1. The territory "No Name" is bad*ss. I hope you don't change the name
2. Central Coast should definitely stay +3, as it's equally as easy/hard to hold as Mojave.
That raises the question, should Sierra nevada be +3 as well? it too is 5 terri 3 borders.
3. The labels on the mini map are unnecessarily hard to read. Do you think you could increase the font size?
I think I'm going to ditch the written legend in favor of a larger mini map that contains both the region names and bonus amounts.
4. You think you could also have a different icon for cities? The black circles you have are rather bland and awkwardly stick out.
I agree the black dots were just a place holder to show people where they would be. I'll find something better to do with them later in graphics.
i like this a lot.
Monterey for the win!
YOu may not want to, and I dont think you need it. But seems ppl think its too narrow or such- so you could do something like 13 colonies , some surfers out in the water, some islands ... i dunno.
Always good to hear from you AoN.
Yeah I've considered something like that, my version on that would be that adjacent port cities could attack each other. I would ad territories to Bay area and LA that would receive those attacks as well.
For example Eureka could attack San Francisco, San Francisco could attack Eureka and Montery, Monterey could attack San Francisco and Lompoc, Lompoc could attack Monterey and Beverely hills, Beverely hills could attack Montery and San diego, and San Diego could attack Beverely hills.
But like you said it may not be needed. I'm playing a game on this map wih friends right now and so far it hasn't seemed to be to big of an issue.
