Conquer Club

Lord Voldemort abuse power [cleared]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby cena-rules on Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:42 pm

notyou2 wrote:HE DID NOT KNOW OF THE REAL TRIVIA CONTEST AND WAS HAVING A TRIVIA CONTEST WITH A FEW OTHERS N THE ROOM. THEY WERE ACTUALLY USING THE ROOM FOR A PART OF ITS ACTUAL PURPOSE.

WHY IS THIS HARD TO UNDERSTAND????

HEARING AIDS FOR ALL!!!!!!!


Some mods will not allow this as it is not THE contest, others will. As said in the guidelines and I quote

live chat guidelines wrote:Because of the dynamic and always-going nature of chat, all rules and guidelines are interpreted according to the situation solely at the Moderator's discretion. Moderator directions and/or decisions made are to be followed without question.


So to borrow a famous line

Suck it up cupcake
19:41:22 ā€¹jakewilliamsā€ŗ I was a pedo
User avatar
Lieutenant cena-rules
 
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Chat

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby jefjef on Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:48 pm

Wow. I just re read this all again and I can not for the life of me see where LV was in the wrong or why this is even an issue.

Well whoever actually rules on this no discipline is due juan for this even being in C&A. It was moved here.

The new NAPOLEON EUROPE map ROCKS!!!!!
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby eddie2 on Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:24 pm

omg i think i am going 2 have 2 agree with jefjef and lv on this one now(i do not use live chat so am not 100 percent on its rules)

only thing i can say is that a simple response 2 juan would of been a sorry rules for this section of live chat have not been posted yet. but i am the chat mod for just now and am asking for you 2 move 2 social. which lv done maybe not in the correct manner but it was done.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby support81ghent on Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:15 pm

4words
no harm was done

now with subtitles, juan got kicked out of trivia, he made a drama about it, ignored several warnings then got kicked a few times
and even banned i think.
clue of story, suck it up juan you went wrong in this issue weither you did or didnt deserve the triviakick when the quiz was over for a few hours
User avatar
Corporal support81ghent
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:53 am
Location: Gent

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby notyou2 on Wed Aug 18, 2010 7:19 pm

eddie2 wrote:omg i think i am going 2 have 2 agree with jefjef and lv on this one now(i do not use live chat so am not 100 percent on its rules)

only thing i can say is that a simple response 2 juan would of been a sorry rules for this section of live chat have not been posted yet. but i am the chat mod for just now and am asking for you 2 move 2 social. which lv done maybe not in the correct manner but it was done.


I agree Eddie.

But:
1.Juan has been a chat goer for a long time. It's kinda like his turf along with other regular chatters.

2. Chat as far as I know has never been used for gaming purposes before, but it is now, and Juan happened not to see the announcements on this.
(I personally feel making games in chat is a mistake. It's been what 2 days, and there has already been an incident)

3. Juan's friend here was recently banned for doing something that MANY others, and privileged MANY OTHERS, do regularly and Juan is upset with authority on this site. It does not appear to be a level playing field in Juan's eyes, so he becomes confrontational, especially when the rule being quoted to him does not address the issue of the argument.

It's another case of "Do as I say, not as I do".
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby eddie2 on Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:32 pm

trust me i know all of this but what juan should understand is that you can push for a response from lv he will never back down. but you got to know when 2 stop like what i do i have little comments i chuck in every now and then. thats not enough 2 ban me but gets my opinion across

in this case lv wasnt wrong with what he done just the fact he can never awnser a ? correctly. what juan should of done was brought it 2 the forums in general disscusion instead of carrying it on in live chat. at the end of it live chat is for live chat about day 2 day stuff and the forums is for things like this.where he would not of got a ban for it.


still in shock im defending lv.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby clapper011 on Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:45 pm

Pander88uk wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:Why couldn't you just chat in a different room? Sounds like your stubbornness caused the real problem here.


No, the problem here is inconsistency and abusive power. Others were allowed to chat in that room. Permission was granted today, for someone to chat in the room aside from the Trivia Contest. The permission was not granted by lovo, but another moderator, which reflects the inconsistency. With some being given permission and others being kicked for questioning another mod's inconsistent ruling, that does make it abuse.

Inconsistency is 90% of CC's difficulties. There will always be grey areas, but the grey areas do not have to be 10 miles wide. When there are grey areas, kick/bans without first, FORMAL official warnings, are abusive.


It makes no difference what another mod decides to do. LV was looking after chat that day and he decided he didn't want conversation in that room. End of. LV donates his spare time to look after chat, and if he makes a very reasonable request to move the conversation elsewhere, then it should be done. There was no need for Juan to be stubborn when it was so easy to just move rooms.

