Conquer Club

Yoker8686 and pqjune [noted]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Yoker8686 and pqjune [noted]

Postby Machiavelli39 on Sun Sep 26, 2010 3:21 pm

Accused:

Yoker8686
pqjune


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis (Perhaps)
Conducting Secret Diplomacy


Game number(s):

Game 7540495


Comments: I am accusing Yoker8686 and pqjune of conducting secret diplomacy and, very possibly (as there exists little doubt to think otherwise) being multis.

My Reasoning for conducting secret diplomacy: it has become quite evident that these two players have set up some sort of out-of-game agreement (as nothing has been stated in the game chat) to spare each other any unrecoverable damage until they've eliminated all players but themselves; thus leaving the games points up for either of them to grab.

Both have, in the end, become superpowers. This fact is acceptable on its own, however they did not achieve their unstoppable positions through brilliant strategy or in-game diplomacy. Instead (if you look at the game's current set up now), they've left the majority of their connecting borders undefended for Many turns, Implying there is some form of agreement not to attack one another while wiping out the remaining players - this fact is, as well, fine all by itself, however they left each other's borders alone once it would be very unwise to do so: once Yoker8686 had conquered all of Asia/Oceania and pqjune conquered all of Africa/South America.

Of course, if you are still not convinced of foul play, allow me to further my evidence regarding their possible outside-of-game affiliation: both players have played a total of 93 games against one another, most of which were 1 vs. 1, however the point still remains strong.

One may still feel inclined to argue that if you were to look at the game log, both have attacked one another fairly well more than once. However, please let me remind you that it required tremendous coercion by means of game chat and troop positioning to force these two players to attack one another: they essentially "threw us a bone" by attacking each other no more than 4 noticeable times, but were able to easily recover.

So, you can see my frustration when, for the past few turns, I've had to watch Blue hold Asia/Oceania without hardly any border defence against Yellow, Yellow not defending SA/Africa against Blue, which therefore leaves them consistently attacking me and Red (who has been eliminated due to Blue's expansion into Oceania, and Yellow allowing this without any indication of threat towards Blue).

I'll cut myself off here, however just for clarification, I'd like to have these two checked out for being multis, for as I said before, I see more evidence For them being multis than I do against.

Thank you, and I appreciate your time.

Machiavelli39
User avatar
Colonel Machiavelli39
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:19 am
Location: Kingston, ON

Re: Yoker8686 and pqjune

Postby rdsrds2120 on Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:14 am

Somethings fishy, I doubt that two inexperienced players themselves could get that far in a game by themselves against other players so many times. Just a thought.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Yoker8686 and pqjune

Postby Machiavelli39 on Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:35 pm

rdsrds2120 wrote:Somethings fishy, I doubt that two inexperienced players themselves could get that far in a game by themselves against other players so many times. Just a thought.


Yeah, you're telling me. It can Only be that, as a seasoned major like myself should Never lose to such low rankers ;)

...Bahaha...

But yeah, it does seem a bit more than suspect... it seems evident, really.
User avatar
Colonel Machiavelli39
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:19 am
Location: Kingston, ON

Re: Yoker8686 and pqjune

Postby Machiavelli39 on Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:42 pm

As well, my point over the fact that I'm left only to coerce these two into attacking each other has been furthered with Blue's past turn: after I presented my case to them in the game chat, Blue decided to attack Yellow and call a border truce with me instead of eliminating me, which would have been the obvious move to do (I was down to 40 troops total, and Blue/Yellow were receiving more than 40 troops each that turn, so it wouldn't have been much of a problem for either of them to take me out); however, again, as I predicted, Blue hesitated and "threw me a bone" for lack of a better term. Everything is all so absolutely suspect...
User avatar
Colonel Machiavelli39
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:19 am
Location: Kingston, ON

Re: Yoker8686 and pqjune

Postby Machiavelli39 on Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:44 pm

Furthermore, I'm claiming that these two are acting as though they ought to cover up their tracks through, really, very odd cooperation with me. I feel as though only a guilty mind would conduct themslves this way.
User avatar
Colonel Machiavelli39
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:19 am
Location: Kingston, ON

Re: Yoker8686 and pqjune

Postby Machiavelli39 on Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:50 pm

So is no one going to address my issue?
User avatar
Colonel Machiavelli39
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:19 am
Location: Kingston, ON

Re: Yoker8686 and pqjune

Postby king achilles on Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:04 am

Although we can assume that yoker8686 and pqjune could be friends, there is not enough evidence to conclude there is a secret diplomacy between them. This shall be noted for future reference.
Image
Please don't have more than 1 account. If you have any CC concerns, you can contact us here.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
 
Posts: 13255
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm

Re: Yoker8686 and pqjune [noted]

Postby Machiavelli39 on Wed Sep 29, 2010 12:29 am

Fair enough then. Thank you.
User avatar
Colonel Machiavelli39
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:19 am
Location: Kingston, ON


Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users