Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
ViperOverLord wrote:If someone flames and then report and/or threatens to report and then lies and accuses of slander while flaming some more (after days of flaming with one liners) then they are abusing the system and the members. I'm a big boy. I don't require any sympathy. I'm posting the complaint for my own protection and so that this pattern of his scurilous works can be known going forward.
MeDeFe wrote:As has already been pointed out, you can simply report the PMs that were sent to you by clicking the button with an "!" which is located at the top of them. To the right.
This will make it a lot easier to judge whether harrassment by pm has taken place or not.
lord voldemort wrote:indeed...just report the pms so i can read them
Darwins_Bane wrote:unless you're going to report the pms then this is basically a spurious and useless complaint of 3 year old tit for tat. Your word versus theirs.
lord voldemort wrote:lol darwins isnt king doctor.
i have pmd vol about how to report a pm..he understands now...
drunkmonkey wrote:You're not forwarding, you're reporting. Click the "!" symbol next to the "quote" button. It can't be altered that way. (I don't think mods can just "check your box", but I could be wrong.)
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
jefjef wrote:Page 9 of my wall. King Doctor is attempting to sell drugs. This is a family oriented casually manipulated gaming site. Please protect us all!~
That is only because you have not seen how your wall could be. Also, would you like to buy any Mescaline?
by King Doctor
on Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:27 pm
ViperOverLord wrote:Darwins_Bane wrote:unless you're going to report the pms then this is basically a spurious and useless complaint of 3 year old tit for tat. Your word versus theirs.
I find it interesting that you are using the word spurious. King Doctor used the same exact term in his defense in the 42nd post of the thread: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=123007&start=42
That makes me just think you are one of his other accounts.
Woodruff wrote:ViperOverLord wrote:Darwins_Bane wrote:unless you're going to report the pms then this is basically a spurious and useless complaint of 3 year old tit for tat. Your word versus theirs.
I find it interesting that you are using the word spurious. King Doctor used the same exact term in his defense in the 42nd post of the thread: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=123007&start=42
That makes me just think you are one of his other accounts.
No...that's a very common term in this particular forum.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:ok, one thing at a time now.
PM abuse by King Doctor
I think King Doctor can be cleared of PM abuse. Whether he was teasing or not, he was trying to draw your attention to said hangman thread. There is no abusive content in his PMs. It is also worth noting that he refrained from responding with an insult after you insulted him first. Moreover, he agreed to stop sending you PMs about it when you asked him to, and apparently hasn't sent you any more since then.
No, a case for PM abuse can not be established.
Baiting/Harrassing/Flaming by KD and pimpdave
pimpdave created a thread with a hangman game about something you said. As far as harrassment goes the most that can possibly be pinned on him is mild incitement to pm harrassment when he said to pm you to say whether a specific letter was in the word or not. People quite often have threads created about them and far worse than this has been created in the past. No, a thread as mild as this one was can't well be called baiting, especially since it was clear the solution would have to be something harmless, preceding tasteless insinuations or not. As such it would probably have been the less elegant action to lock the thread while still in a state of ambiguity. Furthermore, it was also clear to every reader of average intelligence almost from the beginning that whatever the word would be, it would pimpdave's brainchild.
It could also easily have been countered by you. The original image only featured the gallows and no amount of dashes for the number of letters, all you would have had to do was make up any word, tell the number of characters in it and play along. That way you would have turned the tables and let things work to your advantage. As mods we are here to help mediate and resolve conflicts, but we do this in our spare time for no payment, and surely it is not to expect too much of every user that they also do their best not to escalate what is, to begin with, indistinguishable from a harmless joke.
Regarding the PMs they both suggested they had received... Well, whenever someone claims to quote a pm by another user every sane person's first reaction is "that's made up". Only if there's evidence to the contrary do people begin to assume that the quotes may be genuine. Merely putting words in someone's mouth is not sufficient for a ban, the content would have to be a personal attack on the other person which is not the case here. The closest thing to a personal attack is KD's claim that you were in a rage, and this was only after you had insulted him in your reply to one of his PMs. That is hardly enough to qualify as harrassment or flaming.
King Doctor and pimpdave possibly being multis
No.
I think every MH will back me up on this.
To sum up, while it is possible to see things so there is a number of minor jibes, they appear, upon closer inspection, to be of a nature not sufficient for warranting formal disciplinary action.
So far my take on the situation, this thread is still open for additional input until the C&A department, being the main caretaker of this forum, makes a final verdict.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users