THE MOD that allowed others to post in the trivia tab was myself. IT WAS NOT social chit chat, I allowed members to do an unofficial trivia contest, more of a practice for them... but it was to be only trivia questions and answers and discussions NOT general discussion! And I WAS ASKED before they held the unofficial trivia so they knew they were allowed. Trivia tab is for trivia and is only a temporary tab. Lovo gave warnings... not everyone was there at the time he was given them. Juan got heated with lovo and emotions got in the way. unfortunately it did not end well.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class clapper011
 
Posts: 7208
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:25 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby notyou2 on Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:58 pm

Clappy, it takes 2 to tango. Is there any chance that this can be attributed to a hot summer night, sweep it under the rug, and remove Juan's ban?
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby Metsfanmax on Wed Aug 18, 2010 9:22 pm

notyou2 wrote:Clappy, it takes 2 to tango. Is there any chance that this can be attributed to a hot summer night, sweep it under the rug, and remove Juan's ban?


Yeah, there's no pragmatic benefit in keeping up the ban. Juan may not agree with the decision, but it sounds like he's willing to stop pressing the issue.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby Woodruff on Wed Aug 18, 2010 9:48 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Clappy, it takes 2 to tango. Is there any chance that this can be attributed to a hot summer night, sweep it under the rug, and remove Juan's ban?


Yeah, there's no pragmatic benefit in keeping up the ban. Juan may not agree with the decision, but it sounds like he's willing to stop pressing the issue.


You believe that based on his two posts in THIS thread?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby chemefreak on Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:10 pm

Ugh! I can't believe I am going to say this, but LV was just doing his job and there is no reason for this thread. Why persist after he asked you to leave the forum? There are plenty of other places to chat...why was that thread so important? Plus, if you keep pestering a mod they are going to ding you. I say "well done LV" in this case.
:twisted: ChemE :twisted:
Image
Š±Ń€Š°Ń‚ŃŒŃ Š² руŠŗŠ¾ŃŃ‚ŠŗŠ°Ń…
I ā™„ ++The Legion++
User avatar
Lieutenant chemefreak
 
Posts: 3451
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Columbus (Franklin Park), Ohio

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby clapper011 on Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:43 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Clappy, it takes 2 to tango. Is there any chance that this can be attributed to a hot summer night, sweep it under the rug, and remove Juan's ban?


Yeah, there's no pragmatic benefit in keeping up the ban. Juan may not agree with the decision, but it sounds like he's willing to stop pressing the issue.

seriously? guys?... do I wear a red name?...... :?
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class clapper011
 
Posts: 7208
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:25 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby stahrgazer on Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:24 pm

lord voldemort wrote:lol stah you arrived in the last 5 mins of the hour long saga...you honestly have no idea.


I was there a little longer than 5 minutes, enough to see you baiting and cursing a guy who was obviously disgruntled but who wasn't being nasty about it.

I saw the links you posted, which only said not to disrupt trivia.

And, to be very clear, when I first heard the ruckus I was on your side. it was YOUR nastiness that made me think Juan was probably accurate. And you know what? Your story jives with his, except you left out how nastily you mishandled a disgruntled person. I realize you won't 'back down' even when your decorum is not befitting your office... but if you hadn't kept baiting, he probably would've stfu.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby notyou2 on Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:14 am

Did anyone take a screen shot of the conversation? I bet there is one out there.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby eddie2 on Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:02 am

notyou2 wrote:Did anyone take a screen shot of the conversation? I bet there is one out there.


more important does lv have a screen shot of the conversation if not juan should appeal as there is no proof that he even done all of this. like you said 2 me previously lv where is the proof of this even though he has admited what was said and done.

here is lv's quote

lord voldemort wrote:exactly...where is your proof eddie :roll: just because i say something does not make it true...i want screen shots as proof...


ps lv i still agree with you but if you don't have screen shots the ban should be lifted
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby Royal Panda on Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:36 am

eddie2 wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Did anyone take a screen shot of the conversation? I bet there is one out there.


more important does lv have a screen shot of the conversation if not juan should appeal as there is no proof that he even done all of this. like you said 2 me previously lv where is the proof of this even though he has admited what was said and done.

here is lv's quote

lord voldemort wrote:exactly...where is your proof eddie :roll: just because i say something does not make it true...i want screen shots as proof...


ps lv i still agree with you but if you don't have screen shots the ban should be lifted


Wasn't this only a 24 hour ban anyway?
User avatar
Brigadier Royal Panda
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:44 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby eddie2 on Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:38 am

panda this was a totally different thing im not going 2 go into it in this thread lets just say has lv got screen shots to back up what he done (hope so)
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby stahrgazer on Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:39 am

Pander88uk wrote:
eddie2 wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Did anyone take a screen shot of the conversation? I bet there is one out there.


more important does lv have a screen shot of the conversation if not juan should appeal as there is no proof that he even done all of this. like you said 2 me previously lv where is the proof of this even though he has admited what was said and done.

here is lv's quote

lord voldemort wrote:exactly...where is your proof eddie :roll: just because i say something does not make it true...i want screen shots as proof...


ps lv i still agree with you but if you don't have screen shots the ban should be lifted


Wasn't this only a 24 hour ban anyway?


