Moderator: Cartographers
the names that are on this map are not of the period. While a pick axe may seem cliche, it does reflect the period. I do not see anything that reflects the 1800's. If you were to make Tahoe "The Ponderosa" then you would be headed in the right direction.
The Bison King wrote:Those names are a little complicated and would be hard to fit don't you think?
saxitoxin wrote:The Bison King wrote:Those names are a little complicated and would be hard to fit don't you think?
just use font-face Courier 3
RedBaron0 wrote:Maybe a small icon of the Golden Bear?
I have one small issue. There are way too many cities in the Central Valley! I would eliminate Modesto and Fresno as cities and put them into the inset maps so that the city bonus is harder to obtain. Other than that, I am really looking forward to this map!!!
Also, San Fernando Valley is written in Bakersfield in the inset, but I am guessing that is to allow room for the troops.
-Borders in some areas are pixelly. Mosty on the main map in San Fran and LA, both large and small.
-Font looks terrible, especially on the small map. Function over form here, the swirly font is nice, but pixelly, and when shrunk just looks.... awful.
I recommend exploring some other fonts (check out dafont.com) although this is just my personal opinion.
-Text is overlapping borders in a couple spots and getting lost. Mostly in the insets, Yosemite too. You can just erase the border just below the letter so the letter becomes more readable.
-I REALLY hate the stars, they are taking away from the map. Anything you can come up with that might fit better? Maybe a small icon of the Golden Bear?
I don't know if it should be in place of the stars or not but that is a good point, there is no Bear on this map. There cannot be a California map without the Bear.
(like with Schwarzenegger bursting out of one corner or something).
While the map is graphically beautiful I think the Palm Tree is kind of like putting a picture of a Taco on a Mexico map.
I still think there should be some low (brown) mountains placed around the southern San Joaquin Valley/Bakersfield regions and also north/east San Diego, just to be more geographically correct. It wouldn't change the gameplay much.
Agree with natty on dafont.
Disagree with reducing the cities in Central Valley.
Palm tree looks nice.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
jefjef wrote:The game map appears to be slightly tilted in relation to the border. Noticeable at top and bottom.
jefjef wrote:The game map appears to be slightly tilted in relation to the border. Noticeable at top and bottom.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
The Bison King wrote:Agree with natty on dafont.
what? that it is a website? I know already. Why do people feel the need to keep reminding me?
EVERY SINGLE FONT ON CELTIC NATIONS WAS DOWNLOADED FROM DAFONT
The word "California" is a font I downloaded from Dafont.Disagree with reducing the cities in Central Valley.
Palm tree looks nice.
Good to know.
jefjef wrote:I'm aware of the geography but for game map appearance I see it as an enhancement to do away with the slight top tilt. I've looked and looked and looked and the top left seems to be a greater distance compared to the top right.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users