Moderator: Cartographers
cairnswk wrote:Mmmm. There is still room for vast improvement.
2. But what is happening with the bottom of Greece, the bit under Thessalonica, shouldn't that be orange also.
Raskholnikov wrote:2. But what is happening with the bottom of Greece, the bit under Thessalonica, shouldn't that be orange also.
Greece (ie peninsular Greece, former Morea) became independent in 1829. Northern Greece and Macedonia remained under the Ottomans until 1914. Therefore, Natty's map is correct and there is no problem with Greece not being orange for reasons just stated.
natty_dread wrote:cairnswk wrote:Mmmm. There is still room for vast improvement.
No doubt. Can you elaborate?
The Bison King wrote:BUUUUUT, if you really need something to do I think I noticed some strange vertical lines in the Adriatic sea. I'm not sure if they are supposed to be there or not but they look a little funny to me.
natty_dread wrote:natty_dread wrote:cairnswk wrote:Mmmm. There is still room for vast improvement.
No doubt. Can you elaborate?
Cairns (or anyone), can you elaborate on that? How is this vast improvement to be achieved?
cairnswk wrote:I accept Rash's take on Greece.
The top right legend still doesn't sit correctly.
You've got plenty of room to move that whole legend around and centre the title and sub-wording better; also the whole legend could use the full outline of the border (same as the bottom legend)
cairnswk wrote:I still don't like the monolpoly train...i'd remove it altogether. It looks like this is meant to be a monopoly board and not the Orient Express.
cairnswk wrote:I think you can take the graphics to a whole new level by using elements of that page 1 poster that will give the map the feeling of the orient express.
cairnswk wrote:The borders around the legend don't entirely express the period eloquently.
natty_dread wrote:cairnswk wrote:I accept Rash's take on Greece.
The top right legend still doesn't sit correctly.
You've got plenty of room to move that whole legend around and centre the title and sub-wording better; also the whole legend could use the full outline of the border (same as the bottom legend)
I'll look into it, but...cairnswk wrote:I still don't like the monolpoly train...i'd remove it altogether. It looks like this is meant to be a monopoly board and not the Orient Express.
...Are we even looking at the same map? The monopoly train is gone already!
cairnswk wrote:I think you can take the graphics to a whole new level by using elements of that page 1 poster that will give the map the feeling of the orient express.
Well, I do have one idea for that... stay tuned...
cairnswk wrote:The borders around the legend don't entirely express the period eloquently.
What kind of borders should there be?
cairnswk wrote:Nup, it's still there on V18.png previous page
Perhaps something in this vain..
http://www.fivestarhotelsandspas.com/im ... press1.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ef_M4U2nwus/S ... XPRESS.jpg
Perhaps Use something from the building architecture style:
http://www.fotografgalerisi.net/GaleriS ... ciGari.jpg
Be creative but not over the top.
natty_dread wrote:cairnswk wrote:Nup, it's still there on V18.png previous page
That's a different train. I thought your complaint was with the train that looked like a monopoly train. This one is similar to the locomotive used on the orient express at the time (I couldn't find a good picture of the exact model but this is very similar.)
Or are you saying you don't want any train in the legend?
ender516 wrote:Yes, "rail monopoly" is better.
What do you think of having a very thin border go all the way round the map? I think that might connect the legend with the map a bit better.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users