Aren't punishments on CC incremental? In other words, having gotten a 24-hour ban for this fiasco now, could any future instance of a questionable concern be punished more strictly?

It is questionable that someone would be punished for asking "why" when the answer lv repeatedly gave (link to a post that says "do not disrupt the Trivia Contest or you will be disciplined", did NOT answer why Juan was disciplined (kicked) when he was NOT disrupting a Trivia Contest.)
Image
User avatar
Sergeant stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby SirSebstar on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:37 am

the trivia chat pane is only for trivia. not for social chatter, so when asked not to do so, he failed to comply. thats breaking 2 rules, not just 1
User avatar
Major SirSebstar
 
Posts: 6969
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:51 am
Location: SirSebstar is BACK. Highscore: Colonel Score: 2919 21/03/2011

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby Metsfanmax on Thu Aug 19, 2010 11:53 am

Woodruff wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Clappy, it takes 2 to tango. Is there any chance that this can be attributed to a hot summer night, sweep it under the rug, and remove Juan's ban?


Yeah, there's no pragmatic benefit in keeping up the ban. Juan may not agree with the decision, but it sounds like he's willing to stop pressing the issue.


You believe that based on his two posts in THIS thread?


Well, it sounded to me like some of these people defending him are his friends and have talked to him about this. If this is incorrect, then I take back my statement.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby Juan_Bottom on Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm

jakewilliams wrote:
live chat guidelines wrote:Because of the dynamic and always-going nature of chat, all rules and guidelines are interpreted according to the situation solely at the Moderator's discretion. Moderator directions and/or decisions made are to be followed without question. If a user has a problem with the direction or decision that the moderator made, the user is not to disrupt the room in complaint but to address the moderator directly through private messaging. If you feel the situation was not resolved sufficiently, you may forward the problem to the Head Chatter or any of the Admin. Be sure to include logs of the attempted resolution.


That's what matters. If you don't think a mod is handling something correctly, you should save the copies of the logs and contact someone the Head Chatter or an Admin. I know (and like) both Juan and LV, and I believe that the odds are good that those two going up against each other will never turn out well.


Let me be completely honest with you JW; if you are a competent MOD and enforce all of the rules as they are written (which I think is true of you), then you will never need this blanket rule to cover your ass. This rule just covers up the mistakes of MODs who really aren't deserving of the badge. Besides this, nothing in life ever changes unless someone asks that ancient philosophical question "why?"

Now, LOVO posted this rule after he realized that there was no rule against using the Trivia Contest tab. He was trying to back away from his mistake without admitting that he was wrong about there even being a rule in the first place. It would have been doubly painful for him, no doubt, because right before he went to go check the rules at my request: he said "I know the rules, I enforce them everyday."

notyou2 wrote:Perhaps if some mods with a bit of wisdom, compassion, and a sense of fairness were chosen, as well as the ability to LISTEN.

Power corrupts.

You don't get that when you have a 16 year olds joining the internet police. Im not saying that LOVO is 16, but it's a point to be made about what to expect from MODs.
Besides this, wasn't LOVO in the BPBs?

lord voldemort wrote:he also received many formal warnings before the kick/ban

Your warnings were for "trolling." Which, I explained to you, it's not trolling to be passionate about something. You were simply using it as an excuse to get rid of me, because I was telling everyone about your abuse of powers. You were embarrassed and wanted me gone.
And you weren't warning me either. You said, twice if I'm not mistaken, that I needed to end the conversation or you could interpret what I was saying as trolling and ban me. That is not a warning, that is a threat.

Pander88uk wrote:Juan was told quite clearly the purpose and states so himself:

Juan_Bottom wrote:LOVO comes in, and says that we are not allowed to use the Trivia tab to have discussions. I asked him why. He says that it's in the Live Chat rules, and he posts the following link:
viewtopic.php?t=124342

...


So I, being the smartass that I am, kindly point out that there is no rule there about using Trivia Chat when the competitions aren't happening. So he kicks me from Trivia.


What is wrong with this? Lovo explained his case, and only removed Juan from TRIVIA, which he shouldn't need to be using anyway, not the whole of chat. That only happened when Juan wouldn't let it rest.

