Moderator: Clan Directors
jpcloet wrote:For the CLA members that have access, a full spectrum of questions and concerns has been posted here around penalties and defaults beyond just this issue:
viewtopic.php?f=295&t=130838
#1_stunna wrote:You forgot to leave a flame towards Kort in your post.
jpcloet wrote:For the CLA members that have access, a full spectrum of questions and concerns has been posted here around penalties and defaults beyond just this issue:
viewtopic.php?f=295&t=130838
Foxglove wrote:jpcloet wrote:For the CLA members that have access, a full spectrum of questions and concerns has been posted here around penalties and defaults beyond just this issue:
viewtopic.php?f=295&t=130838
Perhaps we should also discuss whether or not clans are willing to graciously abide by penalties they agree to be subject to when signing up for events?
trapyoung wrote:Foxglove wrote:jpcloet wrote:For the CLA members that have access, a full spectrum of questions and concerns has been posted here around penalties and defaults beyond just this issue:
viewtopic.php?f=295&t=130838
Perhaps we should also discuss whether or not clans are willing to graciously abide by penalties they agree to be subject to when signing up for events?
LOLMoo?
Foxglove wrote:trapyoung wrote:LOLMoo?
Can't we be civil - why aren't we civil - it would be a better strategy if we were civil - bitch.
Foxglove wrote:jpcloet wrote:For the CLA members that have access, a full spectrum of questions and concerns has been posted here around penalties and defaults beyond just this issue:
viewtopic.php?f=295&t=130838
Perhaps we should also discuss whether or not clans are willing to graciously abide by penalties they agree to be subject to when signing up for events?
TheBro wrote:Maybe consider graciously antagonizing with scripts. Wait TheBro that doesn't make sense.
Foxglove wrote:jpcloet wrote:For the CLA members that have access, a full spectrum of questions and concerns has been posted here around penalties and defaults beyond just this issue:
viewtopic.php?f=295&t=130838
Perhaps we should also discuss whether or not clans are willing to graciously abide by penalties they agree to be subject to when signing up for events?
Foxglove wrote:TheBro wrote:Maybe consider graciously antagonizing with scripts. Wait TheBro that doesn't make sense.
I have publicly apologized in this thread for the script.
I generally try to apologize or make amends when I cause offense.
jpcloet wrote:I have to say this has (for the most part) been an interesting debate/argument. One of the mistakes I have made in my life is looking at what isn't happening vs what people can do and achieve, I'll leave you all with this quote for now.
“It is easier to perceive error than to find truth, for the former lies on the surface and is easily seen, while the latter lies in the depth, where few are willing to search for it.”
trapyoung wrote:Snowgun wrote:Oh, how the tune has changed from a couple pages ago.
While I personally would prefer that this rule had been implemented different initially, the rule is the rule, and the bait and switch from "We will understand either way" to "You cowardly pussies" is a little hypocritical.
Ummm... are you retarded?Chariot of Fire wrote:There must be, however, a certain number who evidently feel TOFU should be punished to the full letter of the law, or at least beyond what may be construed a fair and just compromise. Well I'm sorry, but for anyone who could entertain such an idea I have nothing but contempt. If any member of TOFU even raised such a notion then I wouldn't want him in the clan (but then I know none of them would - it's just who we are).
Yeah, you're retarded.
Chariot of Fire wrote:The fault lies entirely with me, having confused one game that I did play (USApocalypse) with a game of similar historical note (Arms Race) which I know I didn't play, and thus I exceeded my quota. Whilst it is a pity the OP was never updated (I knew we should have done the darn thing), I can only take full responsibility as the mistake lay with me and my own miscalculation.
Whilst the rule is somewhat Draconian to have to forfeit all games (the CL adopts an 'any in excess are forfeit' policy) it is nevertheless in black and white and it is KORT's prerogative to apply that ruling.
I can ask members of KORT to search their conscience or, simply, I call it a day...cap in hand...and thank one and all for what has been a most entertaining, eventful and challenging series of games. My apologies of course to all those members of TOFU who have played so well yet seemingly all in vain.
It was quite a fireworks display for what has, ultimately, been a washed-out event.
Sorry folks.
Chariot of Fire wrote:I'm compelled to express my gratitude to a whole host of people for their overwhelming support - not only every member of TOFU (which is heartwarming to say the least because I'm an absolute ogre if any of them make a mistake, for which I'm openly critical) but also third parties and even members of KORT via PM - really gratefully received, thank you.
A couple of things just to set the record straight:
- it is ironic how it was me, back in the formative days of this tourney, who requested clarification of the rule on exceeding player quota. I honestly have to say I wasn't aware of what the penalty that was decided was though - this can be the problem with edited posts, as an edit isn't highlighted - and I probably would have commented that 'total forfeiture of all games' seemed rather excessive. Others would seem to agree. That said, regardless of what the rule is it wouldn't have changed the oversight I made. It was simply an honest mistake, not trying to gain any advantage.
- before anyone puts any more words in the mouths of KORT it should be noted that no one in their clan has stated his or her intent to uphold the rule (which is within their right), thus any aspersions that they are doing so are ill-founded and premature. It must be sorely tempting to put me in my place, especially given some of the slings and arrows that have been cast over the course of this challenge, yet ultimately this is a gaming web site whose principles are of fair play in a competitive environment.
I for one know that the sense of community can be strengthened, repaired even, and that a moral victory can be won simply on the basis of a decision, whilst I sit in my corner eating some humble pie.
Culs De Sac wrote:So in reality, the only choice the public had given KORT was to apply no penalty at all. They were to finish out the war w/o exercising any penalty and hopefully advancing based on the merits of those games.
Culs De Sac wrote:Hence, KORT is the villain because they exercised any and all rights to the said games. For those of you in THOTA who feel that this is a dishonorable way to win. A cowards way out, etc, etc.. Then why don't you have a vote amongst yourselves...and if the winner of the actual games at hand is TOFU at the end of the day.. Then feel free to face them in a WAR.. so that you can give the "proper winners" a shot to claim victory of the CC cup title.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users