that should be the better border link.
(Borneo to Java and not Borneo to Sumatra).
My 2 cents..
PS and yes Antarctica should also yield a continent bonus (of 2).
People have to go through the trouble of conquering it..so it should give a bonus.
Cheers
AndyDufresne wrote:There was a way to make it not effect on going games, but it causes more headaches in the long run. The quick switch which we employed was the best option we had.
--Andy
WidowMakers wrote:That may be true but did you also know that you can hold the entire map except Antarctica and only need to defend 3 boarders!!!!!
By the time anyone has all of Europe and Asia, the game is over or the other players have NA and SA.
It is not an error. It is the way the map is. You could look at it in 2 ways. On the Classic map if you have Australia you only need to defend 1 territory. But if you own the entire map EXCEPT Australia you only need to defend 1 territory.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users