See, I wasn't told clearly. That's kinda the point. I asked why we couldn't use it, and LOVO said that it was in the rules and linked the bash page with the Trivia Questions tab's actual listed rules.
When I saw the thread my initial response was "Oh Sh*t! I thought it was a private tab!" I was well prepared to admit that I made a mistake. I'm not that stubborn that I can't admit when I am wrong.
But, I read the five or so bullets and there was no rule. Which is what I told LOVO, and then he kicked me from the Trivia Tab. He didn't explain jack to anyone.

Pander88uk wrote:Merely asking why? Sounds a bit more than that, and as I mentioned previously, he was told the reason, so no need to keep asking. Also as I said previously, Lovo donates a LOT of time to help this site run which he doesn't have to do. You should all be grateful to him for doing this free of charge!

That doesn't mean we should all bow down to him and let him do whatever he wants. Nor does that make him good at what he does. *Real Cops put their lives on the line every day, but I'm not throwing a wreath around the neck of a corrupt one.

Not to draw comparisons to a real life Police Officer.

cena-rules wrote:[*]Social stays in Social, Callouts stay in Callouts and Trivia Contests is only for Trivia Contests.

THIS IS A NEW RULE THAT JUST APPEARED AFTER I MADE THIS THREAD. APEARANTLY NO ONE THOUGHT OF THIS BEFORE I STARTED BITCHING ABOUT LOVO CLEARLY ABUSING HIS POWER. THIS IS AN INDIRECT ADMISSION BY THE MODS THAT THEY WERE WRONG. IF THEY WERE RIGHT THEN WHY DID THEY RETRO-ACTIVELY (AND SILENTLY) MAKE A NEW RULE?
God-damnitt Cena I told you in my first post that there were no rules about using Trivia Contest's tab.

Seriously this does make me pretty happy about it though. At least they kinda admit that LOVO was completely wrong.


I didn't make this a thread to complain about abuse. The MOD's ALWAYS protect their own in public. I actually made this thread in General Discussion.
The PM that I got from SirSebstar literally ignored everything that I said, and he/she copy/pasted general chat rules to it. It didn't mention anything that I said in this thread at all. Which is stupid BTW, and shows how one-sided MODs are when talking about one of their own. Add a new rule to help cover your asses and then send me a general PM about chat abuse. WTF SirSebstar?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby Metsfanmax on Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:49 pm

I don't understand what the problem is. Why are you upset that you were banned from a room that, if you knew what it was for, you wouldn't have chatted in? It seems like the only thing you're upset about is that LV enforced a rule that wasn't explicitly written down, but should have been. So why are you doing this when you explicitly state:

Juan_Bottom wrote:I didn't make this a thread to complain about abuse.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby mpjh on Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:53 pm

you apparently don't know juan.
Cadet mpjh
 
Posts: 6714
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:32 am
Location: gone

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby Juan_Bottom on Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:59 pm

Metsfanmax wrote:I don't understand what the problem is. Why are you upset that you were banned from a room that, if you knew what it was for, you wouldn't have chatted in? It seems like the only thing you're upset about is that LV enforced a rule that wasn't explicitly written down, but should have been. So why are you doing this when you explicitly state:

Juan_Bottom wrote:I didn't make this a thread to complain about abuse.



Don't say "wasn't explicitly" because that isn't the case. He enforced a rule that didn't exist. And this non-existent rule apparently gave him authority to ban me. He would rather ban someone, than admit to being wrong or actually discussing the issue. And that is your police officer.

If I was completely wrong then they wouldn't have added the rule while I was banned.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Lord Voldemort abuse power / Juan_Bottom crosses the lin

Postby Metsfanmax on Thu Aug 19, 2010 2:08 pm

Juan_Bottom wrote:
Metsfanmax wrote:I don't understand what the problem is. Why are you upset that you were banned from a room that, if you knew what it was for, you wouldn't have chatted in? It seems like the only thing you're upset about is that LV enforced a rule that wasn't explicitly written down, but should have been. So why are you doing this when you explicitly state:

Juan_Bottom wrote:I didn't make this a thread to complain about abuse.



Don't say "wasn't explicitly" because that isn't the case. He enforced a rule that didn't exist. And this non-existent rule apparently gave him authority to ban me. He would rather ban someone, than admit to being wrong or actually discussing the issue. And that is your police officer.

If I was completely wrong then they wouldn't have added the rule while I was banned.


Well, that's not true at all. He enforced the rule that says that moderators have complete discretion over the rules. You may not like that rule, and you may think he was using inconsistently, but he was within his powers as a mod.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Metsfanmax
 
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users