Leehar wrote:I say let this continue. Freedom of expression is a glorious thing, and some of us need more drama in our staid lives!
KORT vs TOFU - MBoooooooo
TOFU vs TIME - Issues with tasks being done on TIME?
TIME vs. BotFM - Pretty surprising really, time have done a lot better than most expectations whether mentioned or not
BotFM vs ...BotFM? - Daze?
CoF hogging all the games - AOG's One Man Clan!
One word: josko.ri - He's grown oddly silent in the 10 pages of drama, Surprising!
ok the lets put this into perspetive.
time v bofm i was having a bit of trash talk against them if you want 2 highlight this one go ahead. but you could also bring up time v grim reapers.
time v tofu. my comments were not just aimed at tofu it was towards the whole group i dont thinki asking for a set date from the clan we faced on the set week for a exchange of game nos was that bad.(it got blown out of proportion 2 much.)
tofu v kort. this one is one of the most stupidest rules i have came across and i thought clan directors had the power 2 put a stop 2 stupid rules made for active challenges.there are many problems i see with the rule that has cost tofu the challenge.
1)tofu has been told that the rules were in place at sign up. this was a wrong statement because this was a new rule that was added after the clans signed up. like with tournement organisers if any major changes are made to rules of the tourney you must contact all people involved to make sure they are happy with this and wish to continue.(was there a vote 2 say all clans agreed with the change.)
2)now when you look at the new rule 20 max games that is fair enough but the punishment of a minimum of 21 games forfieted is not a fair punishment. look at the begining rounds of the cup it was 40 game challenge so if a player makes a simple mistake and joins the 21st game they then lose the challenge automaticly even if they had won 30 of the 40 games. now dont get me wrong if a clan does not follow the rules i agree they should be punished for it but it should be a fair punishment that still gives them a chance (if it was a minor mistake)
3)now we look at the events leading up 2 korts winning of the said challenge. kort asked tofu if they could run the challenge thread for some experiance of doing it. during this period tofu were constantly asking them to update the thread kort were updating there side of it but not updating tofus this was against the guidelines in the same paragrath as the rule of the minimum 21 game forfiet. so you could say that korts inability to run a challenge thread properly rewards them with a win. this is because since the player list has a very serious consequece if breached the organiser of the cup should of stepped in and ordered kort 2 update it.
all in all the clan cup has not been run effectively due to this forfiet thing happening and when the final whistle is called no clan can say they were victorious because the loss of game that tofu has faced makes it that the best 2 clans are not in the final(this is only if the final results show tofu the victors.)
edit. also if there was a maximum limit of 20 games during a forty game challenge this should of been increased to 30 games for a 60 game challenge.
) Have we all contracted mad cow disease? 
Anyway, as I was saying....
